Verified
Status Update
Comments
br...@snapchat.com <br...@snapchat.com> #2
[Comment deleted]
br...@snapchat.com <br...@snapchat.com> #4
Also of note is the adb error when trying to install bad APK: INSTALL_FAILED_DEXOPT
mk...@google.com <mk...@google.com> #5
load dex files over 5Gb. -> load dex files over 5Mb.
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #6
Same here! Looking forward to a solution :)
Android Studio version: 0.8.12
buildToolsVersion 21.0.1
Gradle 1.11
Android Studio version: 0.8.12
buildToolsVersion 21.0.1
Gradle 1.11
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #7
There is already an option in dx allowing to force generation of smaller dex files:
--set-max-idx-number=<value>
Unfortunately changing the default is not a solution since the linearAlloc limit can be reached at very different levels depending on the classes hierarchy and other criteria.
In addition for most applications, moving to multidex will only help to workaround the linearalloc limit for the installation. But the application will still crash against the same limit at execution. The only working use case where I know multidex can help with linearalloc is when the apk does not contains one application but distinct pieces running in separate process.
--set-max-idx-number=<value>
Unfortunately changing the default is not a solution since the linearAlloc limit can be reached at very different levels depending on the classes hierarchy and other criteria.
In addition for most applications, moving to multidex will only help to workaround the linearalloc limit for the installation. But the application will still crash against the same limit at execution. The only working use case where I know multidex can help with linearalloc is when the apk does not contains one application but distinct pieces running in separate process.
br...@snapchat.com <br...@snapchat.com> #8
Thanks for your quick response.
It's nice to know about that command line option. I do not see it in the output of 'dx --help', might be good to add that.
I'm not very familiar with the 'linearAlloc limit' issue outside of the context of the dexopt step. My sample app is able to run once the lower idx value is set, although I do not actually call into any of the library code that is bundled with the app. I assume it's undefined when/if the 'linearAlloc limit' will be hit in a large application on gb.
I'm a bit confused as to the platform compatibility of multidex given the 'linearAlloc limit' bug. What specific versions of Android are supported? The multidex code implies back to v4 (https://android.googlesource.com/platform/frameworks/multidex/+/master/library/src/android/support/multidex/MultiDex.java ) but it would seem that ICS is the earliest supported platform. Is this correct?
It's nice to know about that command line option. I do not see it in the output of 'dx --help', might be good to add that.
I'm not very familiar with the 'linearAlloc limit' issue outside of the context of the dexopt step. My sample app is able to run once the lower idx value is set, although I do not actually call into any of the library code that is bundled with the app. I assume it's undefined when/if the 'linearAlloc limit' will be hit in a large application on gb.
I'm a bit confused as to the platform compatibility of multidex given the 'linearAlloc limit' bug. What specific versions of Android are supported? The multidex code implies back to v4 (
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #9
The option is not documented in --help because it was designed for testing and we're not capable of documenting a reliable way to use it as a workaround of the linearalloc limit.
The linearalloc limit is reached when loading classes. At install time dexopt is loading all classes contained in the dex so it's facing the limit immediately. At execution the limit may be reached after some delay dependending of the usage you have of the packaged classes. If you face it at install time but not at execution, this means you never trigger the loading of some classes. In a real application those never loaded classes should have been shrinked away manually or by Proguard. The exception is when there are different groups of classes in the dex files used in separate process.
About multidex library supported versions I've merged recently a change to try to be clearerhttps://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/108023/
The summary is that the library should work down to API 4 (Donut), but below ICS applications will probably be hit by the linearalloc limit
The linearalloc limit is reached when loading classes. At install time dexopt is loading all classes contained in the dex so it's facing the limit immediately. At execution the limit may be reached after some delay dependending of the usage you have of the packaged classes. If you face it at install time but not at execution, this means you never trigger the loading of some classes. In a real application those never loaded classes should have been shrinked away manually or by Proguard. The exception is when there are different groups of classes in the dex files used in separate process.
About multidex library supported versions I've merged recently a change to try to be clearer
The summary is that the library should work down to API 4 (Donut), but below ICS applications will probably be hit by the linearalloc limit
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #10
for Android studio use:
dexOptions {
additionalParameters = ['--multi-dex', '--set-max-idx-number=40000']
}
dexOptions {
additionalParameters = ['--multi-dex', '--set-max-idx-number=40000']
}
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #11
I still have this issue and it's driving me nuts
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #14
Project: r8
Branch: 4.0
commit b367460c6cab514f9c8c974f2a48e7ed862610de
Author: Morten Krogh-Jespersen <mkroghj@google.com>
Date: Wed Mar 22 16:30:37 2023
[ApiModel] Insert CheckCast for return values causing verification error
Bug: b/272725341
Change-Id: I2479d669217d90f057fa248fcea0f0f27faf91a6
M src/main/java/com/android/tools/r8/androidapi/ComputedApiLevel.java
M src/main/java/com/android/tools/r8/ir/code/Return.java
M src/main/java/com/android/tools/r8/ir/conversion/IRConverter.java
M src/main/java/com/android/tools/r8/ir/desugar/apimodel/ApiInvokeOutlinerDesugaring.java
A src/main/java/com/android/tools/r8/ir/optimize/RemoveVerificationErrorForUnknownReturnedValues.java
M src/main/java/com/android/tools/r8/utils/AndroidApiLevelUtils.java
M src/main/java/com/android/tools/r8/utils/InternalOptions.java
M src/test/java/com/android/tools/r8/apimodel/ApiModelManualOutlineWithUnknownReturnTypeTest.java
M src/test/java/com/android/tools/r8/apimodel/ApiModelOutlineWithUnknownReturnTypeTest.java
https://r8-review.googlesource.com/77492
Branch: 4.0
commit b367460c6cab514f9c8c974f2a48e7ed862610de
Author: Morten Krogh-Jespersen <mkroghj@google.com>
Date: Wed Mar 22 16:30:37 2023
[ApiModel] Insert CheckCast for return values causing verification error
Bug:
Change-Id: I2479d669217d90f057fa248fcea0f0f27faf91a6
M src/main/java/com/android/tools/r8/androidapi/ComputedApiLevel.java
M src/main/java/com/android/tools/r8/ir/code/Return.java
M src/main/java/com/android/tools/r8/ir/conversion/IRConverter.java
M src/main/java/com/android/tools/r8/ir/desugar/apimodel/ApiInvokeOutlinerDesugaring.java
A src/main/java/com/android/tools/r8/ir/optimize/RemoveVerificationErrorForUnknownReturnedValues.java
M src/main/java/com/android/tools/r8/utils/AndroidApiLevelUtils.java
M src/main/java/com/android/tools/r8/utils/InternalOptions.java
M src/test/java/com/android/tools/r8/apimodel/ApiModelManualOutlineWithUnknownReturnTypeTest.java
M src/test/java/com/android/tools/r8/apimodel/ApiModelOutlineWithUnknownReturnTypeTest.java
mk...@google.com <mk...@google.com> #15
I've backported the fix to version 4.0.58. Could you take that version for a spin to see if that solves the issues?
br...@snapchat.com <br...@snapchat.com> #16
I verified the fix works. Thanks!
mk...@google.com <mk...@google.com> #17
Thanks for reporting back and your help with this issue.
r....@gmail.com <r....@gmail.com> #18
Comment has been deleted.
lm...@gmail.com <lm...@gmail.com> #19
ชอบ
tw...@gmail.com <tw...@gmail.com> #20
ชอบเรียนรู้
Description
Background
We upgraded from AGP 7.2.2 to AGP 7.4.2 and are now seeing hard class verification failures (crash on startup) on Android 11. It appears the root cause is due to the ApiModelOutliner now being enabled and having a weird interaction with our existing ApiHelper classes (as described here ).
I'll share artifacts (dex2oat logs, compiler dump) over email.
Details
Original Code:
Proguard Rules:
Smali Before (AGP 7.2):
Smali After (AGP 7.4):
Workaround
We can fix the crash by removing our proguard rules; however, we see that it will cause class verification failures to be re-introduced in other spots. In other words, ApiModelOutliner does not yet appear to be 100% effective so we'd need to keep our approach for the time being and thus revert back to AGP 7.2 in the interim.