Status Update
Comments
al...@google.com <al...@google.com>
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #2
And create a non-compose app will just works fine.
al...@google.com <al...@google.com> #3
al...@google.com <al...@google.com> #4
Same issue here, app crashes on start when using android-gradle 7.1.0-alpha04 and AS Canary 4
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #5
aurimas@, are you the right person for triaging Android Studio version-specific issues? I saw you upgraded AndroidX to Bumblebee Canary 3 last week. This bug report might be specific to Bumblebee Canary 4, I'm not certain.
al...@google.com <al...@google.com> #6
Tested this quickly locally, it seems that the studio template creates a project that crashes out of the box. Updating compose_version to 1.0.0-rc02
and kotlin-gradle-plugin to 1.5.10
fixed the crash for me locally. We likely want to update studio template to use the latest of compose and kotlin.
al...@google.com <al...@google.com> #7
Moving to studio component for triage.
This is a pretty bad user experience so ccing annachiarab@ to make sure this gets attention
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #8
It is likely to be addressed ag/Iafc18b104ff77fcd513d35db224d48f3b915a4e3
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #9
I am running into this same issue on a project using compose 1.0.0-rc02, kotlin-gradle-plugin 1.5.10, AGP 7.1.0-alpha04, and AS 2021.1.1 Canary 4. It is only when I install app from AS. When I build from gradle via command line, I can run the app just fine.
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #10
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #11
I test the case #9 describe with 1.0.0-rc01
and 1.0.0-rc02
It turns out that it is not related to the compose_version.
If you build from gradle via command line, it will just works fine.
But run in IDE it will crash.
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #12
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #13
I don't think this is an Android Studio issue. I updated three existing projects to AGP 7.1.0-alpha04 and all of them broke. They all throw the exception listed in the original report.
If I roll each project back to AGP 7.1.0-alpha03 they all work again, even if I build from AS Bumblebee 2021.1.1 Canary 4.
It certainly seems to be an AGP issue, to me.
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #14
I'm able to reproduce, looking into it now.
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #15
The issue is that AGP passes min api level 21 to D8 causing it to remove the default methods from DefaultLifecycleObserver
(make them abstract) but it does not pass desugaring classpath when rewriting invocations in AndroidComposeView.onAttachedToWindow
.
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #16
Another workaround is to change the deploy option from Default APK
to APK from app bundle
, then we could deploy to device via Android Studio.
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #17
Current workaround is to (temporarily) increase your minSdkVersion
to 24+ in build.gradle
file.
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #18
This issue isn't related to Canary 4. I had this issue with Canary 4 but uninstalled it and then installed Arctic Fox (2020.3.1) RC 1 and this issue was still there. Changing the minSdkVersion to 24+ does fix the problem.
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #19
To clarify, the issue is not in Android Studio (the IDE), but it is in the Android Gradle plugin.
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #20
al...@google.com <al...@google.com> #21
This is because when building from the IDE, AGP knows the API of the device which is used for deployment. This information is used to optimize the dexing pipeline (e.g avoid desugaring unless you run on device 23-). In AGP 7.1.0-alpha04 we introduced a bug where:
- the api version used for dexing is
minSdkVersion
e.g 21 - because we deploy to a device 24+ (e.g 30), desugaring is not requested
This means that D8 (dex compiler) will strip interface method and make them abstract, but it will not perform full rewriting, which leads to AbstractMethodError
.
When building from the command line, minSdkVersion used for dexing and deciding if desugaring should be performed is the same, so that's why you see no issues.
Description
We'd like to combine
current.txt
andpublic_plus_experimental.txt
, but we don't want to check compatibility for the APIs meta-annotated with@RequiresOptIn
.Our handling of APIs looks like this:
@RequiresOptIn
@RestrictTo(LIBRARY)
@RestrictTo(LIBRARY_GROUP)
@RestrictTo(LIBRARY_GROUP_PREFIX)
And the easiest way to implement Reviewed is to use separate files, which means we'll want to differentiate
@RequiresOptIn
.Tentatively, I'd like to pass a list of annotations (and meta-annotations) to Metalava. APIs with these annotations should not raise errors during compatibility checking. The annotations should not propagate to subclasses.