Status Update
Comments
al...@google.com <al...@google.com>
ga...@google.com <ga...@google.com> #2
This change should land in the androidx-main
branch.
ga...@google.com <ga...@google.com>
xi...@google.com <xi...@google.com> #3
UID team: This is independent of the platform release. Taking it off the V features.
xi...@google.com <xi...@google.com> #4
Gaurav, can you see if this should be prioritized?
ga...@google.com <ga...@google.com> #5
Yes, this should be prioritized. Its already more than a year since it was filed :).
bs...@google.com <bs...@google.com> #6
Hi @jainrachit, any update on this (and, by extension,
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #7
Project: platform/frameworks/support
Branch: androidx-main
Author: Rachit Jain <
Link:
Add SYSTEM_OVERLAYS to WindowInsetsCompat
Expand for full commit details
Add SYSTEM_OVERLAYS to WindowInsetsCompat
Relnote: Added API for SYSTEM_OVERLAYS
Bug: 287470173
Test: WindowInsetsCompatTest
Change-Id: Ibd1fd4a28dae7ccdc3193f1afcfac7b097265d71
Files:
- M
core/core/api/current.txt
- M
core/core/api/restricted_current.txt
- M
core/core/src/androidTest/java/androidx/core/view/WindowInsetsCompatTest.kt
- M
core/core/src/main/java/androidx/core/view/WindowInsetsCompat.java
Hash: 8f88d3c0efcbe5f4cbfbff78e1797b4f3568905a
Date: Thu Nov 14 14:39:16 2024
ja...@google.com <ja...@google.com> #8
Compose part (more or less ready) CL is out and is being tracked in another bug (
pr...@google.com <pr...@google.com> #9
The following release(s) address this bug.It is possible this bug has only been partially addressed:
androidx.core:core:1.16.0-alpha01
ja...@google.com <ja...@google.com> #10
Hi
Description
SYSTEM_OVERLAYS
insets type was recently made public inWindowInsets
as part of UDC. The code can beGENERIC_OVERLAYS
in android S (only in automotive branches -sc-car-dev
) and android T (only in automotive branches -tm-car-dev
). But it uses the same int value.The request is to make it available via androidx (WindowInsetsCompat) as well. Had a brief discussion with @alanv. This can be done and it should be a no-op for S and T on non-automotive devices.