Status Update
No update yet.
Comments
st...@gmail.com
1. Have you saw crash in real device or only in simulators?
2. Do you use dynamic feature for language ID?
st...@gmail.com
Tested on Android 12 Emulator with custom executor, but cannot repro this issue.
sg...@google.com
sg...@google.com
ap...@google.com
-
Second crash in the description is from a real device. Experienced it myself on two different Xiaomi phones, plus lots of crashes from users in the Google Play console.
-
Dynamic features are not used in the application.
As a wild guess, I have downgraded build tools from 31.0.0 to 30.0.3, compileSdk from 31 to 30, and moved all work with Language ID to the service in a separate process (just to be sure that crash can kill secondary process instead of main). This combination is in beta for 2 days by now and I don't see any SIGSEGV crashes.
sg...@google.com
st...@gmail.com
Hmm, I feel the crash might be something related to separate/secondary process.
I also changed compileSdk and targetSDK to 31 but still cannot repro this issue.
sg...@google.com
On the contrary, there was no separate process before, when crashes started.
In the new build (with the aforementioned changes) I can see SIGSEGV crash, but only one instead of dozens and it has a bit different backtrace:
signal 11 (SIGSEGV), code 1 (SEGV_MAPERR)
liblanguage_id_jni.so (offset 0x11e000)
backtrace:
#00 pc 000000000003c7c0 /data/app/azagroup.reedy-mF7zTu2bv_ELlbFArwNgqA==/split_config.arm64_v8a.apk!lib/arm64-v8a/liblanguage_id_jni.so (offset 0x11e000)
#00 pc 000000000003b960 /data/app/azagroup.reedy-mF7zTu2bv_ELlbFArwNgqA==/split_config.arm64_v8a.apk!lib/arm64-v8a/liblanguage_id_jni.so (offset 0x11e000)
#00 pc 000000000003bb48 /data/app/azagroup.reedy-mF7zTu2bv_ELlbFArwNgqA==/split_config.arm64_v8a.apk!lib/arm64-v8a/liblanguage_id_jni.so (offset 0x11e000)
#00 pc 000000000003bafc /data/app/azagroup.reedy-mF7zTu2bv_ELlbFArwNgqA==/split_config.arm64_v8a.apk!lib/arm64-v8a/liblanguage_id_jni.so (offset 0x11e000)
#00 pc 0000000000036c98 /data/app/azagroup.reedy-mF7zTu2bv_ELlbFArwNgqA==/split_config.arm64_v8a.apk!lib/arm64-v8a/liblanguage_id_jni.so (offset 0x11e000)
#00 pc 0000000000032714 /data/app/azagroup.reedy-mF7zTu2bv_ELlbFArwNgqA==/split_config.arm64_v8a.apk!lib/arm64-v8a/liblanguage_id_jni.so (offset 0x11e000)
#00 pc 0000000000031cac /data/app/azagroup.reedy-mF7zTu2bv_ELlbFArwNgqA==/split_config.arm64_v8a.apk!lib/arm64-v8a/liblanguage_id_jni.so (offset 0x11e000)
#00 pc 0000000000057438 /data/app/azagroup.reedy-mF7zTu2bv_ELlbFArwNgqA==/oat/arm64/base.odex (offset 0x57000)
Description
Jetpack Compose version: 1.2.0-alpha03
Jetpack Compose component used: androidx.compose.material3:material3
Android Studio Build: N/A
Kotlin version: N/A
DatePickerState used to be a public class, now in 1.2.x it is an interface. Before I was constructing an instance of this class in a state holding class (as described in the docshttps://developer.android.com/jetpack/compose/state#managing-state )
Now I can no longer do that, since DatePickerStateImpl is private, and the only exposed way to construct one with the rememberDatePickerState(), which is a composable function.
I feel like it should not only be possible to construct those state objects in composition. Hoisting this state into my own state holder has been super useful to be able to control the state there, and have the composables themselves use the state as it is, without constructing it and dealing with logic like which dates are allowed etc. and simply emit the UI as it should be.
Can this scenario please be considered? The docs that I linked above even are the ones who promote the idea of having these state holders, so the material3 library disallowing it for specifically the date picker component feels quite out of place.