Change theme
Help
Press space for more information.
Show links for this issue (Shortcut: i, l)
Copy issue ID
Previous Issue (Shortcut: k)
Next Issue (Shortcut: j)
Sign in to use full features.
Vote: I am impacted
Notification menu
Refresh (Shortcut: Shift+r)
Go home (Shortcut: u)
Pending code changes (auto-populated)
View issue level access limits(Press Alt + Right arrow for more information)
Unintended behavior
View staffing
Description
anchorX0, anchorY0
controlX0, controlY0
controlX1, controlY1
anchorX1, controlY1
The concept behind this naming (specifying anchors, controls, and XY components) is fine. But the placement of XY and 01 is backwards. It is not the 0th X component (eg, anchorX0), but rather the 0th *anchor*, which has an X component.
These should be renamed as follows:
anchor0X, anchor0Y
control0X, control0Y
control1X, control1Y
anchor1X, anchor1Y