Fixed
Status Update
Comments
ra...@google.com <ra...@google.com>
di...@google.com <di...@google.com>
jg...@google.com <jg...@google.com> #2
an...@google.com <an...@google.com> #3
For Android-imposed version restrictions we should override that using AndroidLanguageFeatureProvider (and if the feature provider scheme isn't supported for a particular inspection, upstreaming a patch to add that).
Description
Relates to this issue on cashapp/paparazzi:https://github.com/cashapp/paparazzi/issues/622
In particular, this comment:https://github.com/cashapp/paparazzi/issues/622#issuecomment-1551872561
Doing a naive search across layoutlib sources for hamcrest shows nothing:
Doing a naive search across layoutlib sources for junit (which pulls in hamcrest as a transitive dependency) shows references in test sources (to be expected):
Is it possible that layoutlib is accidentally bundling its test dependencies in the binary?