IssueTracker

Relates to this issue on cashapp/paparazzi: https://github.com/cashapp/paparazzi/issues/622

In particular, this comment: https://github.com/cashapp/paparazzi/issues/622#issuecomment-1551872561

Doing a naive search across layoutlib sources for hamcrest shows nothing:

• https://cs.android.com/search?q=org.hamcrest&sq=&ss=android%2Fplatform%2Fsuperproject%2Fmain:frameworks%2Flayoutlib%2F
• https://cs.android.com/search?q=org.hamcrest&ss=android-studio%2Fplatform%2Ftools%2Fadt%2Fidea:layoutlib%2F

Doing a naive search across layoutlib sources for junit (which pulls in hamcrest as a transitive dependency) shows references in test sources (to be expected):

• https://cs.android.com/search?q=org.junit&sq=&ss=android%2Fplatform%2Fsuperproject%2Fmain:frameworks%2Flayoutlib%2F
• https://cs.android.com/search?q=org.junit&ss=android-studio%2Fplatform%2Ftools%2Fadt%2Fidea:layoutlib%2F

Is it possible that layoutlib is accidentally bundling its test dependencies in the binary?