Failed to stop [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=...)] [323601788]

Fixed

Bug

Status Update

No update yet.

Description

cc...@google.com

created issue #1

Feb 2, 2024 11:57PM

Split off independent issue from reports in b/244621251#comment6 and b/244621251#comment7

Have an internal report of this at b/307649002

From that conversation, issue is likely that Macrobenchmark's perfetto death timeout of 3 seconds doesn't align with perfetto's 5s for stopping producers.

We should first try and resolve that, and can sort out what appears to be a producer problem after.

Comments

ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #2Feb 5, 2024 03:28PM

Any suggestions on where such an interface might live? I don't think it makes sense for the interface to be in the drawerlayout artifact if you're specifically going to use the interface to *not* use DrawerLayout.

cc...@google.com <cc...@google.com> #3Mar 4, 2024 06:55PM

androidx.customview would be a good candidate. This is used by all of the widget libraries.

lu...@meta.com <lu...@meta.com> #4Mar 12, 2024 04:44PM

Project: platform/frameworks/support
Branch: androidx-master-dev

commit 3ed3fb003fa6c1244f923202859a616225b5b2fa
Author: Ian Lake <ilake@google.com>
Date: Fri Feb 14 11:17:46 2020

Create an interface for layouts that can be opened

Create a common interface that represents layouts
that have two states: open and closed. This allows
higher level libraries to rely on the interface,
rather than concrete implementations such as
DrawerLayout, making them more resilient to
changes in the current recommended implementation.

Fixes: 129979320
Test: ./gradlew checkApi
Change-Id: I0f2a1414977825aa053c6555261f2b7d4417bd19

M customview/customview/api/1.1.0-alpha02.txt
M customview/customview/api/current.txt
M customview/customview/api/public_plus_experimental_1.1.0-alpha02.txt
M customview/customview/api/public_plus_experimental_current.txt
M customview/customview/api/restricted_1.1.0-alpha02.txt
M customview/customview/api/restricted_current.txt
A customview/customview/src/main/java/androidx/customview/widget/Openable.java
M drawerlayout/drawerlayout/api/1.1.0-alpha03.txt
M drawerlayout/drawerlayout/api/current.txt
M drawerlayout/drawerlayout/api/public_plus_experimental_1.1.0-alpha03.txt
M drawerlayout/drawerlayout/api/public_plus_experimental_current.txt
M drawerlayout/drawerlayout/api/restricted_1.1.0-alpha03.txt
M drawerlayout/drawerlayout/api/restricted_current.txt
M drawerlayout/drawerlayout/build.gradle
M drawerlayout/drawerlayout/src/main/java/androidx/drawerlayout/widget/DrawerLayout.java
M jetifier/jetifier/migration.config
M slidingpanelayout/slidingpanelayout/api/1.1.0-alpha01.txt
M slidingpanelayout/slidingpanelayout/api/current.txt
M slidingpanelayout/slidingpanelayout/api/public_plus_experimental_1.1.0-alpha01.txt
M slidingpanelayout/slidingpanelayout/api/public_plus_experimental_current.txt
M slidingpanelayout/slidingpanelayout/api/restricted_1.1.0-alpha01.txt
M slidingpanelayout/slidingpanelayout/api/restricted_current.txt
M slidingpanelayout/slidingpanelayout/src/main/java/androidx/slidingpanelayout/widget/SlidingPaneLayout.java

https://android-review.googlesource.com/940787

Message last modified on Mar 12, 2024 04:44PM

cc...@google.com <cc...@google.com> #5Mar 13, 2024 08:07PM

@ #comment4 - can you attach logcat of a scenario where this reproduces? If necessary, you can filter it to perfetto/PerfettoCapture/Benchmark tags.

How reproducible is this, and on which devices and OS versions?

lu...@gmail.com <lu...@gmail.com> #6Jun 1, 2024 06:10PM

I'm facing the same issue. Device: Pixel 8 Pro Android 15 - Build Number: AP31.240426.023 Stack:

java.lang.IllegalStateException: Failed to stop [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)]
at androidx.benchmark.Shell.terminateProcessesAndWait(Shell.kt:612)
at androidx.benchmark.Shell.terminateProcessesAndWait(Shell.kt:581)
at androidx.benchmark.perfetto.PerfettoHelper$Companion.stopAllPerfettoProcesses(PerfettoHelper.kt:441)
at androidx.benchmark.perfetto.PerfettoHelper.startCollecting(PerfettoHelper.kt:91)
at androidx.benchmark.perfetto.PerfettoCapture.start(PerfettoCapture.kt:73)
at androidx.benchmark.perfetto.PerfettoCaptureWrapper.start(PerfettoCaptureWrapper.kt:80)
at androidx.benchmark.perfetto.PerfettoCaptureWrapper.record(PerfettoCaptureWrapper.kt:136)
at androidx.benchmark.perfetto.PerfettoCaptureWrapper.record$default(PerfettoCaptureWrapper.kt:101)
at androidx.benchmark.junit4.BenchmarkRule$applyInternal$$inlined$Statement$1.evaluate(BenchmarkRule.kt:442)
at androidx.test.rule.GrantPermissionRule$RequestPermissionStatement.evaluate(GrantPermissionRule.java:136)
at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner$1.evaluate(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:100)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:366)
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:103)
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:63)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
at androidx.test.ext.junit.runners.AndroidJUnit4.run(AndroidJUnit4.java:162)
at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:128)
at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:27)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:137)
at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:115)
at androidx.test.internal.runner.TestExecutor.execute(TestExecutor.java:67)
at androidx.test.internal.runner.TestExecutor.execute(TestExecutor.java:58)
at androidx.test.runner.AndroidJUnitRunner.onStart(AndroidJUnitRunner.java:446)
at android.app.Instrumentation$InstrumentationThread.run(Instrumentation.java:2594)

Log from Logcat:

2024-06-01 19:08:00.528 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  launching Benchmark IsolationActivity
2024-06-01 19:08:00.554 10362-10422 vulkan                  com.performance.benchmark.test       D  searching for layers in '/data/app/~~BWq1z3HXtczxQa9ZQjpLhA==/com.performance.benchmark.test-PKZxIOqbb6y3ykj-YzNhBA==/lib/arm64'
2024-06-01 19:08:00.554 10362-10422 vulkan                  com.performance.benchmark.test       D  searching for layers in '/data/app/~~BWq1z3HXtczxQa9ZQjpLhA==/com.performance.benchmark.test-PKZxIOqbb6y3ykj-YzNhBA==/base.apk!/lib/arm64-v8a'
2024-06-01 19:08:00.563 10362-10362 LifecycleMonitor        com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Lifecycle status change: androidx.benchmark.IsolationActivity@f8698f1 in: PRE_ON_CREATE
2024-06-01 19:08:00.572 10362-10362 .benchmark.test         com.performance.benchmark.test       E  Invalid resource ID 0x00000000.
2024-06-01 19:08:00.579 10362-10362 CompatChangeReporter    com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Compat change id reported: 309578419; UID 10004; state: DISABLED
2024-06-01 19:08:00.582 10362-10362 CompatChangeReporter    com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Compat change id reported: 210923482; UID 10004; state: ENABLED
2024-06-01 19:08:00.582 10362-10362 CompatChangeReporter    com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Compat change id reported: 63938206; UID 10004; state: DISABLED
2024-06-01 19:08:01.357 10362-10362 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Clocks not locked: online cores with min freq == min avail freq
2024-06-01 19:08:01.357 10362-10362 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  cpu0 CoreDir(path=/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu7, online=true, availableFreqs=[402000, 578000, 697000, 712000, 910000, 1065000, 1221000, 1328000, 1418000, 1572000, 1836000, 1945000, 2130000, 2245000, 2367000], setSpeedKhz=402000, maxFreqKhz=2367000)
2024-06-01 19:08:01.357 10362-10362 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  cpu1 CoreDir(path=/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu5, online=true, availableFreqs=[402000, 578000, 697000, 712000, 910000, 1065000, 1221000, 1328000, 1418000, 1572000, 1836000, 1945000, 2130000, 2245000, 2367000], setSpeedKhz=402000, maxFreqKhz=2367000)
2024-06-01 19:08:01.357 10362-10362 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  cpu2 CoreDir(path=/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3, online=true, availableFreqs=[324000, 610000, 820000, 955000, 1098000, 1197000, 1328000, 1425000, 1548000, 1704000], setSpeedKhz=324000, maxFreqKhz=1704000)
2024-06-01 19:08:01.357 10362-10362 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  cpu3 CoreDir(path=/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1, online=true, availableFreqs=[324000, 610000, 820000, 955000, 1098000, 1197000, 1328000, 1425000, 1548000, 1704000], setSpeedKhz=324000, maxFreqKhz=1704000)
2024-06-01 19:08:01.357 10362-10362 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  cpu4 CoreDir(path=/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu8, online=true, availableFreqs=[500000, 880000, 1164000, 1298000, 1557000, 1745000, 1885000, 2049000, 2147000, 2294000, 2363000, 2556000, 2687000, 2850000, 2914000], setSpeedKhz=500000, maxFreqKhz=2914000)
2024-06-01 19:08:01.357 10362-10362 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  cpu5 CoreDir(path=/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu6, online=true, availableFreqs=[402000, 578000, 697000, 712000, 910000, 1065000, 1221000, 1328000, 1418000, 1572000, 1836000, 1945000, 2130000, 2245000, 2367000], setSpeedKhz=402000, maxFreqKhz=2367000)
2024-06-01 19:08:01.357 10362-10362 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  cpu6 CoreDir(path=/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu4, online=true, availableFreqs=[402000, 578000, 697000, 712000, 910000, 1065000, 1221000, 1328000, 1418000, 1572000, 1836000, 1945000, 2130000, 2245000, 2367000], setSpeedKhz=402000, maxFreqKhz=2367000)
2024-06-01 19:08:01.357 10362-10362 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  cpu7 CoreDir(path=/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2, online=true, availableFreqs=[324000, 610000, 820000, 955000, 1098000, 1197000, 1328000, 1425000, 1548000, 1704000], setSpeedKhz=324000, maxFreqKhz=1704000)
2024-06-01 19:08:01.357 10362-10362 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  cpu8 CoreDir(path=/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0, online=true, availableFreqs=[324000, 610000, 820000, 955000, 1098000, 1197000, 1328000, 1425000, 1548000, 1704000], setSpeedKhz=324000, maxFreqKhz=1704000)
2024-06-01 19:08:01.359 10362-10362 LifecycleMonitor        com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Lifecycle status change: androidx.benchmark.IsolationActivity@f8698f1 in: CREATED
2024-06-01 19:08:01.359 10362-10362 LifecycleMonitor        com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Lifecycle status change: androidx.benchmark.IsolationActivity@f8698f1 in: STARTED
2024-06-01 19:08:01.361 10362-10362 LifecycleMonitor        com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Lifecycle status change: androidx.benchmark.IsolationActivity@f8698f1 in: RESUMED
2024-06-01 19:08:01.365 10362-10362 CompatChangeReporter    com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Compat change id reported: 237531167; UID 10004; state: DISABLED
2024-06-01 19:08:01.426 10362-10380 GrantPermissionCallable com.performance.benchmark.test       I  Permission: android.permission.READ_EXTERNAL_STORAGE is already granted!
2024-06-01 19:08:01.426 10362-10380 GrantPermissionCallable com.performance.benchmark.test       I  Permission: android.permission.WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE is already granted!
2024-06-01 19:08:01.426 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  -- Running com.performance.benchmark.ExampleBenchmark#log --
2024-06-01 19:08:01.427 10362-10380 PerfettoCapture         com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Supported ABIs: arm64-v8a
2024-06-01 19:08:01.427 10362-10380 PerfettoCapture         com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Recording perfetto trace
2024-06-01 19:08:01.446 10362-10380 PerfettoCapture         com.performance.benchmark.test       I  Cleanup perfetto before starting.
2024-06-01 19:08:01.558 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  kill -TERM command output - Output(stdout=, stderr=/storage/emulated/0/Android/media/com.performance.benchmark.test/temporaryScript5455895838492548174.tmp[2]: kill: 11267: Operation not permitted
                                                                                                    )
2024-06-01 19:08:01.725 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:01.759 10362-10572 InteractionJankMonitor  com.performance.benchmark.test       W  Initializing without READ_DEVICE_CONFIG permission. enabled=false, interval=1, missedFrameThreshold=3, frameTimeThreshold=64, package=com.performance.benchmark.test
2024-06-01 19:08:01.865 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:02.019 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:02.156 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:02.292 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:02.433 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:02.583 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:02.729 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:02.877 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:03.024 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:03.169 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:03.323 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:03.480 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:03.638 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:03.806 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:03.961 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:04.113 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:04.263 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:04.419 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:04.584 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:04.748 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:04.900 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:05.064 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:05.226 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:05.384 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:05.550 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:05.641 10362-10673 ProfileInstaller        com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Installing profile for com.performance.benchmark.test
2024-06-01 19:08:05.717 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:05.873 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:06.035 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:06.185 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:06.346 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:06.512 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:06.679 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:06.836 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:07.000 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:07.146 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:07.314 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:07.487 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:07.652 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:07.814 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:07.979 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:08.148 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:08.316 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:08.477 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:08.640 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:08.808 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:08.970 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:09.131 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:09.299 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:09.447 10362-10380 Benchmark               com.performance.benchmark.test       D  Waiting 100 ms for [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] to die
2024-06-01 19:08:09.496 10362-10380 TestRunner              com.performance.benchmark.test       E  failed: log(com.performance.benchmark.ExampleBenchmark)
2024-06-01 19:08:09.496 10362-10380 TestRunner              com.performance.benchmark.test       E  ----- begin exception -----
2024-06-01 19:08:09.500 10362-10380 TestRunner              com.performance.benchmark.test       E  java.lang.IllegalStateException: Failed to stop [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=11267)] (Ask Gemini)
                                                                                                    	at androidx.benchmark.Shell.terminateProcessesAndWait(Shell.kt:612)
                                                                                                    	at androidx.benchmark.Shell.terminateProcessesAndWait(Shell.kt:581)
                                                                                                    	at androidx.benchmark.perfetto.PerfettoHelper$Companion.stopAllPerfettoProcesses(PerfettoHelper.kt:441)
                                                                                                    	at androidx.benchmark.perfetto.PerfettoHelper.startCollecting(PerfettoHelper.kt:91)
                                                                                                    	at androidx.benchmark.perfetto.PerfettoCapture.start(PerfettoCapture.kt:73)
                                                                                                    	at androidx.benchmark.perfetto.PerfettoCaptureWrapper.start(PerfettoCaptureWrapper.kt:80)
                                                                                                    	at androidx.benchmark.perfetto.PerfettoCaptureWrapper.record(PerfettoCaptureWrapper.kt:136)
                                                                                                    	at androidx.benchmark.perfetto.PerfettoCaptureWrapper.record$default(PerfettoCaptureWrapper.kt:101)
                                                                                                    	at androidx.benchmark.junit4.BenchmarkRule$applyInternal$$inlined$Statement$1.evaluate(BenchmarkRule.kt:442)
                                                                                                    	at androidx.test.rule.GrantPermissionRule$RequestPermissionStatement.evaluate(GrantPermissionRule.java:136)
                                                                                                    	at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20)
                                                                                                    	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
                                                                                                    	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner$1.evaluate(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:100)
                                                                                                    	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:366)
                                                                                                    	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:103)
                                                                                                    	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:63)
                                                                                                    	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
                                                                                                    	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
                                                                                                    	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
                                                                                                    	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
                                                                                                    	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
                                                                                                    	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
                                                                                                    	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
                                                                                                    	at androidx.test.ext.junit.runners.AndroidJUnit4.run(AndroidJUnit4.java:162)
                                                                                                    	at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:128)
                                                                                                    	at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:27)
                                                                                                    	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
                                                                                                    	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
                                                                                                    	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
                                                                                                    	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
                                                                                                    	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
                                                                                                    	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
                                                                                                    	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
                                                                                                    	at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:137)
                                                                                                    	at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:115)
                                                                                                    	at androidx.test.internal.runner.TestExecutor.execute(TestExecutor.java:67)
                                                                                                    	at androidx.test.internal.runner.TestExecutor.execute(TestExecutor.java:58)
                                                                                                    	at androidx.test.runner.AndroidJUnitRunner.onStart(AndroidJUnitRunner.java:446)
                                                                                                    	at android.app.Instrumentation$InstrumentationThread.run(Instrumentation.java:2594)
2024-06-01 19:08:09.500 10362-10380 TestRunner              com.performance.benchmark.test       E  ----- end exception -----
2024-06-01 19:08:09.504 10362-10380 TestRunner              com.performance.benchmark.test       I  finished: log(com.performance.benchmark.ExampleBenchmark)
2024-06-01 19:08:09.514 10362-10362 MonitoringInstr         com.performance.benchmark.test       I  Finishing activity: androidx.benchmark.IsolationActivity@f8698f1
2024-06-01 19:08:09.515 10362-10380 TestRunner              com.performance.benchmark.test       I  run finished: 1 tests, 1 failed, 0 ignored
2024-06-01 19:08:09.519 10362-10362 MonitoringInstr         com.performance.benchmark.test       I  Finishing activity: androidx.benchmark.IsolationActivity@f8698f1

Message last modified on Jun 1, 2024 06:11PM

ke...@netflix.com <ke...@netflix.com> #7Jul 5, 2024 07:01PM

Same with 1.3.0-beta01
```
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Failed to stop [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=19422)]
at androidx.benchmark.Shell.terminateProcessesAndWait(Shell.kt:617)
```

I am trying to use a wrapper rule that can do some postprocessing on the macrobenchmark json before it sends to our servers instead of doing this in CI though.
Wrapper rule is pretty trivial:
```

class StatsDtaMacrobenchmarkRule : TestRule {
val macrobenchmarkRule: MacrobenchmarkRule = MacrobenchmarkRule()

override fun apply(
base: Statement,
description: Description,
): Statement = object : Statement() {
@Throws(Throwable::class)
override fun evaluate() {
before()
try {
macrobenchmarkRule.apply(base, description).evaluate()
} finally {
after()
}
}
}

/**
* Forwards to [MacrobenchmarkRule.measureRepeated]
*/
@JvmOverloads
fun measureRepeated(
packageName: String,
metrics: List<Metric>,
compilationMode: CompilationMode = CompilationMode.DEFAULT,
startupMode: StartupMode? = null,
@IntRange(from = 1)
iterations: Int,
setupBlock: MacrobenchmarkScope.() -> Unit = {},
measureBlock: MacrobenchmarkScope.() -> Unit,
) {
macrobenchmarkRule.measureRepeated(
packageName,
metrics,
compilationMode,
startupMode,
iterations,
setupBlock,
measureBlock,
)
}

private fun before() {
// Custom code to run before the nested rules
}

private fun after() {
// Custom code to run after the nested rules
val logcat = captureLogcat()
val regex = Regex(".*/(.+\\.json)")
val matchResult = regex.find(logcat)
val filename = matchResult?.groups?.get(1)?.value
filename?.let {
logV { "Macrobenchmark Filename: $it" }
} ?: logE { "Unable to find macrobenchmark file in logs!" }
}

private fun captureLogcat(): String {
val logcatProcess = Runtime.getRuntime().exec("logcat -d")
val bufferedReader = BufferedReader(InputStreamReader(logcatProcess.inputStream))

val logcatOutput = StringBuilder()
bufferedReader.useLines { lines ->
lines.forEach { line ->
logcatOutput.append(line).append("\n")
}
}

return logcatOutput.toString()
}

private companion object : LogCompanion("StatsDtaMacrobenchmarkRule")
}
```

ke...@netflix.com <ke...@netflix.com> #8Jul 5, 2024 07:06PM

But even using just the MacrobenchmarkRule, it has the same issue w/ perfectto process not being killed...

ke...@netflix.com <ke...@netflix.com> #9Jul 5, 2024 07:17PM

Running killall in an adb shell doesn't work too:
```
$ killall perfetto
killall: pid 19422: Operation not permitted
killall: perfetto: Operation not permitted
```

ke...@netflix.com <ke...@netflix.com> #10Jul 5, 2024 07:24PM

restarting the device also doesn't seem to help

ke...@netflix.com <ke...@netflix.com> #11Jul 5, 2024 07:35PM

Forgot to mention my device: Pixel7 latest Android 15 beta, build API31.240517.031
Device is not rooted.

From the logs, it seems like the test doesn't have permissions needed to kill the perfetto process. It probably should send an IPC call to it to kill it (if perfectto has that capability).

ke...@netflix.com <ke...@netflix.com> #12Jul 5, 2024 08:53PM

Workaround for me was try a different device. Samsung S23 Ultra w/ Android 14 works w/o that perfetto kill permission error.

al...@intive.com <al...@intive.com> Sep 3, 2024 10:17AM

test-run-1.log

93 KB

View

Download

test-run-2.log

207 KB

View

Download

deleted

0 B

deleted

0 B

al...@intive.com <al...@intive.com> #13Sep 4, 2024 11:36AM

Experiencing the same issue.

Stacktrace:

java.lang.IllegalStateException: Failed to stop [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=24965)]
at androidx.benchmark.Shell.terminateProcessesAndWait(Shell.kt:617)
at androidx.benchmark.Shell.terminateProcessesAndWait(Shell.kt:587)
at androidx.benchmark.perfetto.PerfettoHelper$Companion.stopAllPerfettoProcesses(PerfettoHelper.kt:470)
at androidx.benchmark.perfetto.PerfettoHelper.startCollecting(PerfettoHelper.kt:85)
at androidx.benchmark.perfetto.PerfettoCapture.start(PerfettoCapture.kt:69)
at androidx.benchmark.perfetto.PerfettoCaptureWrapper.start(PerfettoCaptureWrapper.kt:76)
at androidx.benchmark.perfetto.PerfettoCaptureWrapper.record(PerfettoCaptureWrapper.kt:131)
at androidx.benchmark.perfetto.PerfettoCaptureWrapper.record$default(PerfettoCaptureWrapper.kt:95)
at androidx.benchmark.macro.MacrobenchmarkPhaseKt.runPhase(MacrobenchmarkPhase.kt:105)
at androidx.benchmark.macro.MacrobenchmarkKt$macrobenchmark$4.invoke(Macrobenchmark.kt:258)
at androidx.benchmark.macro.MacrobenchmarkKt$macrobenchmark$4.invoke(Macrobenchmark.kt:255)
at androidx.benchmark.perfetto.PerfettoTraceProcessor$Companion.runServer-VtjQ1oo(PerfettoTraceProcessor.kt:133)
at androidx.benchmark.perfetto.PerfettoTraceProcessor$Companion.runServer(PerfettoTraceProcessor.kt:108)
at androidx.benchmark.macro.MacrobenchmarkKt.macrobenchmark(Macrobenchmark.kt:255)
at androidx.benchmark.macro.MacrobenchmarkKt.macrobenchmarkWithStartupMode(Macrobenchmark.kt:392)
at androidx.benchmark.macro.junit4.MacrobenchmarkRule.measureRepeated(MacrobenchmarkRule.kt:108)
at com.example.baselineprofile.StartupBenchmarks.benchmark(StartupBenchmarks.kt:52)
at com.example.baselineprofile.StartupBenchmarks.startupCompilationNone(StartupBenchmarks.kt:44)

Versions:

androidx.benchmark:benchmark-macro-junit4:1.3.0
AGP: 8.6.0
Android Studio: Android Studio Koala Feature Drop | 2024.1.2

Device:

Google Pixel 6 Pro
Android 15
Android security update: August 5, 2024
Google Play system update: July 1, 2024
Kernel version:
5.10.210-android13-4-03254-g38965378c80a-ab11958173
#1 Wed Jun 12 03:24:21 UTC 2024
Build number: AP41.240726.010
Not rooted

The full logs of two test runs can be found in the attachments of the previous comment.

This section in the logs seems interesting:

09-03 11:09:10.873 10922 10942 D PerfettoCapture: Supported ABIs: arm64-v8a, armeabi-v7a, armeabi
09-03 11:09:10.873 10922 10942 D PerfettoCapture: Recording perfetto trace
09-03 11:09:10.873 27764 10817 I NetworkScheduler.Stats: (REDACTED) Task %s/%s started execution. cause:%s exec_start_elapsed_seconds: %s
09-03 11:09:10.876 27764 10713 I NetworkScheduler.Stats: (REDACTED) Task %s/%s finished executing. cause:%s result: %s elapsed_millis: %s uptime_millis: %s exec_start_elapsed_seconds: %s
09-03 11:09:10.890  4184  5455 W MediaProvider: isAppCloneUserPair for user 0: false
09-03 11:09:10.895 10922 10942 I PerfettoCapture: Cleanup perfetto before starting.
09-03 11:09:10.934 27764 10817 I NetworkScheduler.Stats: (REDACTED) Task %s/%s started execution. cause:%s exec_start_elapsed_seconds: %s
09-03 11:09:10.938 27764 11369 I NetworkScheduler.Stats: (REDACTED) Task %s/%s finished executing. cause:%s result: %s elapsed_millis: %s uptime_millis: %s exec_start_elapsed_seconds: %s
09-03 11:09:10.966  4184 30886 W MediaProvider: isAppCloneUserPair for user 0: false
09-03 11:09:11.003  1109  1109 I WifiHAL : Creating message to get link statistics; iface = 47
09-03 11:09:11.019 27764 10817 I NetworkScheduler.Stats: (REDACTED) Task %s/%s started execution. cause:%s exec_start_elapsed_seconds: %s
09-03 11:09:11.023 27764 10820 I NetworkScheduler.Stats: (REDACTED) Task %s/%s finished executing. cause:%s result: %s elapsed_millis: %s uptime_millis: %s exec_start_elapsed_seconds: %s
09-03 11:09:11.045  4184 30886 W MediaProvider: Ignoring param:deletedata post U for external apps
09-03 11:09:11.048  4184 30886 I MediaProvider: Invalidating LocalCallingIdentity cache for package com.example.baselineprofile. Reason: owned_database_row_deleted:/storage/emulated/0/Android/media/com.example.baselineprofile/temporaryScript3723391827797421641.tmp
09-03 11:09:11.051  4184 30886 I MediaProvider: Deleted 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 items on external_primary due to com.android.shell
09-03 11:09:11.054 10922 10942 D Benchmark: kill -TERM command output - Output(stdout=, stderr=/storage/emulated/0/Android/media/com.example.baselineprofile/temporaryScript3723391827797421641.tmp[2]: kill: 24965: Operation not permitted
09-03 11:09:11.054 10922 10942 D Benchmark: )

It looks like PerfettoCapture is trying to kill an already running instance of perfetto, but it doesn't have the rights to do so (last log line).

Listing running perfetto processes on the device after the test run shows:

adb -d shell ps | grep perfetto
statsd       15678     1   10846896   4480 0                   0 S perfetto
statsd       24965     1   10814128   3208 0                   0 S perfetto

The process ID of the second process matches the ID in the Stacktrace above. So PerfettoCapture tried to stop this one, but didn't have permission to do so.

Trying to kill these process via adb is also not permitted:

$ adb -d shell kill 24965
/system/bin/sh: kill: 24965: Operation not permitted

$ adb -d shell kill 15678
/system/bin/sh: kill: 15678: Operation not permitted

The user that owns the process seems to be statsd. This looks like the Statsd module. It seems to be responsible for running the perfetto process that can't be killed.

This is likely what comment #9 is also pointing at.

I don't have any other hardware devices with me for comparison runs.

When running the test on an Emulator, the log shows this:

09-03 12:06:55.431 10498 10516 D PerfettoCapture: Supported ABIs: arm64-v8a
09-03 12:06:55.431 10498 10516 D PerfettoCapture: Recording perfetto trace
09-03 12:06:55.435  1479  8742 W MediaProvider: isAppCloneUserPair for user 0: false
09-03 12:06:55.436 10498 10516 I PerfettoCapture: Cleanup perfetto before starting.
09-03 12:06:55.445  1285 10327 I NetworkScheduler.Stats: (REDACTED) Task %s/%s started execution. cause:%s exec_start_elapsed_seconds: %s
09-03 12:06:55.446  1285 10578 I NetworkScheduler.Stats: (REDACTED) Task %s/%s finished executing. cause:%s result: %s elapsed_millis: %s uptime_millis: %s exec_start_elapsed_seconds: %s
09-03 12:06:55.453  1479  8742 W MediaProvider: isAppCloneUserPair for user 0: false
09-03 12:06:55.464  1285 10327 I NetworkScheduler.Stats: (REDACTED) Task %s/%s started execution. cause:%s exec_start_elapsed_seconds: %s
09-03 12:06:55.466  1285  3618 I NetworkScheduler.Stats: (REDACTED) Task %s/%s finished executing. cause:%s result: %s elapsed_millis: %s uptime_millis: %s exec_start_elapsed_seconds: %s
09-03 12:06:55.474  1479  2128 I MediaProvider: Invalidating LocalCallingIdentity cache for package com.example.baselineprofile. Reason: owned_database_row_deleted:/storage/emulated/0/Android/media/com.example.baselineprofile/temporaryScript2502516040961053018.tmp
09-03 12:06:55.474  1479  2128 I MediaProvider: Deleted 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 items on external_primary due to com.android.shell
09-03 12:06:55.475 10498 10516 I PerfettoCapture: Starting perfetto tracing with cmd: cat /storage/emulated/0/Android/media/com.example.baselineprofile/trace_config.pb | perfetto --background-wait -c - -o /data/misc/perfetto-traces/trace_output.pb
09-03 12:06:55.478  1479  8742 W MediaProvider: isAppCloneUserPair for user 0: false
09-03 12:06:55.484  1285 10327 I NetworkScheduler.Stats: (REDACTED) Task %s/%s started execution. cause:%s exec_start_elapsed_seconds: %s
09-03 12:06:55.486  1285  3618 I NetworkScheduler.Stats: (REDACTED) Task %s/%s finished executing. cause:%s result: %s elapsed_millis: %s uptime_millis: %s exec_start_elapsed_seconds: %s
09-03 12:06:55.484 11210 11210 W perfetto: type=1400 audit(0.0:455): avc:  denied  { write } for  path="/data/local/tmp/temporaryScript4626443941097950496.tmp_stderr" dev="dm-39" ino=65625 scontext=u:r:perfetto:s0 tcontext=u:object_r:shell_data_file:s0 tclass=file permissive=0
09-03 12:06:55.493 11211 11211 I perfetto:    perfetto_cmd.cc:1053 Connected to the Perfetto traced service, starting tracing
09-03 12:06:55.493   444   444 I perfetto: ng_service_impl.cc:1042 Configured tracing session 22, #sources:9, duration:0 ms, #buffers:2, total buffer size:36864 KB, total sessions:1, uid:2000 session name: ""
09-03 12:06:55.493   432   432 I perfetto:  probes_producer.cc:141 Ftrace setup (target_buf=43)
09-03 12:06:55.492   432   432 W traced_probes: type=1400 audit(0.0:456): avc:  denied  { read } for  name="current_tracer" dev="tracefs" ino=9295 scontext=u:r:traced_probes:s0 tcontext=u:object_r:debugfs_tracing_debug:s0 tclass=file permissive=0
09-03 12:06:55.493   432   432 I perfetto:    ftrace_procfs.cc:445 disabled ftrace in /sys/kernel/tracing/
09-03 12:06:55.708   432   432 W traced_probes: type=1400 audit(0.0:457): avc:  denied  { read } for  name="format" dev="tracefs" ino=8233 scontext=u:r:traced_probes:s0 tcontext=u:object_r:debugfs_tracing_debug:s0 tclass=file permissive=0
09-03 12:06:55.710   432   432 I perfetto:    ftrace_procfs.cc:442 enabled ftrace in /sys/kernel/tracing/
09-03 12:06:55.751  1479  6378 I MediaProvider: Invalidating LocalCallingIdentity cache for package com.example.baselineprofile. Reason: owned_database_row_deleted:/storage/emulated/0/Android/media/com.example.baselineprofile/temporaryScript4626443941097950496.tmp
09-03 12:06:55.753  1479  6378 I MediaProvider: Deleted 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 items on external_primary due to com.android.shell
09-03 12:06:55.754 10498 10516 I PerfettoCapture: Perfetto output - 11211
09-03 12:06:55.754 10498 10516 I PerfettoCapture: EXITCODE=0

Emulator info:

Pixel 6 AVD
Android 14
Android security update: September 5, 2023
Google Play system update: July 1, 2023
Kernel version:
6.1.23-android14-4-00257-g7e35917775b8-ab9964412
#1 Mon Apr 17 20:50:58 UTC 2023
Build number: UE1A.230829.036.A1 dev-keys

It seems like PerfettoCapture doesn't try to kill a perfetto process, and it seems to be able to start a perfetto trace.

Querying for an existing perfetto process on the emulator shows that no perfetto processes are running.

Hypothesis based on information in this thread:

On Pixel (maybe others too) devices with Android 15, the Statsd module is starting a perfetto process. This process can't be killed by PerfettoCapture when running a test, which produces the crash.

Edit 1: Seems like I hit a shortcut that sends the comment and deleted the text 🙈. Now I have to type it all again 😫. Hope I don't hit it again. Well, here we go 🤞.

Edit 2: Comment text got removed when posting the comment — and of course I didn't save it somewhere else. On to try number 3 🏇. Different browser...

al...@intive.com <al...@intive.com> #14Sep 4, 2024 03:41PM

Checked on a Pixel 6 Pro with Android 14 today. The crash did not occur.

I tried restarting the problematic device running 15, it did not resolve the issue. After a restart, the perfetto processes owned by statsd are also present again.

I also encountered this issue with the problematic Pixel 6 Pro running Android 15: https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/239897826. It also couldn't be resolved with a restart. On the Pixel 6 Pro with Android 14, recording a trace was possible.
Maybe the problem described in that issue could also be triggered by the perfetto process which can't be killed. The logs posted in this issue hint that the cause might also be a failure to run perfetto on the device.

mn...@google.com <mn...@google.com> #15Jan 14, 2025 02:30AM

I was able to occasionally reproduce this with my Pixel 5 with ToT on ScrollerBenchmark as well as TrivialKotlinBenchmark. Unfortunately I can't seem to reproduce this anymore, but here are some details anyway:

Device:

Google Pixel 5
Android 14

ke...@netflix.com <ke...@netflix.com> #16Jan 16, 2025 02:33PM

Nice work debugging in #13.
I can confirm I have the same issue on a Pixel 6 running Android 15. Same steps...same error. perfetto process can't be killed.
This seems like a bug in macrobenchmark? Or the Pixel 6 perfetto statsd autostartup.

Given this is a pretty popular test device, it should be easily reproducible...

sh...@gmail.com <sh...@gmail.com> #17Jan 23, 2025 09:17PM

Experiencing the same issue.

Stacktrace:

----- begin exception -----
01-23 21:15:05.513 938 964 E TestRunner: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Failed to stop [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=5165)]
Device:
Pixel 9 Pro XL | Android 15

ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #18Jan 24, 2025 07:16PM

Marked as fixed.

Project: platform/frameworks/support
Branch: androidx-main
Author: Chris Craik <ccraik@google.com>
Link: https://android-review.googlesource.com/3463345

Avoid crashes from external perfetto trace capture

Expand for full commit details

Avoid crashes from external perfetto trace capture 
 
Fixes: 323601788 
Test: ShellTest#killProcessesAndWait_failure 
Relnote: "Speculative fix for crashes: 'Failed to stop [ProcessPid(processName=perfetto, pid=...)]'. Now Benchmark will log a message instead of crashing when a backgroudn Perfetto process isn't able to be stopped before running the benchmark." 
 
From bugreport details, it appears that background perfetto traces are 
often triggered which cannot be terminated by shell. Log an error 
rather than crashing the benchmark. 
 
Change-Id: I37d3e254f7f3e49c53387dae89bb5bed7d2c9bf5

Files:

M benchmark/benchmark-common/src/androidTest/java/androidx/benchmark/PerfettoHelperTest.kt
M benchmark/benchmark-common/src/androidTest/java/androidx/benchmark/ShellTest.kt
M benchmark/benchmark-common/src/main/java/androidx/benchmark/Shell.kt
M benchmark/benchmark-common/src/main/java/androidx/benchmark/perfetto/PerfettoHelper.kt
M benchmark/benchmark-macro/src/androidTest/java/androidx/benchmark/macro/perfetto/AndroidxTracingTraceTest.kt
M benchmark/benchmark-macro/src/androidTest/java/androidx/benchmark/macro/perfetto/PerfettoCaptureSweepTest.kt

Hash: a1d00d7f334608a7d4975b209b4569cfdadb2539
Date: Thu Jan 23 16:10:27 2025

pr...@google.com <pr...@google.com> #19Feb 12, 2025 06:40PM

The following release(s) address this bug.It is possible this bug has only been partially addressed:

androidx.benchmark:benchmark-common:1.4.0-alpha08
androidx.benchmark:benchmark-macro:1.4.0-alpha08