Status Update
Comments
da...@google.com <da...@google.com> #2
For Kotlin 2.0 and KSP 2.0 the Cannot change attributes of configuration ':composeApp:debugFrameworkIosX64' after it has been locked for mutation
really seems like a KSP issue. You should file a bug in their repository with a sample app if possible.
If you downgrade to Kotlin 1.9 then things 'should' work, there are example apps out there with such configuration, like the following one:
el...@google.com <el...@google.com>
da...@google.com <da...@google.com>
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #3
Will try to use the example provided by you to check if it fixes the issue.
da...@google.com <da...@google.com>
pr...@google.com <pr...@google.com> #4
Note that this issue happens when applying the Compose, KSP and Room Plugin together in Kotlin 2.0.x, the workaround for now is to not use the Room Gradle Plugin and instead specify the schema location vis KSP arguments:
// In the build.gradle
ksp {
arg("room.schemaLocation", "${projectDir}/schemas")
}
jo...@gmail.com <jo...@gmail.com> #5
Hi, I encountered a similar problem and was able to resolve it by updating the dependencies
room = "2.7.0-alpha08"
ksp = "2.0.20-1.0.25"
compose-plugin = "1.6.11"
kotlin = "2.0.20"
da...@google.com <da...@google.com> #6
Thats right, an explicit close()
call will make it so that Room won't re-open itself, and if it is attempted to do so to some other call it will cause a crash.
Description
Component useds: androidx.room:room-ktx, androidx.room:room-testing Version used: 2.6.1 Devices/Android versions reproduced on: Robolectric
The definition of
Room.inTransaction()
is:This opens the db even if it wasn't previously open and doesn't close it. This is almost always going to be fine in production, but in tests it can cause a db leak, which is especially painful since it's called by room-internal code.
Since it's
open
, in my project I simply overrode it to bewhich resolved the issue and is similar to a check that most, but not all, room-internal code does anyway.
Would be great to have this catch in the framework though, to prevent this issue for others