Status Update
Comments
ml...@google.com <ml...@google.com> #2
Thank you for reporting this issue. For us to further investigate this issue, please provide the following additional information:
Android build
Which Android build are you using? (e.g. OPP1.170223.012)
Device used - Device Make, Model, Android OS Version
Please provide sample project or apk to reproduce the issue. Also mention the steps to be followed for reproducing the issue with the given sample project or apk.
Android bug report capturing
After reproducing the issue, press the volume up, volume down, and power button simultaneously. This will capture a bug report on your device in the “bug reports” directory.
Alternate method
Navigate to “Developer options”, ensure “USB debugging” is enabled, then enable “Bug report shortcut”. Capture bug report by holding the power button and selecting the “Take bug report” option.
Screen record of the issue, for clarity
Please capture screen record or video of the issue using following steps:
adb shell screenrecord /sdcard/video.mp4
Subsequently use following command to pull the recorded file:
adb pull /sdcard/video.mp4
Note: Please upload the files to google drive and share the folder to
cc...@google.com <cc...@google.com> #3
Devices: samsung, realme, xiaomi, OPPO, motorola, LGE,
I don't know how to write code reproducing issues in Android framework, unless you explain what does "no event down from INITIALIZED" mean. Then maybe I can prepare a piece of code that doesn't "event down from INITIALIZED". Until then - sorry.
Also - this error doesn't ever show on the device it is just logged to crashlytics, so there's now way to capture anything "after reproducing the issue".
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #4
That particular error means that you are attempting to move the Lifecycle
to DESTROYED
before it was actually ever moved to CREATED
. It was never actually supposed to be supported, but there was a bug in Lifecycle that made it so it only failed if there was an Observer
on the Lifecycle
, but it was fixed in
ca...@google.com <ca...@google.com> #5
pr...@google.com <pr...@google.com> #6
I mean it was fixed to throw the error in Lifecycle 2.5
. It was always supposed to be an error.
Description
Component used: Macrobench 1.3.0-alpha05
By default
binder transaction
calls are very enigmatic not providing info on what's going on. This can be improved by enablingAIDL
atrace tag that would give some information in thebinder reply
What do you think we add this tag as default in the macrobenchmark perfetto config?
Reference trace file: