Assigned
Status Update
Comments
ka...@google.com <ka...@google.com>
on...@google.com <on...@google.com> #2
I have forwarded this request to the engineering team. We will update this issue with any progress updates and a resolution.
Best Regards,
Josh Moyer
Google Cloud Platform Support
Best Regards,
Josh Moyer
Google Cloud Platform Support
t....@metro.digital <t....@metro.digital> #3
This is not only useful for IP addresses, but also for many other resources. I understand that names are currently used as identifiers, so this request is probably not trivial to implement. Maybe distinguishing between a (numeric, automatically generated) identifier and a (textual) label is the way to go?
ma...@google.com <ma...@google.com> #4
Is it any hope? We have migrated our IP address to the server with different role, and now the name of this IP address resource doesn't match its role at all. It seems to be trivial enough to momentary reserve static IP address of the old named resource, drop resource, and immediately recreate it with the new name and the old IP address.
Description
Please provide as much information as possible. At least, this should include a description of your issue and steps to reproduce the problem. If possible please provide a summary of what steps or workarounds you have already tried, and any docs or articles you found (un)helpful.
Problem you have encountered:
Cx is observing "cloud-support@google.com" acting as principal making changes to group membership.
These logs are appearing due to the creation of a new Workspace user that had existing memberships as a non-google Workspace user.
As documented [here](
There is a background process that is adding the newly created matching user to the group and removing the placeholder or unclaimed "other" user from the group. This behaviour is documented [here](
When the background process is making the changes, the log entry to this change is reflected under principal cloud-support@google.com
This is causing confusion to Cx.
What you expected to happen:
If it is background process then there should not be any log entry which is not providing any meaningful information to cx
Otherwise, Cx is thinking that Google cloud support is making changes to their user membership
Steps to reproduce:
Other information (workarounds you have tried, documentation consulted, etc):