Fixed
Status Update
Comments
jb...@google.com <jb...@google.com>
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #2
A couple of questions:
1. Have you saw crash in real device or only in simulators?
2. Do you use dynamic feature for language ID?
1. Have you saw crash in real device or only in simulators?
2. Do you use dynamic feature for language ID?
jb...@google.com <jb...@google.com> #3
Tested on Android 12 Emulator with custom executor, but cannot repro this issue.
pr...@google.com <pr...@google.com> #4
-
Second crash in the description is from a real device. Experienced it myself on two different Xiaomi phones, plus lots of crashes from users in the Google Play console.
-
Dynamic features are not used in the application.
As a wild guess, I have downgraded build tools from 31.0.0 to 30.0.3, compileSdk from 31 to 30, and moved all work with Language ID to the service in a separate process (just to be sure that crash can kill secondary process instead of main). This combination is in beta for 2 days by now and I don't see any SIGSEGV crashes.
Description
Component used: Navigation
Problem:
Given a navigation graph, when I programatically route to destinations, one option to do so is to use the Actions api:
Everyone makes mistakes, and sometimes the
navigate
call is omitted. This can lead to hard to spot bugs.Solution:
There are two possible solutions here. One is to simply apply
@CheckResult
to the action method in the generated code output. This is the simplest, and most straightforward. It is also probably the right move, given that if you create an action via this API, it's a bit weird if you then never use it.We can take this a step further, and add a custom lint rule that checks that the action is actually utilized, the same way in which we check that, for example, we commit fragment transactions.