Assigned
Status Update
Comments
ma...@google.com <ma...@google.com>
ag...@gmail.com <ag...@gmail.com> #2
Thanks for the report. I will route this to the appropriate internal team and update this when I hear back from them.
ti...@gmail.com <ti...@gmail.com> #3
One more detail, Data Layer event calls from the watch to the phone (running Android 13) do work on if the listener is in an Activity or Fragment.
mi...@gmail.com <mi...@gmail.com> #5
Experiencing the same issues, please see my other report for any useful logs:
https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/235673375
da...@gmail.com <da...@gmail.com> #6
+1, can confirm it doesn't work on Android 13:=
2022-07-15 11:26:15.023 589-5347 PackageManager pid-589 W Intent does not match component's intent filter: Intent { act=com.google.android.gms.wearable.BIND_LISTENER cmp=xxx/xxx.WatchMessageReceiver }
2022-07-15 11:26:15.023 589-5347 PackageManager pid-589 W Access blocked: ComponentInfo{xxx/xxx.WatchMessageReceiver}
2022-07-15 11:26:15.023 589-5347 ActivityManager pid-589 W Unable to start service Intent { act=com.google.android.gms.wearable.BIND_LISTENER cmp=xxx/xxx.WatchMessageReceiver } U=0: not found
ke...@workiva.com <ke...@workiva.com> #10
As an interim update on this issue: we've been already working on the fix that should be available by Android 13 release. The fix requires thorough testing, I'll keep this bug updated as soon as we have more to share. Thanks!
do...@gmail.com <do...@gmail.com> #11
@
Thank you for the update @
kl...@google.com <kl...@google.com> #13
I have no words for this. Android 13 is labeled "stable" but the Wearable API just doesn't work. Can't this issue be given higher priority? If you want to push WearOS you need to make sure it works normally.
Description
and manage indexes programmatically without the need for me to manage an
index.yaml file outside the application and upload a new version of the
application each time I need to change the application.
I am in the situation where I can dynamically define properties, either
expando or as a datastore.Entity but I cannot allow a user to perform a
query that would include a range query on a property or alter the sort
order against these properties in a user defined query.
From an application point of view, I can handle the fact that an index
might take to generate and may not be available for some time.