Feature Request P2
Status Update
Comments
pr...@google.com <pr...@google.com>
pr...@gmail.com <pr...@gmail.com> #2
Thanks for the report. I will route this to the appropriate internal team and update this when I hear back from them.
ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #3
One more detail, Data Layer event calls from the watch to the phone (running Android 13) do work on if the listener is in an Activity or Fragment.
mu...@gmail.com <mu...@gmail.com> #4
Also, I'm seeing this message in the Logcat:
"2022-06-12 18:47:15.156 1841-4562/? W/PackageManager: Intent does not match component's intent filter: Intent { act=com.google.android.gms.wearable.BIND_LISTENER"
"2022-06-12 18:47:15.156 1841-4562/? W/PackageManager: Intent does not match component's intent filter: Intent { act=com.google.android.gms.wearable.BIND_LISTENER"
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #5
Experiencing the same issues, please see my other report for any useful logs:
https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/235673375
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #6
+1, can confirm it doesn't work on Android 13:=
2022-07-15 11:26:15.023 589-5347 PackageManager pid-589 W Intent does not match component's intent filter: Intent { act=com.google.android.gms.wearable.BIND_LISTENER cmp=xxx/xxx.WatchMessageReceiver }
2022-07-15 11:26:15.023 589-5347 PackageManager pid-589 W Access blocked: ComponentInfo{xxx/xxx.WatchMessageReceiver}
2022-07-15 11:26:15.023 589-5347 ActivityManager pid-589 W Unable to start service Intent { act=com.google.android.gms.wearable.BIND_LISTENER cmp=xxx/xxx.WatchMessageReceiver } U=0: not found
al...@gmail.com <al...@gmail.com> #7
Note that I've been able to make it work by:
- Adding
<action android:name="com.google.android.gms.wearable.BIND_LISTENER" />
in the intent filter - Removing
<data android:scheme="wear" android:host="*" />
But I feel like this is not something we should do
da...@aeromac.com <da...@aeromac.com> #8
I'm really afraid Android 13 might get released as-is, breaking WearOS app communication 😨😨
Description
And how are you?
Any talk of having Reserved Instance Hours for Backends anytime soon?
Backends CPU is our greatest cost right now, so if we could get $0.05/
hour instead of $0.08, then we have a 37.5% savings, which would be
huge.
Super stingy,
-Hardwick
Takashi Matsuo <tmatsuo@google.com> Apr 21 09:51AM +0900
Hi David,
I think this is a very reasonable feature request.
BTW, do you mind filing a issue on the public issue tracker, and call
for starring it? This is one of the best way to show how many people
needs a specific feature.
Thanks,
--
Takashi Matsuo | Developer Advocate | tmatsuo@google.com | 03-6384-9224