Bug P2
Status Update
No update yet.
Comments
ta...@gmail.com
I have forwarded this request to the engineering team. We will update this issue with any progress updates and a resolution.
Best Regards,
Josh Moyer
Google Cloud Platform Support
Best Regards,
Josh Moyer
Google Cloud Platform Support
pa...@google.com
This is not only useful for IP addresses, but also for many other resources. I understand that names are currently used as identifiers, so this request is probably not trivial to implement. Maybe distinguishing between a (numeric, automatically generated) identifier and a (textual) label is the way to go?
jt...@gmail.com
Is it any hope? We have migrated our IP address to the server with different role, and now the name of this IP address resource doesn't match its role at all. It seems to be trivial enough to momentary reserve static IP address of the old named resource, drop resource, and immediately recreate it with the new name and the old IP address.
ka...@gmail.com
This would also improve life when using the Google Deployment Manager (since it otherwise error's out if you've changed a name of an IP)
fr...@gmail.com
Over 3 years to get something as basic as renaming a static IP address. Any progress here?
de...@derekperkins.com
Yes, I have a customer who has this exact issue too! Any updates or workarounds would be very appreciated!
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
Any progress in here?
zi...@gmail.com
I would like this feature as well.
qu...@gmail.com
Hello, any progress in here? Please is very frustrating.
fr...@gmail.com
Hi, open request for more than 3 years for a simple change. Please proceed that.
sk...@gmail.com
+1. :(
de...@derekperkins.com
We need this.
jt...@gmail.com
please add this!
de...@derekperkins.com
+1 !
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
+1
ti...@terran.io
+1
al...@gmail.com
We need this please
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
+1
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
+1
2018 =(
2018 =(
dr...@mypacificacademy.net
+1
al...@gmail.com
+1
is...@google.com
wb...@gmail.com
+1
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
+1
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
+1 (again) coming up to 5 years?
ka...@gmail.com
+1
de...@giantthinkwell.com
+1
tr...@gmail.com
+1
na...@gmail.com
+1
da...@illumon.com
+1
sy...@gmail.com
+1
ho...@gmail.com
+1
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
Please implement this
hi...@smiledu.com
+1
de...@gmail.com
+1, don't see why this would be hard. If the underlying GCP infrastructure depends on the name remaining unchanged, then the frontend can simply provide a way to alias it such that the end-user doesn't have to see the "original" name anymore.
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
Bumping this.
Definitely useful feature at least provide a way to alias this.
+1
Definitely useful feature at least provide a way to alias this.
+1
me...@gmail.com
+1
ja...@terratrue.com
+1
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
+1
sy...@gmail.com
+1 Please add this feature
shouldn't be a very difficult implementation but benefits lots of people
shouldn't be a very difficult implementation but benefits lots of people
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
+1
ec...@gmail.com
+1
ra...@gmail.com
+1
da...@google.com
+1
da...@google.com
+1 (same goes for description). Should update in-place
ro...@redfin.com
+1 here too. But the problem is also with disks. We currently use part of hostname in the name. Sometimes a machine has to be renamed and it's not possible.
ad...@gmail.com
+1
ta...@gmail.com
+1
hi...@gmail.com
Guys, this feature was requested in 2014, what's the problem? Why hasn't this been implemented or at least an update been given??
mi...@datanova.com.au
+1
Whe the ETA for this simple important request?
Whe the ETA for this simple important request?
ro...@google.com
ce...@google.com
At least say NO so we are not left hanging for years and years. If you are looking for a reason why Google you can't compete with Azure and AWS this thread would be a prime example. If Google can't respond to basic feature requests then it is easy to imagine they can't do other basic things. Did Elon Musk take over Google too? Are 1/2 of you Google employees fired or just too busy checking out Amazon prime deals working at home? WTF, crickets for 8+ years? Do Something!
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
+1
fr...@google.com
+1
da...@zieglerlabs.com
Hello,
Thanks for reaching out to us!
The Feature Request has been created and the Product Engineering Team is working on this request. At this moment, there is no ETA to this request. Thank you for your trust and continued support to improve Google Cloud Platform products.
In case you want to report a new issue, please do not hesitate to create a new
ga...@gmail.com
+1, this would be a very valuable feature.
ji...@google.com
Hello,
Thank you for pointing out the redirect URIs, this issue is meant to capture such important features in OAuth configurations. However there is still no ETA for this. Please make sure you hit +1 and star this issue as to provide visibility on the importance of this request on to the product team.
ma...@ada.com
+1
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
+1
ra...@codeclouds.in
+1
lo...@gmail.com
+1
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
+1
da...@gmail.com
One potential workaround is building a Tampermoney script to automate the updates in-browser. It's not as clean as an API call but it can do batch work and eliminate the potential for human error.
fr...@google.com
Engineering team is still working on this. There is still no timeline or implementation guarantee for feature requests.Please make sure you hit +1 and star this issue as to provide visibility on the importance of this request on to the product team.
jr...@gmail.com
Just came by to wish this bug a very happy 7th birthday!
You've grown so much over the past 7 years and I'm very proud of your persistence. The future is very bright for you. 😎
Enjoy your special day little guy! 🥳 🍻
You've grown so much over the past 7 years and I'm very proud of your persistence. The future is very bright for you. 😎
Enjoy your special day little guy! 🥳 🍻
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
+1
fc...@gmail.com
+1
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
+1
th...@gmail.com
+1
si...@gmail.com
Hey team!
"Authorized JavaScript origins" is heavily used in Firebase Login to authorize your custom authDomain in firebase config file.
And "Authorized redirect URIs" for facebook login redirect too.
Maybe this issue could at least be implemented through Firebase Auth?
Being able to authorize a sub-domain to work for a custom firebase authDomain on-the-fly would be so neat!
Native implementation of course would be even better!
PS: This feature is CRITICAL for login in a SaaS product team pls pls pls!
Keep up the work guys <3
"Authorized JavaScript origins" is heavily used in Firebase Login to authorize your custom authDomain in firebase config file.
And "Authorized redirect URIs" for facebook login redirect too.
Maybe this issue could at least be implemented through Firebase Auth?
Being able to authorize a sub-domain to work for a custom firebase authDomain on-the-fly would be so neat!
Native implementation of course would be even better!
PS: This feature is CRITICAL for login in a SaaS product team pls pls pls!
Keep up the work guys <3
jo...@front.com
+1
vi...@gmail.com
Incredible, problem since 2015 when a simple application of a generic subdomain like https://*.domain.tld would be so easy... then just checking the origin url and the identical destination...
Otherwise be able to add new URIs via the API, in order to add the client URIs before making the token request by the client in the subdomain...
+1
Otherwise be able to add new URIs via the API, in order to add the client URIs before making the token request by the client in the subdomain...
+1
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
+1 - need to update authorized javascript origins in a automatic way from a script. why is this broken for so long?
am...@khare.co.in
+1
or...@gmail.com
+2
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
any update from the engineering team about the status of this? this breaks automated CI env setup for us, which is really painful to manage the dynamic domains by hand.
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
+1 please
ja...@gmail.com
+1
pa...@gmail.com
+1
gi...@gmail.com
+1
ch...@vortexa.com
+1
d....@space307.com
+1
ar...@gmail.com
+1
le...@kyosk.app
+1
pa...@gmail.com
+1
de...@gmail.com
+1
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
+1
ma...@gmail.com
+1
no...@guitup.com
+1
jo...@smartrr.com
+1
ap...@jellyfishtechnologies.com
for(int i=0; i<10000000; i++){
print('+1');
}
print('+1');
}
ge...@gmail.com
+1
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
+1
tn...@hex.tech
+1
ja...@gmail.com
+1 - what is the recommended workaround for this? E.g. should I use an iframe on subdomains, containing a mini auth page on the top-level domain?
ma...@sonicjobs.com
+1
ma...@huntandhackett.com
I feel so dirty, I lack the amount of soap to cleanse myself of this.
I long for the beauty and love that I got familiar with using GCP.
I'm at a crossroads, doing something manually in our CI/CD - or leave GCP to betroth myself to Azure.
There is no choice left, as manual labor is slavery.
Azure it is.
I long for the beauty and love that I got familiar with using GCP.
I'm at a crossroads, doing something manually in our CI/CD - or leave GCP to betroth myself to Azure.
There is no choice left, as manual labor is slavery.
Azure it is.
am...@gmail.com
+1
an...@gmail.com
Even I am impacted by this!!
ai...@gmail.com
+1
sa...@gmail.com
+1
su...@vectoscalar.com
+1
bo...@plana.solutions
+1
hs...@nsquared.io
+1
al...@flexrentalsolutions.com
+1
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
+1
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
+1
ol...@gmail.com
+1
Makes using dynamic domains for each branch like in Vercel very difficult to use.
Makes using dynamic domains for each branch like in Vercel very difficult to use.
ye...@gmail.com
+1
ja...@unthread.io
+1
an...@ownerfactory.com
An issue since 2015...wow
va...@google.com
gh...@google.com
on...@kontentino.com
+1
al...@eadem.com
+1000
hu...@gmail.com
+1
vh...@gmail.com
+1
la...@gmail.com
+1
ch...@gmail.com
Comment has been deleted.
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
+google
ne...@gmail.com
any updates?
li...@gmail.com
any updates. i'm shocked (not) that this has been open since 2015 and google has not even bothered to implement something that seems trivial. This is a common feature on MANY other platforms.
ma...@begrateful.org
+1
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
+1
ra...@gmail.com
Will this ever get resolved?
ho...@eano.com
+1, please fix this!!!!
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
+1
ho...@gmail.com
+1
vp...@ext.uber.com
+1
sn...@ext.uber.com
+1
br...@gmail.com
+1
ma...@magnetcustomer.com
+1
ad...@firstpromoter.com
+1
de...@policyme.com
+1
Please add this feature to gcloud api
Please add this feature to gcloud api
sh...@qburst.com
+1
th...@ae.studio
+1
ha...@gmail.com
+1
ka...@gmail.com
+1 It's open since 2015.
si...@gmail.com
+1
wa...@hotmail.fr
+1
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
+1
1v...@gmail.com
+1
dr...@gmail.com
+1
di...@gmail.com
+1
di...@gmail.com
+1
fi...@uppedevents.com
+1
mk...@qualtrics.com
+1
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
+1 from me
pa...@gmail.com
Nearly 10 years in the making and this single bug I'm sure is a blocker to any major multisite application ever being hosted on Google Cloud. What a shame.
ad...@pulselive.tv
Colour television was invented since this bug was logged; the Berlin wall fell. Hopefully now with Gemini Flash to help we'll finally be able to use multisite OAuth without jumping through hoops.
br...@proofpilot.com
It'd sure be neat if y'all did something to address this within the next decade.
va...@google.com
rw...@foxhire.com
+1
al...@gmail.com
i LOATHE google.
va...@google.com
j....@pons.de
+1
This bug is as old as a Microsoft Lumia 950 mobile phone, or James Bond "Spectre".
This bug is as old as a Microsoft Lumia 950 mobile phone, or James Bond "Spectre".
ak...@gmail.com
Comment has been deleted.
an...@du.co
+1
> Status: New
Excuse me?
> Status: New
Excuse me?
ad...@wisk.aero
+1
This ticket has been around longer than I've been an engineer. Will it still be around after I retire?
This ticket has been around longer than I've been an engineer. Will it still be around after I retire?
pr...@gmail.com
+1
an...@intellum.com
+1
ma...@gratefulgiving.org
The person you emailed uses Gated2 to manage emails from vendors and
unknown contacts.
Click here to create a vendor profile.
<https://gated2.uc.r.appspot.com/create?e=buganizer-system@google.com >
Or click here
<https://gated2.uc.r.appspot.com/bypass?s=buganizer-system@google.com&r=matt.ostanik@gratefulgiving.org >
if you know them personally, or if your email is not a solicitation.
This is an automated message.
unknown contacts.
Click here to create a vendor profile.
<
Or click here
<
if you know them personally, or if your email is not a solicitation.
This is an automated message.
ad...@vedubox.com
A complaint ticket opened in 2015, and it's the 9th anniversary of it – can you believe that? What we want is to add redirect URI and JavaScript origin via an API or SDK method, that's all. I wonder if anyone will care about this!
Description
Since subdomain wildcards aren't allowed, there really should be an API to update domains. That way I can automatically add their subdomain as a verified javascript origin / redirect uri. Without that, I can't have self-service customers because they won't be able to login until we manually add it.
This now seems to be the preferred way to provide customer access to SaaS accounts, but is near impossible with the current setup.
Thanks,
Derek