Status Update
Comments
fa...@google.com <fa...@google.com> #2
Best Regards,
Josh Moyer
Google Cloud Platform Support
fa...@google.com <fa...@google.com> #3
jo...@gmail.com <jo...@gmail.com> #4
fa...@google.com <fa...@google.com>
ke...@geotab.com <ke...@geotab.com> #5
jo...@gmail.com <jo...@gmail.com> #6
ra...@gmail.com <ra...@gmail.com> #7
da...@gmail.com <da...@gmail.com> #8
jo...@gmail.com <jo...@gmail.com> #9
sw...@bainbridgehealth.com <sw...@bainbridgehealth.com> #10
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #11
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #12
th...@gmail.com <th...@gmail.com> #13
ke...@gmail.com <ke...@gmail.com> #14
cb...@google.com <cb...@google.com> #15
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #16
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #17
ei...@healthy.io <ei...@healthy.io> #18
jo...@gmail.com <jo...@gmail.com> #19
go...@google.com <go...@google.com> #20
2018 =(
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #21
go...@google.com <go...@google.com> #22
go...@google.com <go...@google.com> #23
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #24
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #25
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #26
ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #27
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #28
lu...@gmail.com <lu...@gmail.com> #29
jo...@gmail.com <jo...@gmail.com> #30
ma...@google.com <ma...@google.com> #31
go...@google.com <go...@google.com> #32
ke...@gmail.com <ke...@gmail.com> #33
go...@google.com <go...@google.com> #34
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #35
go...@google.com <go...@google.com> #36
Definitely useful feature at least provide a way to alias this.
+1
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #37
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #38
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #39
ke...@gmail.com <ke...@gmail.com> #40
shouldn't be a very difficult implementation but benefits lots of people
go...@google.com <go...@google.com> #41
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #42
go...@google.com <go...@google.com> #43
go...@google.com <go...@google.com> #44
ke...@gmail.com <ke...@gmail.com> #45
go...@google.com <go...@google.com> #46
+1 here too. But the problem is also with disks. We currently use part of hostname in the name. Sometimes a machine has to be renamed and it's not possible.
ch...@google.com <ch...@google.com> #47
go...@google.com <go...@google.com> #48
+1
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #49
ke...@gmail.com <ke...@gmail.com> #50
Whe the ETA for this simple important request?
jo...@google.com <jo...@google.com> #51
cu...@google.com <cu...@google.com> #52
ha...@google.com <ha...@google.com> #53
cy...@gmail.com <cy...@gmail.com> #54
ry...@gmail.com <ry...@gmail.com> #55
ry...@gmail.com <ry...@gmail.com> #56
vo...@google.com <vo...@google.com>
vo...@google.com <vo...@google.com> #57
Hello,
This has been forwarded to the Engineering Team so that they may evaluate it. Note that there are no ETAs or guarantees of implementation for this. All communication regarding this has to be done here.
re...@ebury.com <re...@ebury.com> #58
al...@google.com <al...@google.com> #59
Just adding that I received this exact request from a customer for implementing a solution in GCP. It's a requirement for their project.
To be clear, the request is to time out after 15 minutes. Right now, in security settings in the Admin console, you can only set this to 1 hour. We also need the console to reset to a login screen after idle for the amount of time in the security settings for re-authentication.
Is there an update to when this might be implemented? Is a 15 minute timeout still being implemented?
ya...@google.com <ya...@google.com> #60
Hi there,
I've covered US Federal Dep't of Interior, Social Security Administration, Department of Agriculture, FAA, and Department of Travel and every time we've talked about identity and access management this subject has come up.
In Federal markets, there is a standard (and in some cases a requirement) to have a 15 minute session timeout as a maximum. Federal customers typically accredit to NIST 800-53 information security standards and each agency that I've worked with has asked for a 15 minute timeout, and, in some cases (like SSA), have asked for even more aggressive session timeouts.
da...@commercebuild.com <da...@commercebuild.com> #61
Regarding #43
Re
: The very first authorization has to be in the browser, as will any subsequent explcit invocations of gcloud auth login. The 'session control' policy is only for reauthentication of an already authorized session. comment#42
how do we 'reauthenticate an already authorized session'?
I am having to go through the full authentication flow twice every day, once for any browser tabs on console.cloud.google.com and then again for the gcloud session. The only way i can get gcloud working again is do a gcloud auth login --update-adc
da...@commercebuild.com <da...@commercebuild.com> #62
How to we get around this? We have GCP Session Control Re-authentication method set to 'Security Key'. Using console.cloud.google.com it would be nice to be able to use a passkey.
$ gcloud compute instances list
Reauthentication required.
ERROR: (gcloud.compute.instances.list) There was a problem refreshing your current auth tokens: Reauthentication failed. Reauthentication challenge failed due to API error: NO_AVAILABLE_CHALLENGES
Description
The cloud management console -
We develop services and products for the healthcare industry. As such, we are obliged to meet cyber security policies and regulations (such as HIPAA). A very basic control is having session timeouts on such portals (especially a management console allowing full control of the cloud environment).
I understand most users will find it cumbersome. Having said that, allowing us users to choose and activate such a timeout will help us meet compliance on a higher level. I'm certain other industries (finance, banking, security, government) would appreciate such capabilities as well.
Thanks for your support!
-Eitan