Internal server error. Error processing features. [374592176]

Assigned

Bug

Status Update

No update yet.

Description

ni...@copyrightagent.com

created issue #1

Oct 21, 2024 06:58AM

Since October 9. we have, at random, received the error "Internal server error. Error processing features." from the API.

We haven't spent time trying to reproduce the error consistently as it's very few images that triggers the error.

Comments

pu...@google.com <pu...@google.com> Oct 22, 2024 06:37AM

Assigned to je...@google.com.

je...@google.com <je...@google.com> #2Oct 24, 2024 03:08PM

Hello,

Thank you for reaching out.

This issue was forwarded to our product team. Please keep in mind that this issue has to be analyzed and considered by the product team and I can't provide you ETA for it to be delivered. However, you can keep track of the status by following this thread.

Kind Regards

ni...@copyrightagent.com <ni...@copyrightagent.com> #3Oct 25, 2024 06:55AM

Is there any update on this issue?

ni...@copyrightagent.com <ni...@copyrightagent.com> #4Oct 26, 2024 06:05AM

Hello,

Thank you for your patience.

Our product team is currently working on it. Once there will be an update it will be shared in this thread.

Kind Regards

je...@google.com <je...@google.com> #5Oct 28, 2024 05:43AM

Are there any alternative solutions or workarounds that would allow us to access the pipeline run id? This functionality is useful for us to be able to correlate our predictions with the pipeline runs that created them. And that in turn can help analysis/troubleshooting.

ni...@copyrightagent.com <ni...@copyrightagent.com> #6Oct 28, 2024 07:40AM

Hello,

Thank you for reaching out. Our internal team is handling the case. Unfortunately there are no updates about it. For now, please stay tune to this thread for updates.

Regards,

je...@google.com <je...@google.com> #7Oct 30, 2024 04:22AM

Reassigned to gc...@google.com.

Hello,

Quick update about this. Our team mentions that for Vertex Pipelines, we have a different set of placeholders, the currently implemented ones are names and uuids. Here's an example of using them: https://github.com/kubeflow/pipelines/blob/master/sdk/python/kfp/v2/compiler_cli_tests/test_data/pipeline_with_placeholders.py

Let me know if this helps you with your case.

Regards,

Issue 374592176

Description

Issue summary

Comments

pu...@google.com <pu...@google.com> Oct 22, 2024 06:37AM

je...@google.com <je...@google.com> #2Oct 24, 2024 03:08PM

ni...@copyrightagent.com <ni...@copyrightagent.com> #3Oct 25, 2024 06:55AM

ni...@copyrightagent.com <ni...@copyrightagent.com> #4Oct 26, 2024 06:05AM

je...@google.com <je...@google.com> #5Oct 28, 2024 05:43AM

ni...@copyrightagent.com <ni...@copyrightagent.com> #6Oct 28, 2024 07:40AM

je...@google.com <je...@google.com> #7Oct 30, 2024 04:22AM

Add comment

Issue metadata