Fixed
Status Update
Comments
so...@google.com <so...@google.com>
so...@google.com <so...@google.com> #3
Disabling an application means that it still counts against your three-application limit.
Deleting one would mean that it wouldn't anymore.
Deleting one would mean that it wouldn't anymore.
fa...@gmail.com <fa...@gmail.com> #4
[Comment deleted]
el...@gmail.com <el...@gmail.com> #5
@srfarley - I'd recommend you use the "New Issue" link instead of scope-creeping an
existing issue and expecting that to work out.
existing issue and expecting that to work out.
el...@gmail.com <el...@gmail.com> #6
Deleting an entire app would also be a good way to delete a borked datastore, which
seems to be a common issue.
seems to be a common issue.
fa...@gmail.com <fa...@gmail.com> #7
This is a feature request - the ability to delete an application. But several things
should be noted:
1. There is now 10 apps given per developer
2. You can re-use an App id
3. Deleting an existing datastore is a separate issue.
should be noted:
1. There is now 10 apps given per developer
2. You can re-use an App id
3. Deleting an existing datastore is a separate issue.
fa...@gmail.com <fa...@gmail.com> #8
I want to change authentication options but it is not available so i need to delete
the application then recreate it. Hope both features will available soon.
the application then recreate it. Hope both features will available soon.
sa...@gmail.com <sa...@gmail.com> #9
ro...@gmail.com <ro...@gmail.com> #10
Being able to delete apps and rename apps is pretty fundamental. I wouldn't consider it to be low priority.
I'm trying to do some GAE development for clients, but I have almost run out of slots. When I was initially
playing around with the system, I was rather liberal with creating applications, and now with no way to delete
or rename them, I'm stuck with the application names I initially chose (and which I no longer want to use).
In the short run, it would be nice if there was an email address documented somewhere so we could ask for
the apps to be manually deleted or renamed (as is the case when more quota is needed).
I'm trying to do some GAE development for clients, but I have almost run out of slots. When I was initially
playing around with the system, I was rather liberal with creating applications, and now with no way to delete
or rename them, I'm stuck with the application names I initially chose (and which I no longer want to use).
In the short run, it would be nice if there was an email address documented somewhere so we could ask for
the apps to be manually deleted or renamed (as is the case when more quota is needed).
ni...@gmail.com <ni...@gmail.com> #11
As a workaround:
1. Create a new google account.
2. Add the new google account as a developer for the app you want to get rid of.
3. Remove your real account from the app.
I didn't try this yet, but it should work. Please let us know if it doesn't.
1. Create a new google account.
2. Add the new google account as a developer for the app you want to get rid of.
3. Remove your real account from the app.
I didn't try this yet, but it should work. Please let us know if it doesn't.
ni...@gmail.com <ni...@gmail.com> #12
yaakovsash,
I tried your proposed workaround. Unfortunately, when you give your applications
away to the other user, you don't get to create a new one.
I now have 9 apps on my dashboard, but I don't have the option to create another one.
I'm also a bit pissed off about the SMS authorization scheme they've introduced - it
may or may not cost me $5 because my cell phone company (Rogers in Canada) is evil.
It took me about an hour of messing around with their gateway and resending the SMS
to get my code. Not Google's fault really - but why build a dependency in on such a
brain-damaged third-party system?
App Engine is a pretty cool system that I'd like to promote as part of my
professional practice, but it's not clear to me that Google is positioning it as
anything other than a 'hobby' tool.
I tried your proposed workaround. Unfortunately, when you give your applications
away to the other user, you don't get to create a new one.
I now have 9 apps on my dashboard, but I don't have the option to create another one.
I'm also a bit pissed off about the SMS authorization scheme they've introduced - it
may or may not cost me $5 because my cell phone company (Rogers in Canada) is evil.
It took me about an hour of messing around with their gateway and resending the SMS
to get my code. Not Google's fault really - but why build a dependency in on such a
brain-damaged third-party system?
App Engine is a pretty cool system that I'd like to promote as part of my
professional practice, but it's not clear to me that Google is positioning it as
anything other than a 'hobby' tool.
an...@gmail.com <an...@gmail.com> #13
[Comment deleted]
an...@gmail.com <an...@gmail.com> #14
[Comment deleted]
el...@gmail.com <el...@gmail.com> #15
It seems a little silly.
This is one of the oldest issues.
This issue has never been addressed by anyone from google.
There is a published workaround that doesn't work.
The solution seems so ridiculously simple.
I can only assume that google can't delete applications, and that there is a limited
pool of slots for potential applications. Is this the case? *knock* *knock* google,
is anyone listening?
This is one of the oldest issues.
This issue has never been addressed by anyone from google.
There is a published workaround that doesn't work.
The solution seems so ridiculously simple.
I can only assume that google can't delete applications, and that there is a limited
pool of slots for potential applications. Is this the case? *knock* *knock* google,
is anyone listening?
41...@gmail.com <41...@gmail.com> #17
There is an interesting security issue arising when you reuse a domain name that has
been previously controlled by someone else. It's described in the "Domain
Contamination" article by Amit Klein
(http://www.webappsec.org/projects/articles/020606.shtml ). The idea of the attack is
to cause some malicious pages to be cached indefinitely.
been previously controlled by someone else. It's described in the "Domain
Contamination" article by Amit Klein
(
to cause some malicious pages to be cached indefinitely.
ha...@gmail.com <ha...@gmail.com> #18
It's also a deterrent to domain squatting. With only a limited number of apps, it
doesnt make sense to 'take' domains just because you can - in case you might want it.
doesnt make sense to 'take' domains just because you can - in case you might want it.
ha...@gmail.com <ha...@gmail.com> #19
Comment has been deleted.
ha...@gmail.com <ha...@gmail.com> #20
I'm guessing removal is not as trivial as rm -rf but common now, you're Google.
ks...@gmail.com <ks...@gmail.com> #21
Ten slots does seem pretty meager especially when developers are just getting their
feet wet. If they get to the point of wanting to actually deploy apps "for real" this
could be a real issue. I know this is still Beta (it is Google after all), so maybe
this will get resolved eventually. Meanwhile, I'm starring this issue.
feet wet. If they get to the point of wanting to actually deploy apps "for real" this
could be a real issue. I know this is still Beta (it is Google after all), so maybe
this will get resolved eventually. Meanwhile, I'm starring this issue.
ks...@gmail.com <ks...@gmail.com> #22
Please fix this. In particular I want one operation in the dashboard that deletes all
the versions of an application and its data. If I have to pick one of the two,
deleting all the data at once is more important.
the versions of an application and its data. If I have to pick one of the two,
deleting all the data at once is more important.
am...@google.com <am...@google.com> #23
[Comment deleted]
Description
What
User experience
What type of Android issue is this?
Calls / Voice / Mobile Network
What steps would let us observe this issue?
What did you expect to happen?
The phone would not turn off and I continue talking
What actually happened?
The phone turned off.
What was the effect of this issue on your device usage, such as lost time or work?
High
Additional comments
From two longer calls today it happened in both cases
When
Time and frequency
When did this happen?
Nov 14, 2024 9:30 AM GMT+01:00
How often has this happened?
Frequently
Where
Component
Suggested component: <not visible> (1630575)
Build and device data
- Build Number: google/lynx_beta/lynx:15/BP11.241025.006/12620009:user/release-keys
(Note: It is the build when sending this report. For exact build reference, please see the attached bugreport.)
Debugging information
Google Play services
com.google.android.gms
Version 244433035 (24.44.33 (260400-694629214))
System App (Updated)
Android System WebView
com.google.android.webview
Version 672310733 (130.0.6723.107)
System App (Updated)
Network operator: Vodafone CZ
SIM operator: Vodafone CZ
Filed by Android Beta Feedback. Version (Updated): 2.46-betterbug.external_20241023_RC01 (DOGFOOD)https://developer.android.com/preview/feedback#feedback-app .
To learn more about our feedback process, please visit