Assigned
Status Update
Comments
aa...@google.com <aa...@google.com>
yy...@gmail.com <yy...@gmail.com> #2
Disregard - after adding
enableUnitTestCoverage = false
enableAndroidTestCoverage false
Thinks started to work again.
But for what it is worth - the error message could have been more helpful.
enableUnitTestCoverage = false
enableAndroidTestCoverage false
Thinks started to work again.
But for what it is worth - the error message could have been more helpful.
yy...@gmail.com <yy...@gmail.com> #3
Well the error message is that it tried to configure jacoco task and failed, so it works for you because you disabled the feature.
So the error message is indicative of a bigger problem. Oviously, 8.2 is pretty old for us, not sure you are interested in trying 8.8.
The easiest would be to have a project reproducing the issue, if that's possible, we'll look into it.
je...@google.com <je...@google.com> #4
We tried bumping things up to 8.8 but that causes other problems that we need to resolve first. There was a long list of issues with name spaces and what not due to clashes across different 3rd part integrations that we have in the app.
Unfortunately we haven't had the resources to keep things up to date for a long time - and now every possible problem is just piling up...
I'll get back once we manage to upgrade to 8.8...
Unfortunately we haven't had the resources to keep things up to date for a long time - and now every possible problem is just piling up...
I'll get back once we manage to upgrade to 8.8...
yy...@gmail.com <yy...@gmail.com> #5
i tried to parse all dependencies for base and features in configuration, and then set transitive=false with base project on features buildscript. it's work fine and all dependency will transform once for all projects.
Description
I've found that dynamic features make the overall build much slower. Especially if there are a large number of dynamic features. Is it possible to add the final product of the dynamic feature build to the base compilation as a dependency to optimize the build efficiency? If it is a CI compilation, it takes 5-10 times longer than a local build, which is very unacceptable
PS: The cache generated by the build is more than ten times that of the regular one: I now have 60 dynamic features, which will generate 20G+ cache, and this is just a variant case.