In Progress
Status Update
Comments
je...@google.com <je...@google.com>
sp...@google.com <sp...@google.com> #2
Disregard - after adding
enableUnitTestCoverage = false
enableAndroidTestCoverage false
Thinks started to work again.
But for what it is worth - the error message could have been more helpful.
enableUnitTestCoverage = false
enableAndroidTestCoverage false
Thinks started to work again.
But for what it is worth - the error message could have been more helpful.
sp...@google.com <sp...@google.com> #3
Well the error message is that it tried to configure jacoco task and failed, so it works for you because you disabled the feature.
So the error message is indicative of a bigger problem. Oviously, 8.2 is pretty old for us, not sure you are interested in trying 8.8.
The easiest would be to have a project reproducing the issue, if that's possible, we'll look into it.
bu...@google.com <bu...@google.com> #4
We tried bumping things up to 8.8 but that causes other problems that we need to resolve first. There was a long list of issues with name spaces and what not due to clashes across different 3rd part integrations that we have in the app.
Unfortunately we haven't had the resources to keep things up to date for a long time - and now every possible problem is just piling up...
I'll get back once we manage to upgrade to 8.8...
Unfortunately we haven't had the resources to keep things up to date for a long time - and now every possible problem is just piling up...
I'll get back once we manage to upgrade to 8.8...
bu...@google.com <bu...@google.com> #6
Hi. I've received your bug and will wait for https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-74451 to be resolved and then assign the bug to hungnv@google.com.
Description
Right now the kotlin extension (exposed by the built-in support in AGP) contains Kotlin sourcesets.
According to the Kotlin team, these should not be used with AGP. The best solution long term is to refactor the extension and remove them. Until that happens, AGP should stop attempting to synchronize these sourcesets with its own.
I would propose the following