IssueTracker

For Kotlin 2.0 and KSP 2.0 the Cannot change attributes of configuration ':composeApp:debugFrameworkIosX64' after it has been locked for mutation really seems like a KSP issue. You should file a bug in their repository with a sample app if possible.

If you downgrade to Kotlin 1.9 then things 'should' work, there are example apps out there with such configuration, like the following one: https://github.com/realityexpander/KMP_Room/tree/main

Note that this issue happens when applying the Compose, KSP and Room Plugin together in Kotlin 2.0.x, the workaround for now is to not use the Room Gradle Plugin and instead specify the schema location vis KSP arguments:

// In the build.gradle
ksp {
    arg("room.schemaLocation", "${projectDir}/schemas")
}

Hi, I encountered a similar problem and was able to resolve it by updating the dependencies

room = "2.7.0-alpha08"
ksp = "2.0.20-1.0.25"

compose-plugin = "1.6.11"
kotlin = "2.0.20"

Gotcha - I think the issue is obfuscation then.

Can you try disabling it:

compose.desktop {
    application {
        buildTypes.release.proguard.obfuscate = false
        ...
    }
}

Two more alternatives:

1. Include a proguard file with the same rule specified by Room's included one: -keep class * extends androidx.room.RoomDatabase { void <init>(); } via the DSL buildTypes.release.proguard.configurationFiles

2. Include a 'factory' in your database builder that uses the database constructor in a more manual way, avoiding the reflection that is for convinience:

Room.inMemoryDatabaseBuilder<MyDatabase>(
    factory = { MyDatabaseCtor.initialize() }
)

Project: platform/frameworks/support
Branch: androidx-main
Author: Daniel Santiago Rivera <danysantiago@google.com>
Link:      https://android-review.googlesource.com/3467584

Include Proguard rules in Room's runtime JVM artifacts

Include Proguard rules in Room's runtime JVM artifacts 
 
Bug: 392657750 
Test: Manually on sample app with ./gradlew runRelease 
Change-Id: I43950728d7227e13979945a64a118e55270ed4e0

The following release(s) address this bug.It is possible this bug has only been partially addressed:

• androidx.room:room-runtime:2.7.0-beta01
• androidx.room:room-runtime-android:2.7.0-beta01
• androidx.room:room-runtime-iosarm64:2.7.0-beta01
• androidx.room:room-runtime-iossimulatorarm64:2.7.0-beta01
• androidx.room:room-runtime-iosx64:2.7.0-beta01
• androidx.room:room-runtime-jvm:2.7.0-beta01
• androidx.room:room-runtime-linuxarm64:2.7.0-beta01
• androidx.room:room-runtime-linuxx64:2.7.0-beta01
• androidx.room:room-runtime-macosarm64:2.7.0-beta01
• androidx.room:room-runtime-macosx64:2.7.0-beta01

After upgrading 2.7.0-beta01, this crash still exists.

Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Cannot find implementation for com.develop.ximi.db.AppDatabase. AppDatabase_Impl does not exist. Is Room annotation processor correctly configured?

Component used: room-runtime, room-compiler, sqlite-bundled Version used: room: 2.7.0-beta01, sqlite: 2.5.0-beta01

Re-opening since this doesn't seem to be resolved.

I'm not sure what else we need to include in the artifact, the JVM .jar now contains rules to avoid removing the default no-arg constructor:

❯ unzip -l /Users/danysantiago/Downloads/room-runtime-jvm-2.7.0-beta01.jar
Archive:  /Users/danysantiago/Downloads/room-runtime-jvm-2.7.0-beta01.jar
  Length      Date    Time    Name
---------  ---------- -----   ----
        0  02-01-1980 00:00   META-INF/
       25  02-01-1980 00:00   META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
      703  02-01-1980 00:00   META-INF/room-runtime.kotlin_module
                              ...
        0  02-01-1980 00:00   META-INF/com.android.tools/
        0  02-01-1980 00:00   META-INF/com.android.tools/proguard/
       62  02-01-1980 00:00   META-INF/com.android.tools/proguard/room.pro
        0  02-01-1980 00:00   META-INF/com.android.tools/r8/
       62  02-01-1980 00:00   META-INF/com.android.tools/r8/room.pro
        0  02-01-1980 00:00   META-INF/proguard/
       62  02-01-1980 00:00   META-INF/proguard/room.pro
        0  02-01-1980 00:00   META-INF/androidx/
        0  02-01-1980 00:00   META-INF/androidx/room/
        0  02-01-1980 00:00   META-INF/androidx/room/room-runtime/

But it seems that is not enough?

However if I create the same proguard file and include it via the DSL it works:

compose.desktop {
    application {
        mainClass = "org.example.project.MainKt"
        buildTypes.release.proguard {
            configurationFiles.from(project.layout.projectDirectory.file("proguard.pro"))
        }
    }
}

It seems the issue might be with Kotlin Gradle Plugin consuming proguard rules in dependencies?

If turn off the obfuscation, there is no error, but it's certainly not a good solution

compose.desktop {
    application {
        buildTypes.release{
            proguard {
                isEnabled = true  // false to disable proguard
                optimize = true
                obfuscate = true // if set to false, no err. default is false.
                // additional rule
                configurationFiles.from(project.layout.projectDirectory.file("proguard-rules.pro"))
            }
        }
    }
}

After using version 2.7.0-beta01, I also get "AppDatabase_Impl does not exist. Is Room annotation processor correctly configured?"

then I used "-keep" on the database code and generated code path. eg:

-keep class com.example.room.**  {* ;}

but I got the new error, So now I really don't know how to do it。

SLF4J(I): Connected with provider of type [ch.qos.logback.classic.spi.LogbackServiceProvider]
Exception in thread "AWT-EventQueue-0" java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:77)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
	at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstanceWithCaller(Constructor.java:499)
	at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:480)
	at ayr.a(KClassUtil.jvmAndroid.kt:44)
	at ayr.a(KClassUtil.jvmAndroid.kt:29)
	at com.example.room.di.DatabaseCreatorFactory_jvmKt$getDatabaseBuilder$$inlined$databaseBuilder$default$1.invoke(Room.jvm.kt:57)
	at com.example.room.di.DatabaseCreatorFactory_jvmKt$getDatabaseBuilder$$inlined$databaseBuilder$default$1.invoke(Room.jvm.kt:57)
	at awc$a.a(RoomDatabase.jvmNative.kt:516)
	at com.example.room.di.DatabaseCreatorFactory_jvmKt.getRoomDatabase(DatabaseCreatorFactory.jvm.kt:35)
	at com.example.room.di.DatabaseCreatorFactory.createRoomDatabase(DatabaseCreatorFactory.jvm.kt:12)
	at com.example.room.di.LocalDb.db_delegate$lambda$0(DatabaseCreatorFactory.jvm.kt:17)
	at kotlin.SynchronizedLazyImpl.getValue(LazyJVM.kt:83)
	at com.example.room.di.LocalDb.getDb(DatabaseCreatorFactory.jvm.kt:17)
	at org.lodestone.app.c.invokeSuspend(Main.kt:22)
	at kotlin.coroutines.jvm.internal.BaseContinuationImpl.resumeWith(ContinuationImpl.kt:33)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.DispatchedTask.run(DispatchedTask.kt:100)
	at vr.a(FlushCoroutineDispatcher.skiko.kt:93)
	at vr.invoke(FlushCoroutineDispatcher.skiko.kt:80)
	at vo.a(FlushCoroutineDispatcher.skiko.kt:102)
	at vo.a(FlushCoroutineDispatcher.skiko.kt:80)
	at adn.b(ComposeSceneRecomposer.skiko.kt:91)
	at abg.a(BaseComposeScene.skiko.kt:165)
	at ade.a(ComposeSceneMediator.desktop.kt:574)
	at ade.invoke(ComposeSceneMediator.desktop.kt:572)
	at aob.b(SwingInteropContainer.desktop.kt:229)
	at acr.onRender(ComposeSceneMediator.desktop.kt:572)
	at org.jetbrains.skiko.SkiaLayer.update$skiko(SkiaLayer.awt.kt:533)
	at org.jetbrains.skiko.redrawer.AWTRedrawer.update(AWTRedrawer.kt:54)
	at org.jetbrains.skiko.redrawer.Direct3DRedrawer.redrawImmediately(Direct3DRedrawer.kt:74)
	at org.jetbrains.skiko.SkiaLayer.tryRedrawImmediately(SkiaLayer.awt.kt:373)
	at org.jetbrains.skiko.SkiaLayer.paint(SkiaLayer.awt.kt:346)
	at aeg.paint(WindowSkiaLayerComponent.desktop.kt:64)
	at java.desktop/javax.swing.JComponent.paintChildren(JComponent.java:952)
	at java.desktop/javax.swing.JComponent.paint(JComponent.java:1128)
	at java.desktop/javax.swing.JLayeredPane.paint(JLayeredPane.java:586)
	at java.desktop/javax.swing.JComponent.paintChildren(JComponent.java:952)
	at java.desktop/javax.swing.JComponent.paint(JComponent.java:1128)
	at aqv.a(Window.desktop.kt:630)
	at aqv.invoke(Window.desktop.kt:615)
	at aoy.a(AwtWindow.desktop.kt:78)
	at aoy.invoke(AwtWindow.desktop.kt:76)
	at anc.a(UpdateEffect.desktop.kt:59)
	at anc.invoke(UpdateEffect.desktop.kt:55)
	at androidx.compose.runtime.snapshots.Snapshot$Companion.observe(Snapshot.kt:2442)
	at androidx.compose.runtime.snapshots.SnapshotStateObserver$ObservedScopeMap.observe(SnapshotStateObserver.kt:505)
	at androidx.compose.runtime.snapshots.SnapshotStateObserver.observeReads(SnapshotStateObserver.kt:261)
	at amy.b(UpdateEffect.desktop.kt:55)
	at amy.a(UpdateEffect.desktop.kt:64)
	at amy.invoke(UpdateEffect.desktop.kt:47)
	at androidx.compose.runtime.DisposableEffectImpl.onRemembered(Effects.kt:82)
	at androidx.compose.runtime.CompositionImpl$RememberEventDispatcher.dispatchRememberObservers(Composition.kt:1364)
	at androidx.compose.runtime.CompositionImpl.applyChangesInLocked(Composition.kt:992)
	at androidx.compose.runtime.CompositionImpl.applyChanges(Composition.kt:1013)
	at androidx.compose.runtime.Recomposer.composeInitial$runtime(Recomposer.kt:1150)
	at androidx.compose.runtime.CompositionImpl.composeInitial(Composition.kt:649)
	at androidx.compose.runtime.CompositionImpl.setContent(Composition.kt:635)
	at aoq.invokeSuspend(Application.desktop.kt:221)
	at kotlin.coroutines.jvm.internal.BaseContinuationImpl.resumeWith(ContinuationImpl.kt:33)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.DispatchedTask.run(DispatchedTask.kt:100)
	at java.desktop/java.awt.event.InvocationEvent.dispatch(InvocationEvent.java:318)
	at java.desktop/java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEventImpl(EventQueue.java:773)
	at java.desktop/java.awt.EventQueue$4.run(EventQueue.java:720)
	at java.desktop/java.awt.EventQueue$4.run(EventQueue.java:714)
	at java.base/java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(AccessController.java:399)
	at java.base/java.security.ProtectionDomain$JavaSecurityAccessImpl.doIntersectionPrivilege(ProtectionDomain.java:86)
	at java.desktop/java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(EventQueue.java:742)
	at java.desktop/java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForFilters(EventDispatchThread.java:203)
	at java.desktop/java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForFilter(EventDispatchThread.java:124)
	at java.desktop/java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:113)
	at java.desktop/java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:109)
	at java.desktop/java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:101)
	at java.desktop/java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.java:90)
	Suppressed: kotlinx.coroutines.internal.DiagnosticCoroutineContextException: [abx$b@4d3249cd, androidx.compose.runtime.BroadcastFrameClock@4da3912d, StandaloneCoroutine{Cancelling}@7be3a417, vo@55ce55d]
Caused by: java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
	at azs.a(AtomicFU.kt:39)
	at azs.a(AtomicFU.kt:41)
	at axg.<init>(CloseBarrier.kt:43)
	at awc.<init>(RoomDatabase.jvmNative.kt:77)
	at com.example.room.database.AppDatabase.<init>(AppDatabase.kt:19)
	at com.example.room.database.AppDatabase_Impl.<init>(AppDatabase_Impl.kt:33)
	... 74 more
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Must be integer type
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicIntegerFieldUpdater$AtomicIntegerFieldUpdaterImpl.<init>(AtomicIntegerFieldUpdater.java:417)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicIntegerFieldUpdater.newUpdater(AtomicIntegerFieldUpdater.java:93)
	at azt.<clinit>(AtomicFU.kt:315)
	... 80 more
[Incubating] Problems report is available at: file:///E:/libs/kmp/desktop-template/build/reports/problems/problems-report.html

Deprecated Gradle features were used in this build, making it incompatible with Gradle 9.0.

You can use '--warning-mode all' to show the individual deprecation warnings and determine if they come from your own scripts or plugins.

For more on this, please refer to https://docs.gradle.org/8.11.1/userguide/command_line_interface.html#sec:command_line_warnings in the Gradle documentation.

BUILD SUCCESSFUL in 33s
46 actionable tasks: 3 executed, 43 up-to-date

So it turns out Proguard for KMP Desktop does not consume library rules like in Android (https://github.com/Guardsquare/proguard/issues/337) so the rules must be set by the project and we should document them. I will be adding documentation in https://developer.android.com/kotlin/multiplatform/room#jvm-(desktop)

re comment#12: As for your issue Caused by: java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError, can you try with Room version 2.7.0-rc01 ? We removed the usages of AtomicFu from the JVM / Android variants and based on my testing and after adding the progaurd rule -keep class * extends androidx.room.RoomDatabase { <init>(); } and enabling obfuscation, things work for me.