Change theme
Help
Press space for more information.
Show links for this issue (Shortcut: i, l)
Copy issue ID
Previous Issue (Shortcut: k)
Next Issue (Shortcut: j)
Sign in to use full features.
Vote: I am impacted
Notification menu
Refresh (Shortcut: Shift+r)
Go home (Shortcut: u)
Use Markdown for this comment
Set severity, which reflects how much the issue affects the use of the product
Assign issue to yourself
Pending code changes (auto-populated)
[ID: 84651]
[ID: 591562]
[ID: 591587]
[ID: 591666]
[ID: 85206]
Set the version(s) of the product affected by this issue (comma-separated list)
Set the version(s) of the product in which the issue should be fixed (comma-separated list)
Set the version(s) of the product in which the issue fix was verified (comma-separated list)
Set if this issue occurs in production
Set Reporter
Set Type
Set priority, which reflects how soon the issue should be fixed
Set Status
Set Assignee
Set Verifier
Remove item
View or edit staffing
View issue level access limits(Press Alt + Right arrow for more information)
Description
Let's break down the automation features offered by Google Pixel (Rules), Samsung (Modes and Routines, formerly Bixby Routines), and Apple (Shortcuts), comparing their strengths and weaknesses, and then propose feature requests for Pixel's Rules.
Comparison of Pixel Rules, Samsung Routines, and Apple Shortcuts
Based on the comparison, Pixel's Rules feature is significantly lagging behind. Here are feature requests to improve it, following the requested format:
1. Expanded Triggers
2. Expanded Actions
3. Conditional Logic (If/Then/Else)
4. Variables and Data Passing
5. Third-Party App Integration
6. User Interface Improvements
By implementing these feature requests, Google could transform Rules from a barely-functional feature into a powerful automation tool that rivals Samsung's Routines and even approaches the capabilities of Apple's Shortcuts. This would significantly enhance the Pixel user experience and make the platform more competitive.