Obsolete
Status Update
No update yet.
Comments
ch...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com
I just noticed that calling .showInfoWindow() on the marker DOES place it on top of the others.
Sadly I want no info window at all. For now the trick is to create a 0px * 0px view in my own InfoWindowAdapter.
Sadly I want no info window at all. For now the trick is to create a 0px * 0px view in my own InfoWindowAdapter.
ch...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com
🥪 Regression verification projects/62121018386/locations/us-central1/workflows/sandwich-verification-workflow-prod/executions/7218d9cf-5cd8-4d97-9040-0b241d8aa065 job 1059d882610000 for test: ChromiumPerf/win-10_laptop_low_end-perf/jetstream2/Air.Worst/JetStream2
reproduced the regression with statistic: {'control_median': 160, 'lower': -23.94343011993092, 'p_value': 6.146728992462158e-08, 'treatment_median': 127.79683161848766, 'upper': -14.961684215201199}.
Proceed to bisection.
reproduced the regression with statistic: {'control_median': 160, 'lower': -23.94343011993092, 'p_value': 6.146728992462158e-08, 'treatment_median': 127.79683161848766, 'upper': -14.961684215201199}.
Proceed to bisection.
ch...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com
You can now change a Marker's icon (thanks!), however this functionality is still required!
I have tried the workaround of a 0 sized view as below, but the view actually takes up the whole width of the map and half the height (i.e. all the space above the Marker) - which stops all user interaction with the top half of the map. (If you call show then hide then the Marker is placed back to it's original z-order).
zeroSizedInfoWindow = new View(getActivity());
zeroSizedInfoWindow.setLayoutParams(new ViewGroup.LayoutParams(0, 0));
I have tried the workaround of a 0 sized view as below, but the view actually takes up the whole width of the map and half the height (i.e. all the space above the Marker) - which stops all user interaction with the top half of the map. (If you call show then hide then the Marker is placed back to it's original z-order).
zeroSizedInfoWindow = new View(getActivity());
zeroSizedInfoWindow.setLayoutParams(new ViewGroup.LayoutParams(0, 0));
ch...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com
Automatic bisection started for measurement:
ChromiumPerf/win-10_laptop_low_end-perf/jetstream2/Air.Worst/JetStream2
To opt-out of further automatically started bisections for this issue, please
add the <b>Chromeperf-Auto-BisectOptOut</b> label.
ChromiumPerf/win-10_laptop_low_end-perf/jetstream2/Air.Worst/JetStream2
To opt-out of further automatically started bisections for this issue, please
add the <b>Chromeperf-Auto-BisectOptOut</b> label.
ch...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com
[Comment deleted]
ch...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com
Is it possible to know if this issue is being solved ? I really need to set z-orders of some markers, and I can't use the infoWindow trick as I want 4 markers to be always above 4 others markers.
Thanks...
Thanks...
ch...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com
I too want to show certain markers on top of others such that if there are two types of markers Red and Blue, i want the Red marker to stay above of Blue marker.
Description
Internal (Googlers-only) Reports:
- Chromium:
(Legacy) Chromeperf Report:
Top 1 regressions (out of 3, with 2 improvements) in this group:
- ChromiumPerf/win-10_laptop_low_end-perf/jetstream2/Air.Worst/JetStream2
15.34%: 156.6193 -> 132.5903 unitless
Top 1 affected measurements in win-10_laptop_low_end-perf:
- jetstream2/Air.Worst/JetStream2
15.34%: 156.6193 -> 132.5903 unitless
Regressions grouped by jetstream2 includes data from the following benchmarks with listed owners:
jetstream2: hablich@chromium.org, tcwang@chromium.org
Commits in this range:
Chromium Commit Position:
V8 Commit Position:
WebRTC Git Hash: