Assigned
Status Update
Comments
ba...@google.com <ba...@google.com>
on...@google.com <on...@google.com> #2
I had the same problem!
I could solve it by putting the .aidl file in an aidl directory.
Look at the attached screenshot to see the project structure.
I could solve it by putting the .aidl file in an aidl directory.
Look at the attached screenshot to see the project structure.
Description
Please describe your requested enhancement. Good feature requests will solve common problems or enable new use cases.
What you would like to accomplish:
Add support for custom labels for RootSyncs and RepoSyncs
How this might work:
Is there plan to add support for additional labels for RootSyncs and RepoSyncs that will reflect in their respective reconiler deployments? If not, can this be added please?
For example, in cx's org they like to label every workload so that costing can be billed to departments/teams internally.
If applicable, reasons why alternative solutions are not sufficient:
Annotations instead of labels could potentially be supported by copying all user-specified labels from Root/RepoSync objects to their corresponding reconciler Deployments. For consistency, we might consider propagating labels to other resources that reconciler manager creates (such as service accounts) too.
But, cx need some way to apply labels we want on the objects created/used for reconciling in the Root/RepoSync objects themselves
Other information (workarounds you have tried, documentation consulted, etc):
Cx has raised a request through git profile: