Fixed
Status Update
No update yet.
Comments
ti...@gmail.com
I notice the same issue and LogCat shows the following message:
Google Play services out of date. Requires 3159100 but found 3136130
Google Play services out of date. Requires 3159100 but found 3136130
ti...@gmail.com
Same here.
"Google Play services out of date. Requires 3159100 but found 3136130"
"Google Play services out of date. Requires 3159100 but found 3136130"
sa...@chromium.org
me as well....
Google Play services out of date. Requires 3159100 but found 3136130
Google Play services out of date. Requires 3159100 but found 3136130
ph...@chromium.org
I was hopeful that the release of API 18 (4.3) would have created a solution to this, unfortunately it includes version 3158130
ti...@gmail.com
Having the same issue:
07-25 00:03:54.998: W/GooglePlayServicesUtil(27293): Google Play services out of date. Requires 3159100 but found 3158130
07-25 00:03:54.998: W/GooglePlayServicesUtil(27293): Google Play services out of date. Requires 3159100 but found 3158130
sh...@chromium.org
same
ti...@gmail.com
SAME ! - Google can't do sth working in 100 percent?
th...@chromium.org
same issue - Google Play services out of date. Requires 3159100 but found 3158130
pe...@chromium.org
Having the same issure:
07-26 03:14:00.731: W/GooglePlayServicesUtil(2566): Google Play services out of date. Requires 3159100 but found 3136130
07-26 03:14:00.731: W/GooglePlayServicesUtil(2566): Google Play services out of date. Requires 3159100 but found 3136130
ik...@chromium.org
API 18 (4.3) same issue
07-26 03:54:03.303: W/GooglePlayServicesUtil(1207): Google Play services out of date. Requires 3159100 but found 3158130
07-26 03:54:03.303: W/GooglePlayServicesUtil(1207): Google Play services out of date. Requires 3159100 but found 3158130
ti...@gmail.com
Same issue here.
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
Same issue here. How can i fix this bug?
at...@chromium.org
We're working on this. I don't have an ETA yet other than the maddeningly vague "soon".
at...@chromium.org
Thanks for the update @sbarta. It is good that you are keeping us informed. This is a very critical and blocking bug for anyone developing with maps.
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
FYI also getting same with PlusClient sign in, so this is not just a maps issue:
ConnectionResult.SERVICE_VERSION_UPDATE_REQUIRED
07-30 12:35:50.059: W/GooglePlayServicesUtil(16054): Google Play services out of date. Requires 3159100 but found 1013
ConnectionResult.SERVICE_VERSION_UPDATE_REQUIRED
07-30 12:35:50.059: W/GooglePlayServicesUtil(16054): Google Play services out of date. Requires 3159100 but found 1013
ik...@chromium.org
Same page here!
07-31 22:47:40.277: W/GooglePlayServicesUtil(1009): Google Play services out of date. Requires 3159100 but found 3158130
Thing is: we work under timelines too, and we need this fix quick! I cannot go wondering around asking for cellphones all over the place... I used to have this fixed with my emulators!!
07-31 22:47:40.277: W/GooglePlayServicesUtil(1009): Google Play services out of date. Requires 3159100 but found 3158130
Thing is: we work under timelines too, and we need this fix quick! I cannot go wondering around asking for cellphones all over the place... I used to have this fixed with my emulators!!
ik...@chromium.org
aa...@google.com
The Play Services team knows about this issue and is working on it with a high priority. The fix for this will go in the same emulator image in the same timeframe. Sorry I'm being vague about when it'll go out; I don't want to tell you something and then have us miss it. I'll update this bug when I know more.
ms...@chromium.org
Just would like to add that we are experiencing this on device as well, not just in AVD. Not sure if that matters...
ms...@chromium.org
Any ETA on this fix? Appreciate your reply.
is...@google.com
There's no ETA yet. I think a new version of the Google Play Services add-on in the SDK manager is going out today, but this doesn't help the issue of needing to update the emulator system images.
Description
Steps to reproduce the problem:
1. Open attached multiple_table_header_rows_split_at_page_break_and_overlap_on_next_page.html in browser
2. Ctrl + P / Print the page
3. If the newlines before the table are enough such that only the first row of the table header is at the end of the page, you will notice that the table headers are split across pages and the excess rows are rendered at the start of the next page on top of the next page's repeating header text. (see attached chrome_header_overlap.png)
In case newlines are not enough, please edit the html page to add/remove newlines such that the only the first row of the table header is displayed.
What is the expected behavior?
Expected is the table repeating header rows are kept together (they cannot be split)
Or support CSS "page-break-inside: avoid" for <thead> element in order to control this behavior.
What went wrong?
The table headers are split across pages and the excess rows are rendered at the start of the next page on top of the next page's repeating header text. (see attached chrome_header_overlap.png)
Also tried adding CSS "page-break-inside: avoid" for <thead> element but it does nothing for Chrome.
Did this work before? N/A
Chrome version: 80.0.3987.87 Channel: stable
OS Version: 10.0
Flash Version:
IE 11/Edge handles this as expected.
Firefox doesn't handle this by default but can be handled by adding CSS "page-break-inside: avoid" for <thead> element.