Status Update
Comments
fs...@gmail.com <fs...@gmail.com> #2
1. Have you saw crash in real device or only in simulators?
2. Do you use dynamic feature for language ID?
yb...@google.com <yb...@google.com> #3
Tested on Android 12 Emulator with custom executor, but cannot repro this issue.
de...@gmail.com <de...@gmail.com> #4
-
Second crash in the description is from a real device. Experienced it myself on two different Xiaomi phones, plus lots of crashes from users in the Google Play console.
-
Dynamic features are not used in the application.
As a wild guess, I have downgraded build tools from 31.0.0 to 30.0.3, compileSdk from 31 to 30, and moved all work with Language ID to the service in a separate process (just to be sure that crash can kill secondary process instead of main). This combination is in beta for 2 days by now and I don't see any SIGSEGV crashes.
yb...@google.com <yb...@google.com> #5
Hmm, I feel the crash might be something related to separate/secondary process.
I also changed compileSdk and targetSDK to 31 but still cannot repro this issue.
yb...@google.com <yb...@google.com> #6
On the contrary, there was no separate process before, when crashes started.
In the new build (with the aforementioned changes) I can see SIGSEGV crash, but only one instead of dozens and it has a bit different backtrace:
signal 11 (SIGSEGV), code 1 (SEGV_MAPERR)
liblanguage_id_jni.so (offset 0x11e000)
backtrace:
#00 pc 000000000003c7c0 /data/app/azagroup.reedy-mF7zTu2bv_ELlbFArwNgqA==/split_config.arm64_v8a.apk!lib/arm64-v8a/liblanguage_id_jni.so (offset 0x11e000)
#00 pc 000000000003b960 /data/app/azagroup.reedy-mF7zTu2bv_ELlbFArwNgqA==/split_config.arm64_v8a.apk!lib/arm64-v8a/liblanguage_id_jni.so (offset 0x11e000)
#00 pc 000000000003bb48 /data/app/azagroup.reedy-mF7zTu2bv_ELlbFArwNgqA==/split_config.arm64_v8a.apk!lib/arm64-v8a/liblanguage_id_jni.so (offset 0x11e000)
#00 pc 000000000003bafc /data/app/azagroup.reedy-mF7zTu2bv_ELlbFArwNgqA==/split_config.arm64_v8a.apk!lib/arm64-v8a/liblanguage_id_jni.so (offset 0x11e000)
#00 pc 0000000000036c98 /data/app/azagroup.reedy-mF7zTu2bv_ELlbFArwNgqA==/split_config.arm64_v8a.apk!lib/arm64-v8a/liblanguage_id_jni.so (offset 0x11e000)
#00 pc 0000000000032714 /data/app/azagroup.reedy-mF7zTu2bv_ELlbFArwNgqA==/split_config.arm64_v8a.apk!lib/arm64-v8a/liblanguage_id_jni.so (offset 0x11e000)
#00 pc 0000000000031cac /data/app/azagroup.reedy-mF7zTu2bv_ELlbFArwNgqA==/split_config.arm64_v8a.apk!lib/arm64-v8a/liblanguage_id_jni.so (offset 0x11e000)
#00 pc 0000000000057438 /data/app/azagroup.reedy-mF7zTu2bv_ELlbFArwNgqA==/oat/arm64/base.odex (offset 0x57000)
yb...@google.com <yb...@google.com> #7
FYI, ML Kit launched a new language ID SDK in the latest release, which uses a new language ID model.
Could you try the new SDK version(17.0.0) to check if you can still repro this native crash? Thanks!
Description
Version used: 1.0
Devices/Android versions reproduced on: NA
I have one entity that contains a set of enums. For example:
@Entity
data class Person(
@field:PrimaryKey val id: Int,
val name: String,
val favouriteDays: Set<Day>)
enum class Day {
MONDAY,
TUESDAY,
WEDNESDAY,
THURSDAY,
FRIDAY,
SATURDAY,
SUNDAY
}
I want to store this entity in a single table. In many cases, especially with enums, we could use a single bit mask to save the list as a number in the database.
Here's one example of what I wanted to do:
object DayCollectionTypeConverter {
@JvmStatic
@TypeConverter
fun daysConverter(days: Set<Day>): Int {
var value = 0
for (day in days) {
value += (1 shl day.ordinal)
}
return value
}
@JvmStatic
@TypeConverter
fun daysConverter(value: Int): Set<Day> {
val set = mutableSetOf<Day>()
for (day in Day.values()) {
if (value and 1 shl day.ordinal != 0) {
set.add(day)
}
}
return set
}
}
That code doesn't work as intended because @TypeConverter would allow me to convert one Day object, but not a collection (or set, list, etc) of Days.
I suggest a new annotation is created so the developer can specify how to save a Collection into a single column in the same table.