Fixed
Status Update
Comments
il...@google.com <il...@google.com> #2
Yigit, do you have time to fix it?
reemission of the same liveData is racy
reemission of the same liveData is racy
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #3
yea i'll take it.
il...@google.com <il...@google.com> #4
Thanks for the detailed analysis. This may not be an issue anymore since we've started using Main.immediate there but I' not sure; I'll try to create a test case.
il...@google.com <il...@google.com> #5
just emitting same live data reproduces the issue.
@Test
fun raceTest() {
val subLiveData = MutableLiveData(1)
val subject = liveData(testScope.coroutineContext) {
emitSource(subLiveData)
emitSource(subLiveData) //crashes
}
subject.addObserver().apply {
testScope.advanceUntilIdle()
}
}
@Test
fun raceTest() {
val subLiveData = MutableLiveData(1)
val subject = liveData(testScope.coroutineContext) {
emitSource(subLiveData)
emitSource(subLiveData) //crashes
}
subject.addObserver().apply {
testScope.advanceUntilIdle()
}
}
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #6
With 2.2.0-alpha04 (that use Main.immediate), the issue seems to be still there (I tested it by calling emitSource() twice, like your test case)
lo...@gmail.com <lo...@gmail.com> #7
yea sorry immediate does not fix it.
I actually have a WIP fix for it:
https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/platform/frameworks/support/+/1112186
if your case is the one i found (emitting same LiveData multiple times, as shown in #5) you can work around it by adding a dummy transformation.
val subLiveData = MutableLiveData(1)
val subject = liveData(testScope.coroutineContext) {
emitSource(subLiveData.map {it })
emitSource(subLiveData.map {it} )
}
I actually have a WIP fix for it:
if your case is the one i found (emitting same LiveData multiple times, as shown in #5) you can work around it by adding a dummy transformation.
val subLiveData = MutableLiveData(1)
val subject = liveData(testScope.coroutineContext) {
emitSource(subLiveData.map {it })
emitSource(subLiveData.map {it} )
}
mu...@gmail.com <mu...@gmail.com> #8
Project: platform/frameworks/support
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit af12e75e6b4110f48e44ca121466943909de8f06
Author: Yigit Boyar <yboyar@google.com>
Date: Tue Sep 03 12:58:11 2019
Fix coroutine livedata race condition
This CL fixes a bug in liveData builder where emitting same
LiveData source twice would make it crash because the second
emission registry could possibly happen before first one is
removed as source.
We fix it by using a suspending dispose function. It does feel
a bit hacky but we cannot make DisposableHandle.dispose async
and we do not want to block there. This does not mean that there
is a problem if developer disposes it manually since our emit
functions take care of making sure it disposes (and there is
no other way to add source to the underlying MediatorLiveData)
Bug: 140249349
Test: BuildLiveDataTest#raceTest_*
Change-Id: I0b464c242a583da4669af195cf2504e2adc4de40
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/2.2.0-alpha05.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/current.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/public_plus_experimental_2.2.0-alpha05.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/public_plus_experimental_current.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/restricted_2.2.0-alpha05.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/restricted_current.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/src/main/java/androidx/lifecycle/CoroutineLiveData.kt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/src/test/java/androidx/lifecycle/BuildLiveDataTest.kt
https://android-review.googlesource.com/1112186
https://goto.google.com/android-sha1/af12e75e6b4110f48e44ca121466943909de8f06
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit af12e75e6b4110f48e44ca121466943909de8f06
Author: Yigit Boyar <yboyar@google.com>
Date: Tue Sep 03 12:58:11 2019
Fix coroutine livedata race condition
This CL fixes a bug in liveData builder where emitting same
LiveData source twice would make it crash because the second
emission registry could possibly happen before first one is
removed as source.
We fix it by using a suspending dispose function. It does feel
a bit hacky but we cannot make DisposableHandle.dispose async
and we do not want to block there. This does not mean that there
is a problem if developer disposes it manually since our emit
functions take care of making sure it disposes (and there is
no other way to add source to the underlying MediatorLiveData)
Bug: 140249349
Test: BuildLiveDataTest#raceTest_*
Change-Id: I0b464c242a583da4669af195cf2504e2adc4de40
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/2.2.0-alpha05.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/current.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/public_plus_experimental_2.2.0-alpha05.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/public_plus_experimental_current.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/restricted_2.2.0-alpha05.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/restricted_current.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/src/main/java/androidx/lifecycle/CoroutineLiveData.kt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/src/test/java/androidx/lifecycle/BuildLiveDataTest.kt
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #9
Your destinationId in setPopUpTo need to be either id of the graph itself or better be id of the startDestination. You can also achieve this behavior with navigation graph xml attributes popUpTo and popUpToInclusive.
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #10
I'm trying to use popUpTo with popUpToInclusive exactly as instructed, and it works fine for normal actions. However, I can't get it to work for global actions! Clear Task used to work perfectly for global actions.
il...@google.com <il...@google.com> #11
Re #10 - please file a new bug with a sample project that reproduces your issue.
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #12
Re #11 I created a new issue detailing my problem and containing a sample project here: https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/116831650
h....@gmail.com <h....@gmail.com> #13
ok
Description
DETAILS:-
The destination home is an activity with a NavHostFragment (FirstFragment.kt) which initially navigates to the second destination (SecondActivity.kt), then immediately comes back to the FirstFragment, and then navigates to third destination (FirstPopupFragment.kt). (Navigation can be observed in the attached screen-record).
LOG:-
2018-05-27 20:39:52.794 3289-3289/? E/AndroidRuntime: FATAL EXCEPTION: main
Process: com.example.cyrilnoah.navigationegapp, PID: 3289
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: navigation destination com.example.cyrilnoah.navigationegapp:id/action_first_to_first_popup is unknown to this NavController
at androidx.navigation.NavController.navigate(NavController.java:605)
at androidx.navigation.NavController.navigate(NavController.java:565)
at androidx.navigation.NavController.navigate(NavController.java:553)
at com.example.cyrilnoah.navigationegapp.FirstFragment$onViewCreated$1.onClick(FirstFragment.kt:40)
at android.view.View.performClick(View.java:6579)
at android.view.View.performClickInternal(View.java:6556)
at android.view.View.access$3100(View.java:777)
at android.view.View$PerformClick.run(View.java:25660)
at android.os.Handler.handleCallback(Handler.java:819)
at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage(Handler.java:99)
at android.os.Looper.loop(Looper.java:164)
at android.app.ActivityThread.main(ActivityThread.java:6656)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
at com.android.internal.os.RuntimeInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run(RuntimeInit.java:438)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main(ZygoteInit.java:823)
Component used:
"android.arch.navigation:navigation-fragment-ktx:$nav_version"
"android.arch.navigation:navigation-ui-ktx:$nav_version"
Version used:
nav_version = '1.0.0-alpha01'
Devices/Android versions reproduced on:
Tested on Pixel 2 XL (emulator), and Xiaomi Mi Max 2 (real device). Probably crashes on all, not so sure.
- Sample project to trigger the issue.
(Project attached below)
- A screenrecord or screenshots showing the issue (if UI related).
(Screen-record attached below)