Add # of reviews to the Place Details Results [35820858]

Fixed

Feature Request

Status Update

No update yet.

Description

to...@gmail.com

created issue #1

Jul 17, 2011 05:58PM

Currently the Place Details Results contains the rating of a business which is great. However, it does not show the number of reviews for the place which is a very important piece of information in deciding whether a rating is useful or not. A place with a high rating and high number of reviews is much more valuable than a place with the same rating but low number of reviews.

For example, for the Burma Superstar place page (

http://maps.google.com/maps/place?q=burma+superstar&cid=4754924583893187023), the API returns that the place has a rating of 4.0. It would be great it I could get that the 4.0 rating came from 3569 reviews, which is on the place page.

*********************************************************
For developers viewing this issue: please click the 'star' icon to be
notified of future changes, and to let us know how many of you are
interested in seeing it resolved.
*********************************************************

Comments

th...@google.com <th...@google.com> Jul 31, 2012 02:55AM

Assigned to jt...@google.com.

le...@hookedmedia.net <le...@hookedmedia.net> #3Apr 5, 2013 01:12AM

I'm not. Ashutosh?

lu...@google.com <lu...@google.com> Jun 4, 2013 06:50AM

Status: New

ya...@gmail.com <ya...@gmail.com> #4Mar 25, 2014 08:45AM

This is interesting. The rotation vector (or any sensor for that matter) should not perform differently from the Java API at the native API. Villus, I could not access the video on the bug you linked to. Can you please attach it to this bug ?

ev...@gmail.com <ev...@gmail.com> #6Dec 3, 2015 07:38PM

Ashutosh, have you had a chance to take a look here?

er...@fosterinteractive.com <er...@fosterinteractive.com> #7May 25, 2016 03:44PM

On Pixel 2 `adb logcat` reports its using 200000us sampling period.
This is 5Hz (SENSOR_DELAY_NORMAL), instead of the desired/expected 50Hz (SENSOR_DELAY_GAME).

01-10 16:14:10.800 794 820 D CHRE : @ 2685.808: +: id 10, otherClientPresent 1, mode 3
01-10 16:14:10.803 794 820 D CHRE : @ 2685.811: [ImuCal] Dynamic sensor configuration: high-performance.
01-10 16:14:10.803 794 820 D CHRE : @ 2685.811: sensorType 9 allowed 1: mergedMode 3, otherClientPresent 1
01-10 16:14:10.803 794 820 I VSC : @ 2685.811: [VSC SLPI] VscSensor type 65545: Enabling with report period 0 and sampling period 200000000
01-10 16:14:10.803 794 820 I VSC : @ 2685.811: {Fusion} configure fusion 9 200000us 0us.
01-10 16:14:10.804 794 820 I VSC : @ 2685.811: [VSC] Request sensor 65537, sample_duration 14 ms, report_duration 0 ms
01-10 16:14:10.804 794 820 I VSC : @ 2685.812: [VSC] Request sensor 65540, sample_duration 5 ms, report_duration 0 ms
01-10 16:14:10.805 794 820 D CHRE : @ 2685.812: sensorType 11 allowed 1: mergedMode 3, otherClientPresent 1
01-10 16:14:10.807 794 820 D CHRE : @ 2685.815: sensorType 13 allowed 0: mergedMode 3, otherClientPresent 0
01-10 16:14:10.810 794 820 I VSC : @ 2685.818: [VSC SLPI] VscSensor type 65546: Enabling with report period 0 and sampling period 200000000
01-10 16:14:10.811 794 820 I VSC : @ 2685.818: {Fusion} configure fusion 10 200000us 0us.
01-10 16:14:10.811 794 820 I VSC : @ 2685.818: [VSC] Request sensor 65537, sample_duration 14 ms, report_duration 0 ms
01-10 16:14:10.811 794 820 I VSC : @ 2685.819: [VSC] Request sensor 65540, sample_duration 5 ms, report_duration 0 ms
01-10 16:14:10.814 794 820 I VSC : @ 2685.822: [VSC SLPI] VscSensor type 65547: Enabling with report period 0 and sampling period 200000000
01-10 16:14:10.815 794 820 I VSC : @ 2685.822: {Fusion} configure fusion 11 200000us 0us.
01-10 16:14:10.815 794 820 I VSC : @ 2685.823: [VSC] Request sensor 65537, sample_duration 14 ms, report_duration 0 ms
01-10 16:14:10.816 794 820 I VSC : @ 2685.824: [VSC] Request sensor 65540, sample_duration 5 ms, report_duration 0 ms
01-10 16:14:10.816 794 820 I VSC : @ 2685.824: [VSC] Request sensor 65538, sample_duration 14 ms, report_duration 0 ms

ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #8May 25, 2016 09:20PM

If I replace:
ASensorEventQueue_enableSensor(sSensorEventQueue, sensor);
ASensorEventQueue_setEventRate(sSensorEventQueue, sensor, 20000);
with:
success = ASensorEventQueue_registerSensor(sSensorEventQueue, sensor, 20000, 0);

in `Sensors.cpp` in the above `AndroidGyroNDK.zip` project, then sensors appear to update at the expected rate.

ev...@gmail.com <ev...@gmail.com> #9May 26, 2016 02:36AM

Nice find, but it seems that this workaround requires the min sdk version to be at least 26, which would exclude a lot of phones.

no...@udr.com <no...@udr.com> #10May 26, 2016 01:38PM

Acknowledged.

The fact that `ASensorEventQueue_registerSensor(sSensorEventQueue, sensor, 20000, 0)` works demonstrates that the sensor can provide updates at 50Hz via native code.

So, now we need to get the older API variant to work:
ASensorEventQueue_enableSensor(sSensorEventQueue, sensor);
ASensorEventQueue_setEventRate(sSensorEventQueue, sensor, 20000);

As best I can tell, that second line is not actually doing anything.

og...@gmail.com <og...@gmail.com> #11May 26, 2016 01:40PM

Thanks Fred. Do you mind if we pick this up after the Android FC & Bootcamp (2/9) ?

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #12May 26, 2016 01:59PM

Any update here?

ch...@gmail.com <ch...@gmail.com> #13May 26, 2016 04:27PM

Thank you for the thorough report with test app (and your patience).

In the Pixel 2 case, this is a bug in the sensor HAL implementation for certain sensor types, where the device is unable to properly change the sampling rate after the sensor has been enabled. Since the pre-26 NDK API only allows for enabling a sensor with a default rate, this bug means that the subsequent call to ASensorEventQueue_setEventRate has no effect, so unfortunately there is no workaround possible in pure native code. Although I can't dig into the inner workings of other devices, I suspect it's the same issue there as well (in the Pixel 2 case the issue lies in integration with code supplied by a prominent chipset vendor).

I can think of two ways to work around this issue:

1. Use ASensorEventQueue_registerSensor only on devices running API 26+. To avoid link-time issues when running on an older platform that doesn't provide this function, you can access it through dlsym() like so:

#include <dlfcn.h>

typedef int (NDK_registerSensorFunction)(
ASensorEventQueue *queue, int32_t samplingPeriodUs, int64_t maxBatchReportLatency);

if (<API level >= 26>) {
void *handle = dlopen("libandroid.so", RTLD_LAZY);
if (handle != NULL) {
NDK_registerSensorFunction *registerSensor = (NDK_registerSensorFunction *)
dlsym(handle, "ASensorEventQueue_registerSensor");
if (fptr != NULL) {
registerSensor(queue, samplingPeriod, 0);
}
// probably want to call dlclose() too
}
}

2. Like in the comments from your sample application, add a Java-level request for the sensor before initializing the NDK sensor request. There can only be 1 effective sampling rate for a sensor, which is always the fastest of all open requests. So assuming that no other app is already asking for the sensor, this will guarantee that the sensor is enabled with the rate you want, and the NDK client will get updates at the intended rate. This workaround should avoid the issue on pre-API 26 devices as well, but it imposes some overhead - you might be able to avoid leaving the Java client enabled with a flow like this (haven't tested this but should work in theory):

a. Enable sensor from Java at expected rate (e.g. 200Hz)
b. Enable sensor at NDK (with default rate)
c. Set event rate in NDK to rate matching (a)
d. Disable Java request

Hopefully you'll be able to use one of these two approaches to address the issue for devices in the wild. I'll also look into fixing the root cause in Pixel 2, plus notify the chipset vendor, and see about adding new CTS tests to ensure that future/upgrading devices are not afflicted by this problem.

78...@gmail.com <78...@gmail.com> #14May 26, 2016 05:12PM

This issue happens also to Samsung J7

co...@juanpujol.com <co...@juanpujol.com> #15May 27, 2016 02:31PM

Marking this as fixed now, because (1) this issue is addressed in Pixel 2 with Android P, (2) the vendor has been notified of the problem and has made the fix available for propagation, and (3) a future version of Android will enforce that this bug does not exist through CTS testing.

co...@juanpujol.com <co...@juanpujol.com> #16May 27, 2016 02:32PM

please, add user_ratings_total back.

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #17May 27, 2016 02:36PM

Please add user_ratings_total back to the API.

ch...@gmail.com <ch...@gmail.com> #18May 30, 2016 06:27AM

user_ratings_total is a very important field for users to determine if the rating is meaningful or not.

For instance - if provided two restaurants, one rated 4.7 by 2 people and another rated 4.6 by 200 people, which one will you want to give a try? Removing the user_ratings_total, two restaurants 4.7 vs 4.6, which one will you want to give a try then?

Without user_ratings_total, the rating itself simply loses its context. There no base that users can judge if the ratings is trustworthy at all.

So, please seriously consider adding the field back.

li...@cruncho.com <li...@cruncho.com> #20May 30, 2016 09:01PM

Another vote to bring back user_ratings_total. thank you

ar...@gmail.com <ar...@gmail.com> #21May 31, 2016 12:39PM

Another vote to bring back user_ratings_total. thank you

rs...@gmail.com <rs...@gmail.com> #22Jun 1, 2016 03:00PM

1 vote to bring it back

ch...@optiopublishing.com <ch...@optiopublishing.com> #23Jun 2, 2016 02:13PM

This has my vote.

op...@gmail.com <op...@gmail.com> #24Jun 2, 2016 02:55PM

Reinstate user_ratings_total, this totally has my vote

on...@gmail.com <on...@gmail.com> #25Jun 6, 2016 08:14PM

Gentlemen, seriously, please bring back user_ratings_total, my clients became unhappy, when it stopped working out of the blue recently

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #26Jun 6, 2016 08:16PM

Google is curiously silent

jm...@gmail.com <jm...@gmail.com> #27Jun 7, 2016 08:44AM

Another vote to bring back user_ratings_total. thank you

dp...@gmail.com <dp...@gmail.com> #28Jun 7, 2016 09:14AM

Please reinstate user_ratings_total field.

si...@googlemail.com <si...@googlemail.com> #29Jun 8, 2016 11:04AM

Another vote to bring back user_ratings_total. thank you

is...@gmail.com <is...@gmail.com> #30Jun 10, 2016 10:13PM

Another vote to bring back user_ratings_total. thank you

we...@gmail.com <we...@gmail.com> #31Jun 13, 2016 09:26PM

please bring user_ratings_total back

la...@reviewly.io <la...@reviewly.io> #32Jun 15, 2016 01:47PM

+1 to bring this back. Including this seems like a logical and necessary choice, as the rating data without the total review count data is essentially without value.

jo...@gmail.com <jo...@gmail.com> #33Jun 15, 2016 03:57PM

Since we can't get all reviews, at least we can have user_ratings_total. Thanks

ya...@gmail.com <ya...@gmail.com> #34Jun 19, 2016 03:05AM

Another vote to bring back user_ratings_total. thank you

na...@gmail.com <na...@gmail.com> #35Jun 26, 2016 01:53PM

Another vote to add back the user_ratings_total attribute to the API.

de...@gmail.com <de...@gmail.com> #36Jun 26, 2016 07:52PM

Please add back the user_ratings_total attribute to the API.

di...@gmail.com <di...@gmail.com> #37Jun 27, 2016 09:03AM

Please add user_ratings_total back

ad...@flrv.com <ad...@flrv.com> #38Jun 27, 2016 05:07PM

Removing this field broke our application Google feed for the 2nd time, thanks Google. We used to get rating and total review count from Google+ pages for businesses. Google removed that, which broke our feed from Google. We switched to using the Google Places API, and user_ratings_total. Then Google removes that as well, again breaking the feed from Google. We pull from 4 other sites, and never have this kind of feed breakage due to some change on their end.

Just as others, yet another vote to bring back user_ratings_total. Really does not make sense why Google would remove this and obscure the amount of reviews from third parties.

ro...@kittelcreations.com <ro...@kittelcreations.com> #39Jul 7, 2016 07:52PM

[Comment deleted]

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #40Jul 7, 2016 07:53PM

please bring back USER_RATINGS_TOTAL

ni...@urban-heroes.nl <ni...@urban-heroes.nl> #41Jul 11, 2016 09:24AM

Please add user_ratings_total back

di...@gmail.com <di...@gmail.com> #42Jul 16, 2016 12:02AM

The lack of user_ratings_total is crucially affecting the experience of our users since the field has been removed and no user add their places anymore as the total rating is not visible. Could someone confirm if this will be restored and if not what can we do on the API level to get such a number?

mi...@gmail.com <mi...@gmail.com> #43Aug 11, 2016 07:51AM

Another voice to add the user_ratings_total

u8...@gmail.com <u8...@gmail.com> #44Aug 19, 2016 11:20PM

Not sure why the user_ratings_total was removed, and would like to add it back

le...@reviewpush.com <le...@reviewpush.com> #45Aug 20, 2016 12:07AM

It doesn't seem like Google cares about this, sorry guys/gals.

na...@gmail.com <na...@gmail.com> #46Aug 21, 2016 12:40AM

I can't believe that this information is not available... wow google...

ji...@gmail.com <ji...@gmail.com> #47Aug 24, 2016 12:00AM

this is a must number for API

wi...@williampawson.com <wi...@williampawson.com> #48Sep 1, 2016 05:18PM

Bring back user_ratings_total!

cu...@gmail.com <cu...@gmail.com> #49Sep 2, 2016 01:55PM

really need this number for my academic research, please bring back user_ratings_total, t hank you.

ga...@gmail.com <ga...@gmail.com> #50Sep 6, 2016 03:23PM

+1 user_ratings_total
I don't get what the holdup is.
Google, please add review count, Yelp has one but I rather use Google Places API

https://www.yelp.com/developers/documentation/v2/search_api

Any verbal response from Google team member would be greatly appreciated on adding this feature

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #51Sep 6, 2016 05:06PM

Anyone have a phone number to call on this? I don't understand why there are so many requests and no action on adding these back to API data.

Did anyone call in and ask what the status is on it?

Thank you,
Alex

ad...@flrv.com <ad...@flrv.com> #52Sep 6, 2016 05:15PM

Call Google funny... They clearly do not seem to care. They removed it for a reason, not on accident. It seems to be missing from search as well. It only shows on maps now. I am sure Google is aware, and they seem to really not care. It seems they removed it as it was starting to be used and becoming known. Less than 6 months between comment about the undocumented property, to when it was removed.

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #53Sep 7, 2016 05:06PM

we really need it, bring it back please.

jr...@gmail.com <jr...@gmail.com> #54Oct 10, 2016 11:46AM

Is there any info on _why_ this figure isn't being included? Seems harmless but very useful - I'm certainly in need of it!

da...@gmail.com <da...@gmail.com> #55Oct 20, 2016 10:26PM

This info is very important. Please implement again.

io...@gmail.com <io...@gmail.com> #56Oct 25, 2016 03:28PM

this should be a must. We need it.

mu...@gmail.com <mu...@gmail.com> #57Nov 6, 2016 04:35PM

this is extremely required. Please can this be implemented asap.

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #58Nov 7, 2016 06:12PM

This issue opened for more than 5 years while other new ones already accepted so correct me if I'm wrong but it looks like that it's not going to be changed.

no...@gmail.com <no...@gmail.com> #59Nov 14, 2016 10:56PM

Kinda silly that this wasn't included in the API. Please add it.

se...@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com> #60Dec 8, 2016 03:44PM

[Comment deleted]

dw...@gmail.com <dw...@gmail.com> #61Dec 8, 2016 03:46PM

Please add this feature!

vi...@gmail.com <vi...@gmail.com> #62Dec 9, 2016 02:33PM

+1 for adding in user_ratings_total

ka...@servicemarket.com <ka...@servicemarket.com> #63Dec 13, 2016 06:46AM

+1 for adding in user_ratings_total, Please bring back user_ratings_total!

ma...@lovatomedia.com <ma...@lovatomedia.com> #64Dec 15, 2016 12:25AM

Please re-add this ASAP!!!!

ma...@lovatomedia.com <ma...@lovatomedia.com> #65Dec 15, 2016 01:33AM

[Comment deleted]

ma...@lovatomedia.com <ma...@lovatomedia.com> #66Dec 15, 2016 01:35AM

Couldn't agree more that the number of reviews is highly important in validating the weight of the overall rating. If I see a five-star overall and can't see the number of reviews behind it, I won't bother trusting it. Too bad for all the businesses who chose Google as their platform for collecting reviews.

ma...@lovatomedia.com <ma...@lovatomedia.com> #67Dec 15, 2016 01:37AM

Yes, +1 for re-adding ['result']['user_ratings_total']

ka...@gmail.com <ka...@gmail.com> #68Dec 16, 2016 04:48AM

[Comment deleted]

ka...@gmail.com <ka...@gmail.com> #69Dec 16, 2016 04:50AM

Another +1 me too vote to bring back user_ratings_total

al...@gmail.com <al...@gmail.com> #70Dec 21, 2016 12:19PM

Another vote to bring back user_ratings_total please.

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #71Dec 30, 2016 06:44PM

Another vote here.

mc...@smartvel.com <mc...@smartvel.com> #72Jan 2, 2017 02:29PM

Another vote here. Thanks.

bo...@gmail.com <bo...@gmail.com> #73Jan 3, 2017 09:29PM

Fix it , I will be happy !

a....@gmail.com <a....@gmail.com> #74Jan 9, 2017 06:12AM

Another vote here

he...@gmail.com <he...@gmail.com> #75Jan 11, 2017 08:59PM

Another vote here as well.

no...@gmail.com <no...@gmail.com> #76Jan 12, 2017 05:41PM

The lack of google team input on this issue (for/against/context/whatever) is frustrating considering that it's been asked for since 2012

ro...@gmail.com <ro...@gmail.com> #77Jan 12, 2017 07:46PM

Another vote here.

ni...@gmail.com <ni...@gmail.com> #78Jan 24, 2017 03:24AM

The total number of reviews seems like a no-brainer. Is there a reason it isn't currently included?

ga...@gmail.com <ga...@gmail.com> #79Feb 3, 2017 07:18AM

Another vote, I need this information to establish the precision of the rating!

ba...@gmail.com <ba...@gmail.com> #80Feb 3, 2017 05:00PM

Another vote. Please.

ni...@gmail.com <ni...@gmail.com> #81Feb 3, 2017 05:06PM

Yes, Google your users and customers need the number of reviews.

ro...@gmail.com <ro...@gmail.com> #82Feb 3, 2017 05:11PM

Another vote. Thank you.

ja...@gmail.com <ja...@gmail.com> #83Feb 3, 2017 05:30PM

Another vote. Please provide this valuable info for your customers.

ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #84Feb 3, 2017 06:21PM

Another vote here

ad...@flrv.com <ad...@flrv.com> #85Feb 3, 2017 07:49PM

[Comment deleted]

ad...@flrv.com <ad...@flrv.com> #86Feb 3, 2017 07:51PM

I do not think Google will ever bring this back. They are seeming to go a different direction. I cannot wait for Google to get their act together. I do not believe Google even cares. No matter how many voice bring it back, its gone and they do not care.

What should we do? Not rely on Google, but come up with other means as I did some time ago. Use your API Key to get a Google Map for a given location. Then use REGEX to scrape the page for the reviews. I have been doing this for a few months and its working fine. Till they change the format, and I will update my regex.

Here is my code in Java you can use similar REGEX in any language.

// Get the starts reviews
stars = Pattern.compile("\"],[0-9.]+,\"").matcher(line);
reviews = Pattern.compile("\"[0-9,.k]+ reviews\"").matcher(line);

// Filter out anything but numbers, decimal, k for thousands.
stars.group().replaceAll("[^0-9.]+","");
reviews.group().replaceAll("[^0-9.,k]+","");

Happy Friday! Thanks allot Google!!!!!

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #87Feb 9, 2017 08:30PM

The world needs this feature. Are you listening Google?

ya...@gmail.com <ya...@gmail.com> #88Feb 11, 2017 06:46AM

Another vote here. Thanks.

em...@gmail.com <em...@gmail.com> #89Feb 19, 2017 09:42PM

please add the total number of votes back in as it is an essential information to present it to the users when we are showing Google rating.

na...@gmail.com <na...@gmail.com> #90Feb 20, 2017 12:53PM

please bring it back. :)

je...@servusconnect.tech <je...@servusconnect.tech> #91Feb 28, 2017 01:59PM

please add this parameter back into the response

as...@gmail.com <as...@gmail.com> #92Mar 11, 2017 01:27PM

Yes we need user_ratings_total field. Please add back it dear Googlers.

al...@gmail.com <al...@gmail.com> #93Mar 16, 2017 03:21AM

Please add the total number of reviews! It will be very useful. Thanks in advance.

jo...@slatepeak.com <jo...@slatepeak.com> #94Mar 16, 2017 06:46PM

We would find the user_ratings_total field useful as well.

da...@gmail.com <da...@gmail.com> #95Mar 19, 2017 04:50PM

Please add user_ratings_total back.

hq...@gmail.com <hq...@gmail.com> #96Mar 21, 2017 10:48AM

Rating without ratingcount not valuable!

ge...@gmail.com <ge...@gmail.com> #97Apr 3, 2017 11:08AM

Another vote...

wa...@canfactory.com <wa...@canfactory.com> #98Apr 3, 2017 02:05PM

Another vote please.

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #99Apr 3, 2017 07:02PM

On the old system the status of this issue was 'accepted' and now it changed to 'new' is there any reason why ?

an...@google.com <an...@google.com> Apr 7, 2017 12:05PM

Assigned to fo...@google.com.

sa...@gmail.com <sa...@gmail.com> #100Apr 11, 2017 07:39AM

Is there any update on this? I hope this comes back real soon!! I need the total number of review to map the store performance, and plot a graph of number of new reviews each month

mu...@gmail.com <mu...@gmail.com> #101Apr 11, 2017 07:57AM

Comment has been deleted.

Message last modified on May 17, 2021 09:06AM

el...@gmail.com <el...@gmail.com> #102Apr 17, 2017 03:26PM

any update yet?? please make user_ratings_total back !!!

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #103Apr 17, 2017 07:43PM

This is absolutely needed for the API to be valuable to my company. Please bring it back 🙏

ko...@gmail.com <ko...@gmail.com> #104Apr 30, 2017 09:22PM

ro...@gmail.com <ro...@gmail.com> #105May 3, 2017 10:18AM

Please add this feature even it is not free!

ec...@gmail.com <ec...@gmail.com> #106May 4, 2017 06:41AM

I would like to be able to retrieve the total number of reviews a place has received.

mi...@gmail.com <mi...@gmail.com> #107May 6, 2017 06:43PM

Another vote here +1

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #108May 8, 2017 03:58PM

+1. Absolutely need this for the rating to be useful

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #109May 8, 2017 05:32PM

+1, really need to assert that the sample size is large enough for the rating to be trusted.

gu...@gmail.com <gu...@gmail.com> #110May 12, 2017 09:53PM

+1 need this so I can actually use the reviews api

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #111May 24, 2017 12:01AM

+1 Rating without count is not really valuable.

br...@gmail.com <br...@gmail.com> #112Jun 1, 2017 03:59PM

Number is very useful, please bring it back!

an...@gmail.com <an...@gmail.com> #113Jun 2, 2017 12:47PM

Totally should exist..

a....@prometheuscomputing.com <a....@prometheuscomputing.com> #114Jun 4, 2017 10:29PM

+1 Needed to determine if the rating is actually meaningful. Without it, can't tell if there are 5 ratings or 500.

kr...@gmail.com <kr...@gmail.com> #115Jun 12, 2017 03:02PM

The total number of ratings gives an idea about how accurate the meaning is so please add it back.

gn...@gmail.com <gn...@gmail.com> #116Jun 16, 2017 12:19PM

Please also include rating counts in nearby search results. Thanks!

st...@gmail.com <st...@gmail.com> #117Jun 18, 2017 06:29AM

sb...@gmail.com <sb...@gmail.com> #118Jun 19, 2017 06:48PM

Another vote. Thanks.

za...@shadow.com <za...@shadow.com> #119Jun 22, 2017 06:28AM

One more vote here. We all know the meaning of an average is heavily dependent on the size of population.

so...@flowsite.de <so...@flowsite.de> #120Jun 22, 2017 02:54PM

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #121Jun 27, 2017 04:16AM

th...@gmail.com <th...@gmail.com> #122Jul 7, 2017 07:29PM

da...@gmail.com <da...@gmail.com> #123Jul 7, 2017 07:30PM

lj...@gmail.com <lj...@gmail.com> #124Jul 8, 2017 12:55AM

jo...@highlevelmarketing.com <jo...@highlevelmarketing.com> #125Jul 12, 2017 12:43AM

ba...@gmail.com <ba...@gmail.com> #126Jul 13, 2017 05:06AM

zh...@gmail.com <zh...@gmail.com> #127Jul 13, 2017 04:52PM

pi...@gmail.com <pi...@gmail.com> #128Jul 19, 2017 08:12AM

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #129Jul 19, 2017 09:35AM

ha...@gmail.com <ha...@gmail.com> #130Jul 20, 2017 06:40PM

123123">

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #131Jul 25, 2017 05:08PM

an...@gmail.com <an...@gmail.com> #132Aug 4, 2017 05:27AM

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #133Aug 4, 2017 08:15AM

si...@gmail.com <si...@gmail.com> #134Aug 4, 2017 09:41AM

jo...@opentimeapp.com <jo...@opentimeapp.com> #135Aug 10, 2017 03:02AM

da...@gmail.com <da...@gmail.com> #136Aug 10, 2017 01:19PM

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #137Aug 10, 2017 11:15PM

ch...@gmail.com <ch...@gmail.com> #138Aug 15, 2017 07:07AM

+1

This would be really helpful for my program.

se...@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com> #139Aug 31, 2017 12:07PM

+1 Please, mercy.

mo...@gmail.com <mo...@gmail.com> #140Aug 31, 2017 08:50PM

+1 ... or force us to screen scrape

al...@gmail.com <al...@gmail.com> #141Sep 6, 2017 02:37PM

he...@gmail.com <he...@gmail.com> #142Sep 14, 2017 07:04AM

No more about this thank

ge...@gmail.com <ge...@gmail.com> #143Sep 19, 2017 06:15PM

yes Please!!!

ja...@loopwhole.co.uk <ja...@loopwhole.co.uk> #144Sep 26, 2017 11:50AM

mj...@gmail.com <mj...@gmail.com> #145Sep 26, 2017 01:17PM

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #146Sep 26, 2017 05:04PM

dy...@gmail.com <dy...@gmail.com> #147Sep 27, 2017 06:50PM

+1!!!

di...@gmail.com <di...@gmail.com> #148Oct 5, 2017 09:56PM

sv...@gmail.com <sv...@gmail.com> #149Oct 9, 2017 08:56AM

+1 vote to bring this back

fa...@gmail.com <fa...@gmail.com> #150Oct 15, 2017 05:03PM

This is a radical decision, please get `user_ratings_total` back!

ka...@gmail.com <ka...@gmail.com> #151Oct 16, 2017 09:09AM

+1, Just came to know about it. It was desired field for places api.

ka...@gmail.com <ka...@gmail.com> #152Oct 16, 2017 09:12AM

Come On this ticket is from 2011, If they don't want to put it back. Just clear us out.
I doubt if assignee is alive till this much time ?

lo...@gmail.com <lo...@gmail.com> #153Oct 16, 2017 09:13AM

+1 for this.

gu...@gmail.com <gu...@gmail.com> #154Oct 19, 2017 07:28PM

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #155Oct 19, 2017 07:30PM

ce...@gmail.com <ce...@gmail.com> #156Oct 23, 2017 10:20PM

ta...@gmail.com <ta...@gmail.com> #157Oct 24, 2017 03:48PM

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #158Nov 13, 2017 10:20PM

+1 !!!

ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #159Nov 26, 2017 08:00PM

+1. Would be very useful!

fo...@google.com <fo...@google.com> #160Dec 5, 2017 09:32PM

Reassigned to ka...@google.com.

Moving PlacesAPI bugs to new PM

nd...@gmail.com <nd...@gmail.com> #161Dec 6, 2017 05:22AM

di...@gmail.com <di...@gmail.com> #162Dec 9, 2017 01:10PM

+1 Are you afraid?

fc...@gmail.com <fc...@gmail.com> #163Dec 12, 2017 11:55AM

+1 how many years are needed to fix this, please

du...@gmail.com <du...@gmail.com> #164Dec 12, 2017 12:05PM

ka...@gmail.com <ka...@gmail.com> #165Dec 12, 2017 12:15PM

Don't know why Google hiring dead people for issues settlement ? @Assignee, you should update this issue stream.

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #166Dec 12, 2017 05:38PM

This issue opened on 2011, doesn't look that it's gonna changed.

go...@vixinet.ch <go...@vixinet.ch> #167Dec 14, 2017 05:21PM

same here

fa...@gmail.com <fa...@gmail.com> #168Dec 14, 2017 05:23PM

Please click the "star" icon at the top to indicate that you are affected by this issue!

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #169Jan 9, 2018 02:52PM

Please bring back the number of reviews, it gives a feeling of how real the rating is and is rather important measure to be omitted

ia...@theiconic.com.au <ia...@theiconic.com.au> #170Jan 9, 2018 11:23PM

Please add #reviews back, it is very useful

kc...@gmail.com <kc...@gmail.com> #171Jan 12, 2018 03:07PM

Please add the review count back,I don't know why it needs to be hidden. It is so essential.

ra...@gmail.com <ra...@gmail.com> #172Feb 2, 2018 04:28PM

+1 on bringing number of reviews back!

a....@prointernet.de <a....@prointernet.de> #173Feb 8, 2018 03:03PM

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #174Feb 13, 2018 01:38AM

ak...@gmail.com <ak...@gmail.com> #175Feb 15, 2018 11:12AM

fa...@gmail.com <fa...@gmail.com> #176Feb 20, 2018 08:55PM

we...@gmail.com <we...@gmail.com> #177Feb 21, 2018 08:55AM

zu...@gmail.com <zu...@gmail.com> #178Feb 21, 2018 10:59PM

+1. It is a must to be in the API

el...@justeattakeaway.com <el...@justeattakeaway.com> #179Feb 26, 2018 06:41PM

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #180Mar 1, 2018 02:27PM

pa...@corp.bug-software.com <pa...@corp.bug-software.com> #181Mar 3, 2018 02:48PM

fa...@apsl.net <fa...@apsl.net> #182Mar 8, 2018 01:45PM

mo...@gmail.com <mo...@gmail.com> #183Mar 9, 2018 05:23PM

ad...@gmail.com <ad...@gmail.com> #184Mar 18, 2018 12:44PM

ja...@gmail.com <ja...@gmail.com> #185Mar 18, 2018 10:08PM

+1 Rating isn't very useful without a count to go with it for making programmatic decisions.

we...@gmail.com <we...@gmail.com> #186Mar 29, 2018 08:56AM

mo...@gmail.com <mo...@gmail.com> #187Mar 30, 2018 01:39AM

+1 Would be a great add to the API. I dont see a good reason not to have that feature.

da...@gmail.com <da...@gmail.com> #188Mar 30, 2018 01:40AM

+1 Would be a great add to the API. Really need this feature Please!

jn...@gmail.com <jn...@gmail.com> #189Mar 30, 2018 06:30PM

+1 It would be very useful!

an...@gmail.com <an...@gmail.com> #190Apr 12, 2018 01:08PM

Would love to have this feature too... though it's looking futile.

la...@gmail.com <la...@gmail.com> #191Apr 12, 2018 08:45PM

+1 for me too.

ch...@gmail.com <ch...@gmail.com> #192Apr 22, 2018 01:10PM

az...@gmail.com <az...@gmail.com> #193Apr 29, 2018 01:44PM

da...@gmail.com <da...@gmail.com> #194Apr 30, 2018 06:54AM

+1 !!!

pb...@gmail.com <pb...@gmail.com> #195May 2, 2018 12:30PM

+1. Please add the total review count in the place details.

jo...@appoly.co.uk <jo...@appoly.co.uk> #196May 14, 2018 01:23PM

da...@cairntek.com <da...@cairntek.com> #197May 15, 2018 10:27PM

We need this for goodness sake!

jo...@gmail.com <jo...@gmail.com> #198May 22, 2018 02:03AM

+1. Or confirm that you won't be re-instating feature in the future. Ridiculous that you won't confirm either way! Without the number of reviews, the ratings is statistically useless.

jo...@gmail.com <jo...@gmail.com> #199May 23, 2018 06:29AM

am...@gmail.com <am...@gmail.com> #200May 23, 2018 11:12AM

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #201May 24, 2018 12:58AM

il...@gmail.com <il...@gmail.com> #202May 31, 2018 12:45PM

em...@gmail.com <em...@gmail.com> #203Jun 5, 2018 02:23AM

pi...@gmail.com <pi...@gmail.com> #204Jun 6, 2018 08:48AM

fm...@meilleurecopro.com <fm...@meilleurecopro.com> #205Jun 13, 2018 07:21AM

st...@gmail.com <st...@gmail.com> #206Jun 14, 2018 11:14PM

Please make a total number of reviews available.

th...@gmail.com <th...@gmail.com> #207Jun 17, 2018 07:08AM

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #208Jun 19, 2018 06:23PM

I agree that
"Without the number of reviews, the ratings is statistically useless"

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #209Jun 19, 2018 07:08PM

ca...@gmail.com <ca...@gmail.com> #210Jun 27, 2018 12:04PM

2011 -- >2018 pfuuu !!!
please bring back something like ---> user_ratings_total

ev...@gmail.com <ev...@gmail.com> #211Jul 11, 2018 02:39PM

br...@influencenetwork.com <br...@influencenetwork.com> #212Jul 13, 2018 02:39PM

Now that Google is planning on charging for the use of this Places API it is imperative that the API contains the data needed to make it fully useful.

de...@gmail.com <de...@gmail.com> #213Jul 17, 2018 06:34PM

+1 Come on, issue is open for 5 years!

sa...@gmail.com <sa...@gmail.com> #214Jul 22, 2018 05:42AM

+1 if there is a differentarate plan to get this information then it should be introduced.

sa...@kwilia.nl <sa...@kwilia.nl> #215Jul 27, 2018 10:31AM

dw...@unifieddata.ai <dw...@unifieddata.ai> #216Jul 27, 2018 01:37PM

we...@gmail.com <we...@gmail.com> #217Jul 31, 2018 04:08PM

+1 please. Even an approximation would be helpful.

Message last modified on Jul 31, 2018 04:09PM

sp...@gmail.com <sp...@gmail.com> #218Aug 1, 2018 06:03PM

ka...@google.com <ka...@google.com> #219Aug 6, 2018 06:47PM

Reassigned to iv...@google.com.

Assigning to new Places PM

ed...@gmail.com <ed...@gmail.com> #220Aug 16, 2018 01:59PM

le...@reviewpush.com <le...@reviewpush.com> #221Aug 16, 2018 04:37PM

Any update on this?

nf...@gmail.com <nf...@gmail.com> #222Aug 17, 2018 01:56PM

ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #223Aug 18, 2018 12:34PM

+1 for reinstating user_ratings_total for all the reasons cited

wf...@gmail.com <wf...@gmail.com> #224Aug 21, 2018 08:26AM

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #225Aug 21, 2018 09:28PM

ge...@gmail.com <ge...@gmail.com> #226Aug 22, 2018 03:10AM

😔 they don't care about us.

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #227Aug 22, 2018 10:08PM

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #228Aug 30, 2018 10:14AM

th...@gmail.com <th...@gmail.com> #229Aug 31, 2018 07:59PM

ab...@gmail.com <ab...@gmail.com> #230Sep 2, 2018 06:03AM

+1 , please add this feature

ro...@googlemail.com <ro...@googlemail.com> #231Sep 2, 2018 05:23PM

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #232Sep 3, 2018 12:57PM

su...@gmail.com <su...@gmail.com> #233Sep 3, 2018 02:41PM

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #234Sep 6, 2018 10:12AM

al...@gmail.com <al...@gmail.com> #235Sep 7, 2018 05:48PM

go...@biradix.com <go...@biradix.com> #236Sep 7, 2018 05:49PM

sa...@gmail.com <sa...@gmail.com> #237Sep 13, 2018 08:57AM

There is a heavy requirement to show the overall rating of an organization (total no of reviews count) , please add this feature back.

ha...@gmail.com <ha...@gmail.com> #238Sep 13, 2018 02:00PM

hu...@qudra-tech.com <hu...@qudra-tech.com> #239Sep 13, 2018 03:19PM

he...@gmail.com <he...@gmail.com> #240Sep 14, 2018 04:39PM

ds...@gmail.com <ds...@gmail.com> #241Sep 16, 2018 11:33AM

Sad that there is not a single answer from a google employee.

vi...@gmail.com <vi...@gmail.com> #242Sep 24, 2018 03:09AM

^^^ What everyone said. Would be nice to have back.

ol...@gmail.com <ol...@gmail.com> #243Sep 25, 2018 02:09PM

+1 here... wow, no fix since 2011!?!?

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #244Sep 27, 2018 02:56PM

Please?

mo...@gmail.com <mo...@gmail.com> #245Oct 18, 2018 08:16PM

Why is it an intended behavior to remove the total reviews count?

cr...@ayenda.co <cr...@ayenda.co> #246Oct 19, 2018 09:22PM

+1 I don't understand why you don't fix something as simple as adding a key for that API ? We really need it guys

an...@gmail.com <an...@gmail.com> #247Oct 19, 2018 09:24PM

+1 When are you going to add it guys ? We need that key

li...@foodboss.com <li...@foodboss.com> #248Oct 22, 2018 03:13PM

Guys, if you're still wondering about this, I don't think we'll be getting this from Google.

They easily could have addressed it by now. They're never gonna do it because then people could scrape their business info and list star ratings on their own site with the "Out of 46 Reviews" qualifier and come across like they collected those reviews themselves.

ma...@rockingdata.co <ma...@rockingdata.co> #249Oct 29, 2018 12:01PM

in...@gmail.com <in...@gmail.com> #250Nov 27, 2018 03:43PM

+1 still in 2018.

qo...@gmail.com <qo...@gmail.com> #251Nov 28, 2018 03:04PM

+1. Get an impression of a 2.5 average rating based on two unlucky clients or a 4.5 average rating based on reviews from a friend and an uncle does not create a good overview. 4.5 average rating based on 260 reviews shows that you have worked for it. This is hopeless!

ch...@gmail.com <ch...@gmail.com> #252Nov 28, 2018 03:19PM

Average rating without knowing the total amount of ratings is pretty worthless. Please get the amount of rating back in your API. It is better for consumers and the serious businesses out there. Thanks

Ex: 5 ratings - avrage 4.9 -
300 ratings avrage 4.9

Who would you choose??

This is important for consumers to get proper guidance. Thanks

ba...@gmail.com <ba...@gmail.com> #253Dec 4, 2018 11:22AM

ti...@gmail.com <ti...@gmail.com> #254Dec 5, 2018 05:49PM

ca...@gmail.com <ca...@gmail.com> #255Dec 12, 2018 09:26PM

ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #256Dec 23, 2018 04:18PM

tm...@gmail.com <tm...@gmail.com> #257Dec 27, 2018 02:25PM

go...@gmail.com <go...@gmail.com> #258Jan 7, 2019 11:02AM

+1... Have had such thoughts for several years.

ch...@gmail.com <ch...@gmail.com> #259Jan 9, 2019 05:44AM

gs...@gmail.com <gs...@gmail.com> #260Jan 9, 2019 01:24PM

ha...@gmail.com <ha...@gmail.com> #261Jan 15, 2019 01:28PM

jh...@gmail.com <jh...@gmail.com> #262Jan 17, 2019 02:41PM

cr...@gmail.com <cr...@gmail.com> #263Jan 17, 2019 03:08PM

ph...@gmail.com <ph...@gmail.com> #264Jan 17, 2019 11:56PM

+1...This is incredibly useful and super easy to add, so there must be some reason they don't want to add it :(

ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #265Jan 31, 2019 04:52PM

de...@gmail.com <de...@gmail.com> #266Feb 13, 2019 10:26AM

mp...@googlemail.com <mp...@googlemail.com> #267Feb 15, 2019 09:32AM

tm...@gmail.com <tm...@gmail.com> #268Feb 26, 2019 08:58AM

+1 to this reply:

"Average rating without knowing the total amount of ratings is pretty worthless. Please get the amount of rating back in your API. It is better for consumers and the serious businesses out there. Thanks

Ex: 5 ratings - avrage 4.9 -
300 ratings avrage 4.9

Who would you choose??

This is important for consumers to get proper guidance. Thanks"

ba...@trimetron.com <ba...@trimetron.com> #269Feb 26, 2019 12:52PM

ta...@gmail.com <ta...@gmail.com> #270Feb 27, 2019 10:38AM

mi...@google.com <mi...@google.com> #271Mar 7, 2019 02:16PM

Marked as fixed.

The total amount of ratings is now generally available for all Places API clients as part of the SKU: Atmosphere Data.

Places API: user_ratings_total
Places API (New): userRatingCount
Places SDK for Android: Place.Field.USER_RATING_COUNT
Places SDK for iOS: GMSPlaceFieldUserRatingsTotal

Please refer to the following documentation:

Message last modified on Nov 11, 2024 03:08PM

ha...@gmail.com <ha...@gmail.com> #272Mar 13, 2019 03:37PM

---

Message last modified on Mar 13, 2019 07:45PM

ma...@googlemail.com <ma...@googlemail.com> #273Mar 20, 2019 02:29PM

Wow. I'm lucky, I needed this feature today and see that the request has been ongoing since 2011(!!) but it does indeed work now. Thanks.

string requestUrl = $"{baseUrl}?key={apiKey}&placeid={placeID}&fields=rating,reviews,user_ratings_total";

en...@chargedelectrical.co.uk <en...@chargedelectrical.co.uk> #274Mar 24, 2019 02:22PM

My review counter is incorrect

mi...@google.com <mi...@google.com> #275Apr 12, 2019 08:23AM

UPDATE // CORRECTION

The "user_ratings_total" field in only available as part of the Atmosphere SKU (not Basic).

This means that requests for Place Details including "user_ratings_total" in the "fields" parameter are always billed as Atmosphere rather than Basic.

There was an error in our documentation (and

#comment271

above) which may have resulted in overcharging for some of your API projects. Requests that include "user_ratings_total" in the "fields" parameter but no other Atmosphere fields would be expected to be billed as Basic, while they are in fact billed as Atmosphere.

We are working on identifying affected API projects and issuing appropriate refunds. The refund period is yet to be established, taking into account that it takes time to have client applications updated. There is no need to contact Support at this time, we will keep you posted here.

The "user_ratings_total" field is now under the "SKU: Atmosphere Data" section:

https://developers.google.com/places/web-service/usage-and-billing

https://developers.google.com/places/ios-sdk/usage-and-billing

https://developers.google.com/places/android-sdk/usage-and-billing

The same will soon be reflected in the Places API documentation:

https://developers.google.com/places/web-service/details#fields

https://developers.google.com/places/web-service/place-data-fields#basic

Apologies for the inconvenience and thank you for your patience!

jb...@gmail.com <jb...@gmail.com> #276Jul 26, 2019 05:58PM

For us non programmers, how do you sort places with most numbet of reviews using google maps app on mobile?

co...@gmail.com <co...@gmail.com> #277Dec 12, 2019 09:34PM

I'd also like to know, is there some way I can find the businesses in a city with the highest number of Google reviews?

Message last modified on Dec 12, 2019 09:35PM

mu...@gmail.com <mu...@gmail.com> #278Jun 15, 2020 04:48PM

ka...@gmail.com <ka...@gmail.com> #279Jun 26, 2020 06:19AM

ar...@gmail.com <ar...@gmail.com> #280Sep 10, 2020 04:55AM

be...@gmail.com <be...@gmail.com> #281Sep 10, 2020 08:04PM

he...@google.com <he...@google.com> #282Sep 11, 2020 09:17AM

For the recent +1s, if they are for #comment276 or #comment277, since that's a different feature please file a new issue[1] instead or a case[2] if you might need some 1:1 assistance.

Otherwise, please note this feature request has been implemented.

[1]https://developers.google.com/maps/support#issue_tracker [2]https://developers.google.com/maps/support#creating-a-support-case

Message last modified on Sep 11, 2020 09:17AM

el...@gmail.com <el...@gmail.com> #283Sep 11, 2020 04:21PM

+1000000

ve...@gmail.com <ve...@gmail.com> #284Jan 8, 2021 07:18PM

+1000000000000

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #285Jan 9, 2021 11:33AM

fr...@gmail.com <fr...@gmail.com> #286Feb 10, 2021 06:03AM

sa...@gmail.com <sa...@gmail.com> #287May 8, 2021 02:47PM

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #288May 14, 2021 10:38AM

ky...@gmail.com <ky...@gmail.com> #289Jun 7, 2021 11:31PM

kh...@gmail.com <kh...@gmail.com> #290Jun 22, 2021 07:10AM

i8...@gmail.com <i8...@gmail.com> #291Sep 1, 2021 02:32AM

re...@gmail.com <re...@gmail.com> #292Sep 2, 2021 09:30AM

al...@gmail.com <al...@gmail.com> #293Sep 19, 2021 08:15AM

a feature to sort results on google map by number of reviews (review count) will definitely be helpful.

to...@gmail.com <to...@gmail.com> #294Oct 30, 2021 06:13AM

fe...@gmail.com <fe...@gmail.com> #295Jan 11, 2022 09:52AM

da...@gmail.com <da...@gmail.com> #296Jan 11, 2022 08:43PM

da...@gmail.com <da...@gmail.com> #297Jan 11, 2022 08:45PM

11 years and still jaja.. I should put my CV in google for his api develop.

aj...@gmail.com <aj...@gmail.com> #298Feb 1, 2022 09:55AM

sa...@gmail.com <sa...@gmail.com> #299Mar 22, 2022 12:17PM

ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #300Mar 25, 2022 01:41AM

mr...@gmail.com <mr...@gmail.com> #301Jun 20, 2022 03:33PM

da...@gmail.com <da...@gmail.com> #302Aug 8, 2022 11:39PM

+1 Get on it Google

ml...@gmail.com <ml...@gmail.com> #303Aug 18, 2022 04:07PM

please add it back :(

iv...@google.com <iv...@google.com> Aug 18, 2022 04:09PM

Reassigned to gm...@google.com.

ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #304Sep 4, 2022 10:16PM

Come on guys - we want this filter :)

so...@gmail.com <so...@gmail.com> #305Sep 13, 2022 05:55PM

Shame that this simple filter cannot be implemented.

kh...@gmail.com <kh...@gmail.com> #306Jan 15, 2023 01:01PM

Surprising that such a simple but useful thing is not being worked on

pk...@gmail.com <pk...@gmail.com> #307Feb 5, 2023 02:09PM

Really? Why not? This seems so easy to implement.

mi...@gmail.com <mi...@gmail.com> #308Feb 18, 2023 11:46PM

A much needed feature!

pr...@gmail.com <pr...@gmail.com> #309Apr 9, 2023 01:38PM

It is truly needed feature. Why is google not paying any attention to this issue.

na...@gmail.com <na...@gmail.com> #310May 10, 2023 05:10AM

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #311May 18, 2023 07:04PM

du...@gmail.com <du...@gmail.com> #312Jul 3, 2023 03:23PM

Still waiting for this feature.

fe...@gmail.com <fe...@gmail.com> #313Jul 6, 2024 12:34PM

I was able to use a beta version of the filter based on number of reviewers feature on my google maps around early 2024 but taken away from me 2 days ago. Not everyone I know had it though, some did and some didn’t. It was definitely very useful for getting good service and quality restos.

89...@gmail.com <89...@gmail.com> #314Nov 10, 2024 07:21PM

Still waiting as well. Not sure why the status is "Fixed". It's not done yet.

mi...@google.com <mi...@google.com> #315Nov 11, 2024 03:16PM

In response to all comments since June 2019, please read comment #271 (updated to reflect #275) and comment #282.

This was a feature request only for the Places API to expose the total count of user ratings (number of reviews) for a single place.

There is no plan to implement a feature to sort results by number of reviews in the Places API. If that feature is desired in the Places API, please file a new feature request.

Otherwise, please note that this is a place to report and track issues and feature requests only with the Google Maps APIs.

Please refer to the Google Maps Help Community for issues and feature requests with the Google Maps web and mobile applications.

Issue 35820858

Description

Issue summary

Comments

th...@google.com <th...@google.com> Jul 31, 2012 02:55AM

le...@hookedmedia.net <le...@hookedmedia.net> #3Apr 5, 2013 01:12AM

lu...@google.com <lu...@google.com> Jun 4, 2013 06:50AM

ya...@gmail.com <ya...@gmail.com> #4Mar 25, 2014 08:45AM

ev...@gmail.com <ev...@gmail.com> #6Dec 3, 2015 07:38PM

er...@fosterinteractive.com <er...@fosterinteractive.com> #7May 25, 2016 03:44PM

ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #8May 25, 2016 09:20PM

ev...@gmail.com <ev...@gmail.com> #9May 26, 2016 02:36AM

no...@udr.com <no...@udr.com> #10May 26, 2016 01:38PM

og...@gmail.com <og...@gmail.com> #11May 26, 2016 01:40PM

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #12May 26, 2016 01:59PM

ch...@gmail.com <ch...@gmail.com> #13May 26, 2016 04:27PM

78...@gmail.com <78...@gmail.com> #14May 26, 2016 05:12PM

co...@juanpujol.com <co...@juanpujol.com> #15May 27, 2016 02:31PM

co...@juanpujol.com <co...@juanpujol.com> #16May 27, 2016 02:32PM

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #17May 27, 2016 02:36PM

ch...@gmail.com <ch...@gmail.com> #18May 30, 2016 06:27AM

li...@cruncho.com <li...@cruncho.com> #20May 30, 2016 09:01PM

ar...@gmail.com <ar...@gmail.com> #21May 31, 2016 12:39PM

rs...@gmail.com <rs...@gmail.com> #22Jun 1, 2016 03:00PM

ch...@optiopublishing.com <ch...@optiopublishing.com> #23Jun 2, 2016 02:13PM

op...@gmail.com <op...@gmail.com> #24Jun 2, 2016 02:55PM

on...@gmail.com <on...@gmail.com> #25Jun 6, 2016 08:14PM

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #26Jun 6, 2016 08:16PM

jm...@gmail.com <jm...@gmail.com> #27Jun 7, 2016 08:44AM

dp...@gmail.com <dp...@gmail.com> #28Jun 7, 2016 09:14AM

si...@googlemail.com <si...@googlemail.com> #29Jun 8, 2016 11:04AM

is...@gmail.com <is...@gmail.com> #30Jun 10, 2016 10:13PM

we...@gmail.com <we...@gmail.com> #31Jun 13, 2016 09:26PM

la...@reviewly.io <la...@reviewly.io> #32Jun 15, 2016 01:47PM

jo...@gmail.com <jo...@gmail.com> #33Jun 15, 2016 03:57PM

ya...@gmail.com <ya...@gmail.com> #34Jun 19, 2016 03:05AM

na...@gmail.com <na...@gmail.com> #35Jun 26, 2016 01:53PM

de...@gmail.com <de...@gmail.com> #36Jun 26, 2016 07:52PM

di...@gmail.com <di...@gmail.com> #37Jun 27, 2016 09:03AM

ad...@flrv.com <ad...@flrv.com> #38Jun 27, 2016 05:07PM

ro...@kittelcreations.com <ro...@kittelcreations.com> #39Jul 7, 2016 07:52PM

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #40Jul 7, 2016 07:53PM

ni...@urban-heroes.nl <ni...@urban-heroes.nl> #41Jul 11, 2016 09:24AM

di...@gmail.com <di...@gmail.com> #42Jul 16, 2016 12:02AM

mi...@gmail.com <mi...@gmail.com> #43Aug 11, 2016 07:51AM

u8...@gmail.com <u8...@gmail.com> #44Aug 19, 2016 11:20PM

le...@reviewpush.com <le...@reviewpush.com> #45Aug 20, 2016 12:07AM

na...@gmail.com <na...@gmail.com> #46Aug 21, 2016 12:40AM

ji...@gmail.com <ji...@gmail.com> #47Aug 24, 2016 12:00AM

wi...@williampawson.com <wi...@williampawson.com> #48Sep 1, 2016 05:18PM

cu...@gmail.com <cu...@gmail.com> #49Sep 2, 2016 01:55PM

ga...@gmail.com <ga...@gmail.com> #50Sep 6, 2016 03:23PM

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #51Sep 6, 2016 05:06PM

ad...@flrv.com <ad...@flrv.com> #52Sep 6, 2016 05:15PM

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #53Sep 7, 2016 05:06PM

jr...@gmail.com <jr...@gmail.com> #54Oct 10, 2016 11:46AM

da...@gmail.com <da...@gmail.com> #55Oct 20, 2016 10:26PM

io...@gmail.com <io...@gmail.com> #56Oct 25, 2016 03:28PM

mu...@gmail.com <mu...@gmail.com> #57Nov 6, 2016 04:35PM

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #58Nov 7, 2016 06:12PM

no...@gmail.com <no...@gmail.com> #59Nov 14, 2016 10:56PM

se...@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com> #60Dec 8, 2016 03:44PM

dw...@gmail.com <dw...@gmail.com> #61Dec 8, 2016 03:46PM

vi...@gmail.com <vi...@gmail.com> #62Dec 9, 2016 02:33PM

ka...@servicemarket.com <ka...@servicemarket.com> #63Dec 13, 2016 06:46AM

ma...@lovatomedia.com <ma...@lovatomedia.com> #64Dec 15, 2016 12:25AM

ma...@lovatomedia.com <ma...@lovatomedia.com> #65Dec 15, 2016 01:33AM

ma...@lovatomedia.com <ma...@lovatomedia.com> #66Dec 15, 2016 01:35AM

ma...@lovatomedia.com <ma...@lovatomedia.com> #67Dec 15, 2016 01:37AM

ka...@gmail.com <ka...@gmail.com> #68Dec 16, 2016 04:48AM

ka...@gmail.com <ka...@gmail.com> #69Dec 16, 2016 04:50AM

al...@gmail.com <al...@gmail.com> #70Dec 21, 2016 12:19PM

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #71Dec 30, 2016 06:44PM

mc...@smartvel.com <mc...@smartvel.com> #72Jan 2, 2017 02:29PM

bo...@gmail.com <bo...@gmail.com> #73Jan 3, 2017 09:29PM

a....@gmail.com <a....@gmail.com> #74Jan 9, 2017 06:12AM

he...@gmail.com <he...@gmail.com> #75Jan 11, 2017 08:59PM

no...@gmail.com <no...@gmail.com> #76Jan 12, 2017 05:41PM

ro...@gmail.com <ro...@gmail.com> #77Jan 12, 2017 07:46PM

ni...@gmail.com <ni...@gmail.com> #78Jan 24, 2017 03:24AM