Status Update
Comments
an...@gmail.com <an...@gmail.com> #2
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit ae09f6e6686b32c5677c086d51d5737553e2aeb9
Author: Ian Lake <ilake@google.com>
Date: Mon Jul 27 17:51:04 2020
Ensure open() and close() always work
As per the Javadoc on LOCK_MODE_LOCKED_CLOSED
and LOCK_MODE_LOCKED_OPEN, the app should
still be able to open() and close() the drawer
programmatically.
This change aligns open() and close() with
openDrawer() and closeDrawer() to allow
programmatic usage no matter what LOCK_MODE
is used.
Test: tested in sample app
BUG: 162253907
Change-Id: I74f2f7ea5ff8ce06bfcfeff09aedd980f385ffc7
M drawerlayout/drawerlayout/src/main/java/androidx/drawerlayout/widget/DrawerLayout.java
ra...@google.com <ra...@google.com>
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #3
We've fixed this internally and are preparing a DrawerLayout 1.1.1
release with this fix.
gh...@google.com <gh...@google.com> #4
Branch: snap-temp-L48600000649720827
commit 6e863d72d89137a408907be4c44f5444b51f8dab
Author: Ian Lake <ilake@google.com>
Date: Mon Jul 27 17:51:04 2020
Ensure open() and close() always work
As per the Javadoc on LOCK_MODE_LOCKED_CLOSED
and LOCK_MODE_LOCKED_OPEN, the app should
still be able to open() and close() the drawer
programmatically.
This change aligns open() and close() with
openDrawer() and closeDrawer() to allow
programmatic usage no matter what LOCK_MODE
is used.
Test: tested in sample app
BUG: 162253907
Change-Id: I74f2f7ea5ff8ce06bfcfeff09aedd980f385ffc7
(cherry picked from commit ae09f6e6686b32c5677c086d51d5737553e2aeb9)
M drawerlayout/drawerlayout/src/main/java/androidx/drawerlayout/widget/DrawerLayout.java
an...@gmail.com <an...@gmail.com> #5
Branch: snap-temp-L11100000649726887
commit 4b1419f8d1c41233b1af357a178c1eb6e71e3fb0
Author: Ian Lake <ilake@google.com>
Date: Mon Jul 27 17:51:04 2020
Ensure open() and close() always work
As per the Javadoc on LOCK_MODE_LOCKED_CLOSED
and LOCK_MODE_LOCKED_OPEN, the app should
still be able to open() and close() the drawer
programmatically.
This change aligns open() and close() with
openDrawer() and closeDrawer() to allow
programmatic usage no matter what LOCK_MODE
is used.
Test: tested in sample app
BUG: 162253907
Change-Id: I74f2f7ea5ff8ce06bfcfeff09aedd980f385ffc7
(cherry picked from commit ae09f6e6686b32c5677c086d51d5737553e2aeb9)
M drawerlayout/drawerlayout/src/main/java/androidx/drawerlayout/widget/DrawerLayout.java
tn...@google.com <tn...@google.com> #6
Branch: snap-temp-L37200000649809909
commit 8e12fa9761f7d1ad254bd278392ed2020de2cec1
Author: Ian Lake <ilake@google.com>
Date: Mon Jul 27 17:51:04 2020
Ensure open() and close() always work
As per the Javadoc on LOCK_MODE_LOCKED_CLOSED
and LOCK_MODE_LOCKED_OPEN, the app should
still be able to open() and close() the drawer
programmatically.
This change aligns open() and close() with
openDrawer() and closeDrawer() to allow
programmatic usage no matter what LOCK_MODE
is used.
Test: tested in sample app
BUG: 162253907
Change-Id: I74f2f7ea5ff8ce06bfcfeff09aedd980f385ffc7
(cherry picked from commit ae09f6e6686b32c5677c086d51d5737553e2aeb9)
M drawerlayout/drawerlayout/src/main/java/androidx/drawerlayout/widget/DrawerLayout.java
an...@gmail.com <an...@gmail.com> #7
Branch: snap-temp-L59700000649811929
commit 8c0814d1467e02e617f002b61b09a5737a3a1e94
Author: Ian Lake <ilake@google.com>
Date: Mon Jul 27 17:51:04 2020
Ensure open() and close() always work
As per the Javadoc on LOCK_MODE_LOCKED_CLOSED
and LOCK_MODE_LOCKED_OPEN, the app should
still be able to open() and close() the drawer
programmatically.
This change aligns open() and close() with
openDrawer() and closeDrawer() to allow
programmatic usage no matter what LOCK_MODE
is used.
Test: tested in sample app
BUG: 162253907
Change-Id: I74f2f7ea5ff8ce06bfcfeff09aedd980f385ffc7
(cherry picked from commit ae09f6e6686b32c5677c086d51d5737553e2aeb9)
M drawerlayout/drawerlayout/src/main/java/androidx/drawerlayout/widget/DrawerLayout.java
an...@gmail.com <an...@gmail.com> #8
Branch: snap-temp-L27600000649911717
commit 63fcaff3662ea1236d84e644362f35b7618b56dd
Author: Ian Lake <ilake@google.com>
Date: Mon Jul 27 17:51:04 2020
Ensure open() and close() always work
As per the Javadoc on LOCK_MODE_LOCKED_CLOSED
and LOCK_MODE_LOCKED_OPEN, the app should
still be able to open() and close() the drawer
programmatically.
This change aligns open() and close() with
openDrawer() and closeDrawer() to allow
programmatic usage no matter what LOCK_MODE
is used.
Test: tested in sample app
BUG: 162253907
Change-Id: I74f2f7ea5ff8ce06bfcfeff09aedd980f385ffc7
(cherry picked from commit ae09f6e6686b32c5677c086d51d5737553e2aeb9)
M drawerlayout/drawerlayout/src/main/java/androidx/drawerlayout/widget/DrawerLayout.java
wo...@gmail.com <wo...@gmail.com> #9
Branch: snap-temp-L68100000649916060
commit e33fcbc8c30a40594cfcfbb643018e2bfe024820
Author: Ian Lake <ilake@google.com>
Date: Mon Jul 27 17:51:04 2020
Ensure open() and close() always work
As per the Javadoc on LOCK_MODE_LOCKED_CLOSED
and LOCK_MODE_LOCKED_OPEN, the app should
still be able to open() and close() the drawer
programmatically.
This change aligns open() and close() with
openDrawer() and closeDrawer() to allow
programmatic usage no matter what LOCK_MODE
is used.
Test: tested in sample app
BUG: 162253907
Change-Id: I74f2f7ea5ff8ce06bfcfeff09aedd980f385ffc7
(cherry picked from commit ae09f6e6686b32c5677c086d51d5737553e2aeb9)
M drawerlayout/drawerlayout/src/main/java/androidx/drawerlayout/widget/DrawerLayout.java
wo...@gmail.com <wo...@gmail.com> #10
Branch: snap-temp-L86900000650841826
commit 3ad4cab4e570828fddbf650934a4e9efdd8405e0
Author: Ian Lake <ilake@google.com>
Date: Mon Jul 27 17:51:04 2020
Ensure open() and close() always work
As per the Javadoc on LOCK_MODE_LOCKED_CLOSED
and LOCK_MODE_LOCKED_OPEN, the app should
still be able to open() and close() the drawer
programmatically.
This change aligns open() and close() with
openDrawer() and closeDrawer() to allow
programmatic usage no matter what LOCK_MODE
is used.
Test: tested in sample app
BUG: 162253907
Change-Id: I74f2f7ea5ff8ce06bfcfeff09aedd980f385ffc7
(cherry picked from commit ae09f6e6686b32c5677c086d51d5737553e2aeb9)
M drawerlayout/drawerlayout/src/main/java/androidx/drawerlayout/widget/DrawerLayout.java
di...@gmail.com <di...@gmail.com> #11
Branch: snap-temp-L89900000650843240
commit 978cae5a010bf4c0c1b6fcfd68fd1b1c7802e126
Author: Ian Lake <ilake@google.com>
Date: Mon Jul 27 17:51:04 2020
Ensure open() and close() always work
As per the Javadoc on LOCK_MODE_LOCKED_CLOSED
and LOCK_MODE_LOCKED_OPEN, the app should
still be able to open() and close() the drawer
programmatically.
This change aligns open() and close() with
openDrawer() and closeDrawer() to allow
programmatic usage no matter what LOCK_MODE
is used.
Test: tested in sample app
BUG: 162253907
Change-Id: I74f2f7ea5ff8ce06bfcfeff09aedd980f385ffc7
(cherry picked from commit ae09f6e6686b32c5677c086d51d5737553e2aeb9)
M drawerlayout/drawerlayout/src/main/java/androidx/drawerlayout/widget/DrawerLayout.java
wo...@gmail.com <wo...@gmail.com> #12
Branch: snap-temp-L89900000650864753
commit 2754768be7ccfd570f9355ab74406157e3a69d92
Author: Ian Lake <ilake@google.com>
Date: Mon Jul 27 17:51:04 2020
Ensure open() and close() always work
As per the Javadoc on LOCK_MODE_LOCKED_CLOSED
and LOCK_MODE_LOCKED_OPEN, the app should
still be able to open() and close() the drawer
programmatically.
This change aligns open() and close() with
openDrawer() and closeDrawer() to allow
programmatic usage no matter what LOCK_MODE
is used.
Test: tested in sample app
BUG: 162253907
Change-Id: I74f2f7ea5ff8ce06bfcfeff09aedd980f385ffc7
(cherry picked from commit ae09f6e6686b32c5677c086d51d5737553e2aeb9)
M drawerlayout/drawerlayout/src/main/java/androidx/drawerlayout/widget/DrawerLayout.java
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #13
The following changes were cherrypicked through
Release Track:
Changes: aosp/1373433
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #14
The following changes were cherrypicked through
Release Track:
Changes: aosp/1378185
an...@gmail.com <an...@gmail.com> #15
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit c403da82b263cf8078bacafb9f4661e279a3089c
Author: Ian Lake <ilake@google.com>
Date: Tue Oct 06 13:24:40 2020
Update navigation-ui to depend on DrawerLayout 1.1.1
DrawerLayout 1.1.1 includes a fix to the open()
call used by NavigationUI when locking the drawer.
Test: tested as part of
Relnote: "`navigation-ui` now depends on
[DrawerLayout 1.1.1](/jetpack/androidx/releases/drawerlayout#1.1.1),
ensuring that `NavigationUI` is able to open the drawer
even when using `LOCK_MODE_LOCKED_CLOSED` or
`LOCK_MODE_LOCKED_OPEN`."
Change-Id: Ie2eeec35770138e9d69396c0eea3c1a45e7d757b
M navigation/navigation-ui/build.gradle
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #16
The following changes were cherrypicked through
Release Track:
Changes: aosp/1451099
an...@gmail.com <an...@gmail.com> #17
In my case, all builds of the >50 were a success after checkDependencies = false
. However, disabling checkDependencies
is not a solution as well. Since all our code is split in small logical modules, there is no point in lint. Too many false-positives and true-negatives.
gh...@google.com <gh...@google.com> #18
I cherry-picked a change to 4.1 Beta 4 which essentially changes this error into a logged warning rather than a hard failure. That does not "fix" the problem, but it at least gets us back to the behavior of 3.6. Can someone confirm that this workaround has worked for them?
Also, I think I know what the root cause is (see notes below). However, it's hard to be sure without a repro scenario. Would anyone be willing to share an open-source project that reproduces this bug? (You can also send the project to
Notes:
-
My current theory is that this bug is related to
.https://issuetracker.google.com/159733104#comment6
I.e., I think Lint should not be reusing the same Kotlin compiler environment to analyze multiple modules, which is what we do whencheckDependencies=true
. -
It is still strange that the failure is nondeterministic. However, one potential reason is that the Kotlin compiler caches many things via
SoftReference
.
an...@gmail.com <an...@gmail.com> #19
Sorry for my long delay. I was tried with 4.1.0-beta05
(newest version to date), and the problem is still here. I added new log in case lines were changed.
Would anyone be willing to share an open-source project that reproduces this bug?
I have only closed source project with this problem. Maybe someone knows some quite large multimodule opensource project I could try setup AGP with lint and try reproduction?
an...@gmail.com <an...@gmail.com> #20
I tried to reproduce with two small multimodule projects, but all builds works flawlessly. Also, I tried to reproduce using checkDependencies
, and 6 other helper modules. 145k CLOC without tests. I suppose there is a good chance problem happen due to the cache.
It is still strange that the failure is nondeterministic.
It is even non-deterministic in CI/docker builds using the same fresh environment and exactly the same code each time. Build cache and daemon is disabled there. Multithreading should be involved as well.
In addition, I found in most cases failed due to the same file
br...@google.com <br...@google.com> #21
gh...@google.com <gh...@google.com> #22
There are some architectural changes coming in Lint that will fix this properly, but they will not make it into 4.2.
However, there is another workaround you can try that will be available starting in AGP 4.2 Beta 4.
Essentially you can tell Lint to "reset" the Kotlin compiler between each module analysis, thereby clearing all caches. I did not make this the default behavior because the effect on performance is unknown/risky.
To enable this behavior, either set the environment variable LINT_DO_NOT_REUSE_UAST_ENV
to "true", or set the JVM system property lint.do.not.reuse.uast.env
to "true". For example, you can do this from the command line:
./gradlew -Dlint.do.not.reuse.uast.env=true :app:lintDebug
Or by putting this in your gradle.properties
file:
systemProp.lint.do.not.reuse.uast.env=true
gh...@google.com <gh...@google.com> #23
Status updates:
-
I'm still hoping someone can confirm whether the workaround in
worked for them in AGP 4.2.comment#22 -
Starting with AGP 7.0-alpha13 the root cause of this issue should be fixed completely due to the new "partial analysis" mode (enabled by default) in which Lint analyzes modules independently and merges results along the way. It fixes the issue because Lint will no longer use the same Kotlin compiler environment to analyze multiple modules (and so the risk of stale caches is gone).
ws...@gmail.com <ws...@gmail.com> #24
I'm still hoping someone can confirm whether the workaround in
worked for them in AGP 4.2. comment#22
This unfortunately did not work for us. We actually see lint crashes after enabling via systemProp.lint.do.not.reuse.uast.env=true
. See the attached log. It's also much slower, as expected.
AGP 4.2 seems to make this error much more frequent compared to 4.1, for some reason.
gh...@google.com <gh...@google.com> #25
Can you file a new bug? You can add a comment here linking to it.
ws...@gmail.com <ws...@gmail.com> #26
Sure. Without that workaround, we get the same
ERROR: package fragment is not found for module:<lint-module> is a module[ModuleDescriptorImpl@5e5e6c61] file:KtFile: LiveViewerViewData.kt
error in this ticket occasionally (1-2% of the time?).
gh...@google.com <gh...@google.com> #27
Oh, I misunderstood. So, using lint.do.not.reuse.uast.env
is what causes the new crash? That is unfortunate, and I will investigate. Let me know if there is a sample project you can share that reproduces the issue.
ws...@gmail.com <ws...@gmail.com> #28
Not sure if you still wanted the new bug, but here it is:
gh...@google.com <gh...@google.com> #29
FYI the issue in
And to confirm, lint.do.not.reuse.uast.env
should no longer be needed at all in AGP 7.0+.
ku...@gmail.com <ku...@gmail.com> #30
Thanks #29 . I am noticing that when this happens, after the error log for
package fragment is not found for module:<lintWithKotlin> is a module
There is another error
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Argument for @NotNull parameter 'descriptor' of org/jetbrains/kotlin/codegen/context/CodegenContext.intoPackagePart must not be null
at org.jetbrains.kotlin.codegen.context.CodegenContext.$$$reportNull$$$0(CodegenContext.java)
at org.jetbrains.kotlin.codegen.context.CodegenContext.intoPackagePart(CodegenContext.java)
at org.jetbrains.kotlin.asJava.builder.LightClassDataProviderForClassOrObject$computeLightClassData$1$1.invoke(LightClassDataProvider.kt:51)
at org.jetbrains.kotlin.asJava.builder.LightClassDataProviderForClassOrObject$computeLightClassData$1$1.invoke(LightClassDataProvider.kt:38)
at org.jetbrains.kotlin.asJava.builder.LightClassBuilderKt.buildLightClass(LightClassBuilder.kt:64)
at org.jetbrains.kotlin.asJava.builder.LightClassDataProviderForClassOrObject$computeLightClassData$1.invoke(LightClassDataProvider.kt:47)
at org.jetbrains.kotlin.asJava.builder.LightClassDataProviderForClassOrObject$computeLightClassData$1.invoke(LightClassDataProvider.kt:38)
at org.jetbrains.kotlin.cli.jvm.compiler.CliLightClassGenerationSupport.createDataHolderForClass(CliLightClassGenerationSupport.kt:64)
at org.jetbrains.kotlin.asJava.builder.LightClassDataProviderForClassOrObject.computeLightClassData(LightClassDataProvider.kt:45)
at org.jetbrains.kotlin.asJava.builder.LightClassDataProviderForClassOrObject.compute(LightClassDataProvider.kt:61)
at com.intellij.psi.impl.PsiCachedValueImpl.doCompute(PsiCachedValueImpl.java:54)
at com.intellij.util.CachedValueBase.lambda$getValueWithLock$1(CachedValueBase.java:235)
at com.intellij.openapi.util.RecursionManager$1.doPreventingRecursion(RecursionManager.java:113)
at com.intellij.openapi.util.RecursionManager.doPreventingRecursion(RecursionManager.java:72)
at com.intellij.util.CachedValueBase.getValueWithLock(CachedValueBase.java:236)
at com.intellij.psi.impl.PsiCachedValueImpl.getValue(PsiCachedValueImpl.java:43)
at
Does the fix address both of these?
gh...@google.com <gh...@google.com> #31
package fragment is not found
and Argument for @NotNull parameter...
), the workaround in 4.2 is to put
systemProp.lint.do.not.reuse.uast.env=true
in your gradle.properties
file as described in
gh...@google.com <gh...@google.com> #32
Marking fixed in AGP 7.0.
That is, the lint.do.not.reuse.uast.env
workaround should no longer be needed in AGP 7.0+. And, you should no longer see the following warnings/errors while running Lint:
ERROR: package fragment is not found for module:<lintWithKotlin>...
ERROR: Could not generate LightClass for...
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Argument for @NotNull parameter 'descriptor' of org/jetbrains/kotlin/codegen/context/CodegenContext.intoPackagePart must not be null
The issue is fixed due to the new "Lint partial analysis" mode (enabled by default) which creates a standalone UastEnvironment
instance for each module, thereby avoiding stale caches in the Kotlin compiler frontend.
Please comment on the bug if you see any similar errors in AGP 7.0+.
Description
AGP: 4.0.0 Kotlin: 1.3.72 JVM: from docker image: 8u252-jdk-slim
Failure happens in CI builds, which always are clean. Failures are random. Sometimes builds are a success, but more often it is not. Each time random classes failed. For example, in this case, failed this little data class:
I included full stacktrace as file