Status Update
Comments
il...@google.com <il...@google.com> #2
Information redacted by Android Beta Feedback.
ba...@gmail.com <ba...@gmail.com> #3
Thank you for reporting this issue. We have shared this with our product and engineering team and will update this issue with more information as it becomes available.
il...@google.com <il...@google.com> #4
What
Feature request
Screen record attached. Lock button appears whenever a new notification comes in or briefly when you expand on current notifications.
Where
Build and device data
- Build Number: google/raven_beta/raven:VanillaIceCream/AP31.240426.023/11830707:user/release-keys
(Note: It is the build when sending this report. For exact build reference, please see the attached bugreport.)
Debugging information
Google Play services
com.google.android.gms
Version 241718038 (24.17.18 (190400-633711484))
System App (Updated)
Android System WebView
com.google.android.webview
Version 636758231 (124.0.6367.82)
System App (Updated)
Network operator: Google Fi
SIM operator: Google Fi
Filed by Android Beta Feedback. Version (Updated): 2.42-betterbug.external_20240410_RC03 (DOGFOOD)
To learn more about our feedback process, please visit
Description
Version used: 1.0.0
Devices/Android versions reproduced on: Google Pixel 2XL
I am developing an app by making use of Navigation Architecture Component and I am running into a strange behavior with at least one of the navigation actions I have defined(at least only one has caught my eye yet).
<action
android:id="@+id/action_loginFragment_to_dashboardFragment"
app:destination="@id/dashboardFragment"
app:enterAnim="@anim/slide_in_right"
app:exitAnim="@anim/slide_out_left"
app:popEnterAnim="@anim/slide_in_left"
app:popExitAnim="@anim/slide_in_right"
app:popUpTo="@id/nav_graph"
app:popUpToInclusive="true" />
When this action is executed, it causes a brief recreate and destruction of LandingPageFragment which comes before LoginFragment.
Below I can paste a log that might make it easier to understand what issue I am facing.
The app went through a cold start when the log was produced and I went from A >> B >> C
2019-04-04 14:36:04.103 13457-13457/
2019-04-04 14:36:06.535 13457-13457/
2019-04-04 14:36:06.634 13457-13457/
2019-04-04 14:36:13.676 13457-13457/
2019-04-04 14:36:13.715 13457-13457/
2019-04-04 14:36:13.729 13457-13457/
2019-04-04 14:36:13.866 13457-13457/
the 5th and 7th lines of the logs reflect the anomaly. There is no UI glitch at all, but nonetheless, this is not an intended behavior I would assume and can lead to potential crashes in applications.