Status Update
Comments
so...@google.com <so...@google.com> #2
ed...@google.com <ed...@google.com> #3
ti...@google.com <ti...@google.com> #4
Can you create a full sample for reproducing this issue? That would make it easier to see this issue and look into the error.
br...@google.com <br...@google.com> #5
m....@combocurve.com <m....@combocurve.com> #6
We are experiencing a possibly similar issue on Python CFs starting May 3rd:
Function execution took 342 ms, finished with status: 'connection error'
This SO Answer sent me here:
Does it seem to be the same issue?
na...@gmail.com <na...@gmail.com> #7
ha...@gmail.com <ha...@gmail.com> #8
I'm getting random connection errors even when the size of the request is less than 1 kb.
The function is being called every hour using Cloud Scheduler and the failures don't happen at any particular time in the day, it's completely random.
ca...@google.com <ca...@google.com> #9
Hi,
the product team continues working on this.
fr...@gmail.com <fr...@gmail.com> #10
We are having the same issue with PHP function.
pa...@google.com <pa...@google.com> #11
Hi.
The Engineering team is still working on this issue, please expect updates on this channel.
je...@twinkl.com.au <je...@twinkl.com.au> #12
Unfortunately, we are seeing intermittent blank body content (headers intact) - for the problematic requests, the content-length header is missing and chunked transfer encoding appears to be in play.
The specification of the SG Webhook states that calls will be made every 30s OR when content reaches 768kb (meaning there should be no 10MB cloud function limit in play here).
There appears to be a number of historical bugs with FASTCGI and chunked encoding, plus some with ngnix, both of which appear to be in play looking at the cloud function startup logs. It looks like the only option is to revert to NodeJS whilst this issue is resolved... it'd be interesting to know whether the issue we are seeing is related to this same issue, or whether we ought to create a new one.
gu...@google.com <gu...@google.com> #13
The Engineering team is still working on this issue, please expect updates on this channel.
al...@gmail.com <al...@gmail.com> #14
ga...@google.com <ga...@google.com> #15
product team is still working on this issue, please expect updates on this channel.
Thanks.
go...@google.com <go...@google.com> #16
I have a customer facing the similar issue. go/sf/29759975, any updates on this?
ta...@retail-ai.jp <ta...@retail-ai.jp> #17
How long google engineers are going to work on this? It's been 2 years ...... Should we pay extra pennies for the escalation :)
lu...@dim28.ch <lu...@dim28.ch> #18
va...@google.com <va...@google.com>
su...@google.com <su...@google.com>
an...@trendmicro.com <an...@trendmicro.com> #19
Is there any update on this case?
ja...@gmail.com <ja...@gmail.com> #20
ba...@google.com <ba...@google.com>
su...@google.com <su...@google.com> #21
Hello,
Thank you for your cooperation.
We have an update from the engineering team.Engineering team is no longer able to reproduce this. It was tested for python 3.8 and works as expected. Hence it might be fixed for you as well..
I am going to close this thread which will no longer be monitored.If you have any further questions or need assistance with any other matter, please don't hesitate to create a new issue on the
Description
When sending an HTTP Post text payload over 10KB cloud functions reject it
Expected behavior: Payload size limit is over 10 mb according to this doc [1] so request over 10 kb and below 10 mb should be processed
Steps to reproduce:
1. Follow the hello world quickstart (in python) [2]
2 Then, you need to send a post request as follows:
3. This will issue the error message 'Error: could not handle the request'.
4. If you switch this command to
[1]
[2]