WAI
Status Update
No update yet.
Comments
ad...@google.com
Microsoft doc: https://support.microsoft.com/en-ca/help/2999226/update-for-universal-c-runtime-in-windows
Platform 28.0.2 readme:https://developer.android.com/studio/releases/platform-tools
"
Updated Windows requirements
The platform tools now depend on the Windows Universal C Runtime, which is usually installed by default via Windows Update. If you see errors mentioning missing DLLs, you may need to manually fetch and install the runtime package.
"
Platform 28.0.2 readme:
"
Updated Windows requirements
The platform tools now depend on the Windows Universal C Runtime, which is usually installed by default via Windows Update. If you see errors mentioning missing DLLs, you may need to manually fetch and install the runtime package.
"
vi...@gmail.com
Note: see also
ad...@google.com
Bug cleaning...what is the status on this? Looks like the depending bug is fixed.
lb...@gmail.com
I noticed that the WINDOWS_UCRT_CHECK_ENABLED Studio flag defaults to false. Should this be set to true eventually, or can this code be deleted?
lb...@gmail.com
Hannah, I am pretty sure we did enable this. Do you know why/when it was disabled?
ad...@google.com
Ummm... it doesn't look like it was ever enabled, and the flag hasn't been touched since the initial CL in 2019. I don't know why it was never enabled. Better 4 years late than never?
lb...@gmail.com
@7 But why reserve space for something that's not appearing, always?
Why can't we disable it?
There is a setting to auto-hide it. What's the purpose of auto-hide it, if the space is reserved?
Why this waste of space?
I expand it and get 6, while I had 6 before expanding.
Why can't it auto-resize when it gets shown, instead?
Why this poor choice of UX ?
For the same reason, you could have in the settings various preferences that instead of appearing - always exist and take space.
Or if you develop an app with ads, you could put an empty space for ads, even if the ad isn't going to be shown...
Why can't we disable it?
There is a setting to auto-hide it. What's the purpose of auto-hide it, if the space is reserved?
Why this waste of space?
I expand it and get 6, while I had 6 before expanding.
Why can't it auto-resize when it gets shown, instead?
Why this poor choice of UX ?
For the same reason, you could have in the settings various preferences that instead of appearing - always exist and take space.
Or if you develop an app with ads, you could put an empty space for ads, even if the ad isn't going to be shown...
zm...@gmail.com
I agree, it feels like a bug since I do not have media playing at least 75% of the times I open quick setings. I would understand limiting it to 2 rows per page when expanded media controls are shown, but the rest of the time, it feels like wasted space when my screen can fit 6 rows of home screen icons with room to spare for the search box and bottom shelf/dock, but only 2 rows of quick settings icons below the status bar and brightness slider.
lb...@gmail.com
@7 Why did you close the requests I've written, with the explanation " This is a product feature issue; not a developer issue. Our Android Support team will be in contact with you shortly.
..."
?
It's about Android OS. This is the place to talk about it...
..."
?
It's about Android OS. This is the place to talk about it...
so...@gmail.com
Quick settings are more useful than media control. Apple is doing right here.
sp...@gmail.com
This is definitely a regression and breaking of expected behavior for Android users. There should at least be a toggle to allow for three rows, and perhaps a dynamic handling of row count based on media player presence.
It is added friction having to swipe down then sideways, to both view and access quick settings.
It is added friction having to swipe down then sideways, to both view and access quick settings.
ch...@gmail.com
When you use the the quick options all the time and never use the media player, this is a major regression. Just annoying.
ge...@gmail.com
It may be "intended" behavior but that does not mean it makes for a positive UI experience. Short-sight is not a feature. You should make this adjustable like custom ROMs have been allowing for ages. The commits are out there, this is open source... But I suppose it would be too intuitive to give users options while deciding what you think is best for us. Becoming more like apple every day.
up...@gmail.com
Just because is "intended" behaviour it doesn't mean is a good idea...
lb...@gmail.com
@16 Is this available on most ROMs ?
sw...@gmail.com
I am unable to take screenshots on my pixel since the update. It does not give me the option to take a screenshot when I follow the instructions 😩
cl...@gmail.com
UI regression, please fix. As many have said, two rows makes sense if the media player is active but the UI should display three rows if the player is not active.
lb...@gmail.com
And now there is an article about this:
https://www.androidpolice.com/2020/09/14/google-ruined-the-quick-settings-panel-in-android-11/
Found from :
https://www.reddit.com/r/GooglePixel/comments/isqlkv/pull_down_for_the_same_settings_why/
Guys, please consider starring these alternative solutions to request from Google, and also requests to make it as good as we had before :
https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/166760793
https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/166760792
https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/166654168
https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/166639596
https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/166658113
https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/166155024
https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/168295617
https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/168524917
I know it's too late. But maybe in the next version we will see better UX.
Found from :
Guys, please consider starring these alternative solutions to request from Google, and also requests to make it as good as we had before :
I know it's too late. But maybe in the next version we will see better UX.
me...@gmail.com
I don't care if it's because of the media player or not. What difference does it make if there is one more row, pushing the media player down a little? Better yet - we already have the first six when we swipe down the first time. Second swipe should automatically switch to the second page. Problem solved.
am...@gmail.com
Lol, whats the point for expanding it? You already have access to the 6 buttons.
If you reply with the point for expanding it is to get to the 2nd page, then its a design flaw
If all 6 buttons are already visible, you should let it swipe to access the 2nd page without the need to expand it
If you make it expand, it should show whats not available when not expanded
If you reply with the point for expanding it is to get to the 2nd page, then its a design flaw
If all 6 buttons are already visible, you should let it swipe to access the 2nd page without the need to expand it
If you make it expand, it should show whats not available when not expanded
of...@gmail.com
Three rows if the player is or not active, always was better.
tb...@gmail.com
Space needs to be dedicated according to usage frequency. As settings are being used significantly more frequently than media player, media player must not waste space of settings rows. Even more so if media player is not active. Extremely annoying UI choice to force this onto every user in every possible use scenario just for the sake of one single relatively rare use case: Media Player.
ux...@mikageo.com
This new "feature" is a step back. Quick settings should be quick settings not duplicated setting in a different layout. Come on Google, you can do better than that.
lb...@gmail.com
jo...@gmail.com
"Quick Settings" becoming less quick to use and showing fewer settings is directly a regression of its intended purpose. "Expanding" to not show any additional settings is a joke. Even if the media player were running, I would never want it to take priority over access to important settings that I want to change quickly. An option should exist to re-enable the 3rd row. This is an inconvenient, annoying, unwanted, wasteful design choice. Horrible. It's mind-boggling that someone's design intent for the GUI of an OS would be to chop off part of the interface used to operate the system. Similarly, in my car, I do not ever desire for the media control button on my steering wheel to take over 1/3 of the gear shift paddle space.
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
UI regression, please fix. If i want to change music related things i either use the headset buttons or open the music player to change playlist not the quick settings menu which is now less usable.
fi...@gmail.com
The fuck are you doing Google?! This is stupid. Change it back to 3 rows or at least let us customize it. When the fuck did you begin to think you know what's best for us?
de...@gmail.com
one more voice to the list. this is a bad move and very anti-user. quick settings are far more important than media controls, especially because almost ALL of us are listening to media on earbuds that can already pause or control volume. or on vehicle sound systems.
making users swipe downward and then side-to-side for quick settings panel items is infuriating and wildly unnecessary.
give users a way to turn this functionality off.
making users swipe downward and then side-to-side for quick settings panel items is infuriating and wildly unnecessary.
give users a way to turn this functionality off.
ca...@gmail.com
For every introduced functionality should be an off/on toggle.
I didn't used media controls at all on my Pixel3. Why I have to see it at all? I know what I'm playing on Spottily or Soundcloud.
This is a bug to show only 2 rows when nothing else is displayed underneath. How this can be Intended behavior?
I didn't used media controls at all on my Pixel3. Why I have to see it at all? I know what I'm playing on Spottily or Soundcloud.
This is a bug to show only 2 rows when nothing else is displayed underneath. How this can be Intended behavior?
ad...@gmail.com
This is unacceptable.
This is a huge issue for my Android workflows.
Please give uses a setting to turn off the media control "feature," and to allow for 3 rows in the quick settings always.
This is a huge issue for my Android workflows.
Please give uses a setting to turn off the media control "feature," and to allow for 3 rows in the quick settings always.
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
Iam using one plus8 android open beta 2 there are so many bugs there I noticed
1 third party apps not working
2 banking apps not working
3. Less sound
4.less animation
5.some times whatsapp video calling not working properly
6. Less stablity
7 camera software should be improve
8. If possible wireless charging done via software in one plus 8
Kindly fix bugs soon
Thanking you
1 third party apps not working
2 banking apps not working
3. Less sound
4.less animation
5.some times whatsapp video calling not working properly
6. Less stablity
7 camera software should be improve
8. If possible wireless charging done via software in one plus 8
Kindly fix bugs soon
Thanking you
sn...@gmail.com
Please fix this terrible UI choice. This was immediately noticeable as a regression to my eyes.
Thanks,
Thomas
Thanks,
Thomas
ar...@gmail.com
This is the stupidest change I can imagine... it literally makes it completely pointless to open the options panel as it has EXACTLY the same options I can access when it's closed. This is a terrible change.
mb...@gmail.com
Having to swipe twice for quick settings is a pain. The music to show only when I've swiped my notifications down twice is annoying. It was convenient when It showed as a normal app rather than in my quick settings, which also won't close the music app all the way.
Please revert back to 3-row quick settings and remove the music app off of it. Thanks.
Please revert back to 3-row quick settings and remove the music app off of it. Thanks.
ad...@planetcoding.net
Just make things configurable for fuck's sake. Not everyone using Android is a monkey who can't make decisions on their own...
jp...@gmail.com
The fact this behavior is working as intended does not make it acceptable as it negates the purpose of quick settings. Quick settings options are now so minimal it's painful.
dr...@gmail.com
Just because you meant to break my $1000 phone in this particular way doesn't mean that you breaking my $1000 phone in this particular way is not a bug.
ra...@gmail.com
Won't Fix (Intended behavior) is not going to make frustrated users disappear—nor will it appease developers who spent their time and resources adding custom Tiles to Quick Settings only to see them actively ignored. No users are going to bother with them when only six are displayed, the rest are undiscoverable, and even if they do there will be more than six system level settings that take precedence over any from apps.
lo...@gmail.com
Java enabled false i get that many restrictions reporting I have finally got all information I need. Finding right way to send report is resting me and has for 2years
R....@hotmail.com
WHAT!?!? NOW IT IS JUST ONE ROW?
Today I noticed that it is not displaying 2 rows anymore, it has been reduced to 1 row when I have no other player or notifications displayed.
Today I noticed that it is not displaying 2 rows anymore, it has been reduced to 1 row when I have no other player or notifications displayed.
hr...@gmail.com
I support this reporter. The new two rows menu is very annoying.
I was using all of 9 buttons in this menu and hardly ever listening to a music. It is mainly phone and working equipment for me. Why it is not allowed to set it up? I please you to give us chance to have 9 buttons menu back.
I was using all of 9 buttons in this menu and hardly ever listening to a music. It is mainly phone and working equipment for me. Why it is not allowed to set it up? I please you to give us chance to have 9 buttons menu back.
sd...@gmail.com
The lack of extra quick setting button upon expanding is the very first thing I notice since updating to Android 11.
Expanding space and getting NOTHING extra is plain stupid, bad UI, bad UX.
The grid size of quick settings should be configurable
Expanding space and getting NOTHING extra is plain stupid, bad UI, bad UX.
The grid size of quick settings should be configurable
ev...@gmail.com
Yes, crazy bad idea to show same amount of icons in expanded mode as in contracted. Whats the point of expanding then? Just poor UX designer job at google.
cb...@specsavers.com
latest update will not install past 26% and now, I cant use my phone at all. it will neither turn on nor off and flashes up the restart screen every few seconds, THat's it! wtf do I do? can anyone help?
as...@gmail.com
Oppo f19 pro, ColorOS 11. Not Show Miss call notification and badge or Number.....
ce...@gmail.com
i hate the two row quick setting restriction, why not give us the option to have three rows. Now there is so much unused space at the bottom. I want to sooo root my phone and try another rom now :(
Description
If the issue is not due to a platform bug, we will do our best to route the issue. However, note that it is up to the app/oem developer to actually address reported issues.
Before logging your issue, check to see whether it is a known issue described in the current release notes at:
or has already been reported at:
If the issue has already been reported, you can "star" or comment on the existing report if it corresponds to the issue you are seeing.
To expedite resolution of your issue, please provide as much relevant and specific information as possible. This will probably require some work from you. Most reports should include at least the following:
* Are you an Android developer?" (Y/N)
* Which Android Developer Preview build are you using? See Settings > About phone > Build number (for example RPP1.200123.000).
Issue started with yesterday's beta 2 release
* Is this a regression from Android 10 to 11?
* What device are you using? (for example, Pixel 3 XL)
Pixel 4 xl
* What are the steps to reproduce the problem? (Please provide the minimal reproducible test case.)
Pull down from top to get quick options/notifications.
The old behavior was that it would come down to fill screen. We could see all options and notifications.
Since beta 2, it only fills two rows on the screen and fails to expand down.
* Issue Category e.g. Framework (platform), NDK (platform), Hardware (CPU, GPU, Sensor, Camera), ART (platform), Runtime Permissions etc
* What was the expected result?
* Can you provide the API document where this expected behavior is explained?
* What was the actual result?
* Relevant logcat output.
* Link to captured Android bug report (shared privately in Drive.)
* Optional: Link to any screenshot(s) that demonstrate the issue (shared privately in Drive.)
To avoid the possibility of sharing private information, please share bugreports and screenshots from Google Drive. Share files with android-bugreport@google.com and include only Google drive links in your bug. Please note, bug report attachments should not be included directly in issue reports.
Disclaimer:
Please note, by submitting this bug report, you acknowledge that Google may use information included in the bug report to diagnose technical issues and to improve our products and services, in accordance with our Privacy Policy (
Bug reports include personal information logged on your device or by apps, such as:
File names
Installed apps and usage
Email addresses of the profiles on the device
Device identifiers, such as phone number
Web history information, including URLs / URIs
Location information, including limited location history
Network information, such as IP/SSID/MAC addresses and saved or scanned APNs
System or device information, such as memory and processes