Assigned
Status Update
Comments
se...@google.com <se...@google.com> #2
I need imageio to use the geotiff-jai library for extracting GeoTIFF tags so I can
create a KML server.
create a KML server.
se...@google.com <se...@google.com> #3
Also the native implementation of javax.imageio and the associated Sun jai-imageio
stuff eg com.sun.media.imageio.plugins.*.
This will significantly speed up image processing and will reduce used CPU hours/load
(which will be beneficial to Google too)
stuff eg com.sun.media.imageio.plugins.*.
This will significantly speed up image processing and will reduce used CPU hours/load
(which will be beneficial to Google too)
sh...@gmail.com <sh...@gmail.com> #4
How about using a pure Java imaging library? For example, is anybody willing to try
Sanselan and see if it meets their needs?
http://incubator.apache.org/sanselan/site/index.html
Sanselan and see if it meets their needs?
an...@google.com <an...@google.com>
se...@google.com <se...@google.com> #5
Thanks for that link sounds interesting.
It's amazing what you can find on Apache these days!
Hmm, it could be very usefull for people after a pure Java replacement for ImageIO.
Pnly problem I have is that it doesn't have a GeoTIFF wrapper, but I'm sure that
won't be too hard.
May I suggest a wiki page be created with a list of alternative class libraries for
the blacklisted java.* classes?
I would still prefer the ImageIO classes be accessible (along with the other
blacklisted standard java.* packages...) as ImageIO allows for a speedy native
implementation of the core algorithims. And is generally more compatible with a lot
of existing software.
Only reason I can see this being blacklisted is because you want to force us to user
your imaging API which is billable (per call).
It's amazing what you can find on Apache these days!
Hmm, it could be very usefull for people after a pure Java replacement for ImageIO.
Pnly problem I have is that it doesn't have a GeoTIFF wrapper, but I'm sure that
won't be too hard.
May I suggest a wiki page be created with a list of alternative class libraries for
the blacklisted java.* classes?
I would still prefer the ImageIO classes be accessible (along with the other
blacklisted standard java.* packages...) as ImageIO allows for a speedy native
implementation of the core algorithims. And is generally more compatible with a lot
of existing software.
Only reason I can see this being blacklisted is because you want to force us to user
your imaging API which is billable (per call).
ta...@gmail.com <ta...@gmail.com> #6
se...@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com> #7
Would richfaces works ?
I need an answer please
I need an answer please
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #8
I got the same error coming from Spring framework 3.0:
Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax.imageio.ImageIO is a restricted class. Please see the
Google App Engine developer's guide for more details.
at com.google.apphosting.runtime.security.shared.stub.javax.imageio.ImageIO.<clinit>(ImageIO.java)
at
org.springframework.http.converter.BufferedImageHttpMessageConverter.<init>(BufferedImageHttpMessageC
onverter.java:70)
at
org.springframework.web.servlet.mvc.annotation.AnnotationMethodHandlerAdapter.<init>(AnnotationMethod
HandlerAdapter.java:166)
at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Unknown Source)
at
com.google.apphosting.runtime.security.shared.intercept.java.lang.reflect.Constructor_.newInstance(Construc
tor_.java:60)
at org.springframework.beans.BeanUtils.instantiateClass(BeanUtils.java:127)
Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax.imageio.ImageIO is a restricted class. Please see the
Google App Engine developer's guide for more details.
at com.google.apphosting.runtime.security.shared.stub.javax.imageio.ImageIO.<clinit>(ImageIO.java)
at
org.springframework.http.converter.BufferedImageHttpMessageConverter.<init>(BufferedImageHttpMessageC
onverter.java:70)
at
org.springframework.web.servlet.mvc.annotation.AnnotationMethodHandlerAdapter.<init>(AnnotationMethod
HandlerAdapter.java:166)
at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Unknown Source)
at
com.google.apphosting.runtime.security.shared.intercept.java.lang.reflect.Constructor_.newInstance(Construc
tor_.java:60)
at org.springframework.beans.BeanUtils.instantiateClass(BeanUtils.java:127)
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #9
Please add rich faces support on GAE
mi...@onfleet.com <mi...@onfleet.com> #10
Yes... please add RichFaces support!
ne...@gmail.com <ne...@gmail.com> #11
please add richfaces support
p....@gmail.com <p....@gmail.com> #12
[Comment deleted]
mi...@gmail.com <mi...@gmail.com> #13
yes.. richfaces would be perfect on google appengine
se...@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com> #14
Wonder if you could provide and adapter for ImageIO that would use the Google image
libraries.
libraries.
h....@mytaxi.com <h....@mytaxi.com> #15
Along with ImageIO, google appengine would also need to lift restrictions on
java.awt.Dimension, java.awt.Color, and some Graphics2D classes for RichFaces to work
on AppEngine. I would urge google to allow these classes so that at least some simple
functionality of RichFaces would work.
java.awt.Dimension, java.awt.Color, and some Graphics2D classes for RichFaces to work
on AppEngine. I would urge google to allow these classes so that at least some simple
functionality of RichFaces would work.
ad...@google.com <ad...@google.com> #16
Please add richfaces support. Thanks.
ht...@root.ch <ht...@root.ch> #17
please add richfaces support
pa...@airtable.com <pa...@airtable.com> #18
does anybody knows why richfaces using ImageIO?
pb...@gmail.com <pb...@gmail.com> #19
Please provide richfaces support. It's very impoprtant since many people use
richfaces and would like to deploy these applications to App Engine
richfaces and would like to deploy these applications to App Engine
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #20
I want to add some valication code image in the register form of my app. If ImageIO
is not in the whitelist, how can I do this? Google App Engine is such a toy!
is not in the whitelist, how can I do this? Google App Engine is such a toy!
ma...@ethersuite.io <ma...@ethersuite.io> #21
Please add richfaces support.
PS: Richfaces also references java.awt.Dimension, which is another restricted class.
Thanks.
PS: Richfaces also references java.awt.Dimension, which is another restricted class.
Thanks.
pb...@gmail.com <pb...@gmail.com> #22
Please, add RichFaces support. Thank you.
al...@google.com <al...@google.com> #23
Please, add RichFaces support. We can't port our devs to GAE because of that.
da...@gmail.com <da...@gmail.com> #24
Please, add it!!!!! I can't use GAE without RichFaces
se...@q42.nl <se...@q42.nl> #25
Another vote for richfaces support for GAE
mi...@gmail.com <mi...@gmail.com> #26
I vote.......
RichFaces for GAE
RichFaces for GAE
pe...@gmail.com <pe...@gmail.com> #27
Please, add RichFaces support. Thank you.
Description
snapshot: 6759487
Requesting a new API to scope ViewModel lifecycle to a composable scope.
example of incorrect usage
This came up when a ViewModel was incorrectly being re-used for the same screen with different parameters:
This code incorrectly re-uses
postId
for multiple copies of the same composable, when it instead expects a new ViewModel for this screen.example of correct usage
Fixed in JetNews sample inhttps://github.com/android/compose-samples/pull/116/commits/80a400ab9ea615a5f2bb5b90166951d97ed08ec3
New call with correct behavior scopes the ViewModel to the composable lifecycle:
sample API (that doesn't retain on configuration changes)
We should create a public API that allows developers to conveniently scope ViewModel to composition lifecycle.