Status Update
Comments
fe...@gmail.com <fe...@gmail.com> #2
Could we get an official response to this feature request? Is there an idea to support SafeArgs in navigation-compose one day? Not asking for any time frames. Maybe there is no plans for statically generated args for navigation-compose at all.
vi...@google.com <vi...@google.com>
al...@gmail.com <al...@gmail.com> #3
Part 1-
Part 2-
Github repo-
ak...@gmail.com <ak...@gmail.com> #5
+1
vi...@google.com <vi...@google.com> #6
this library make it super easy if can you support this on the native way
ra...@gmail.com <ra...@gmail.com> #7
Here's a library that does just this:
ld...@gmail.com <ld...@gmail.com> #8
something similar to 'compose-destinations' should be officially available to the devs. Its a pain to manage all the parameters manually.
Currently, I am working with a custom NavType implementation with Gson.
mi...@gmail.com <mi...@gmail.com> #9
sh...@google.com <sh...@google.com> #10
Google team are there any news/priorities on this? Are you planning on improve the existing compose-navigation lib or this is going to not feasible😉?
gc...@google.com <gc...@google.com>
hi...@gmail.com <hi...@gmail.com> #12
Re navigate
calls) from @Serializable
classes.
There's a lot of parts to this, so please bear with us. We'll make sure to write a public blog post explaining much of the reasoning and other alternatives we looked into when we're ready to make a public release.
Description
Key idea: allow user, after giving explicit consent in settings dialogue to enter alternative pin/password for unlocking the device, that is intended to unconditionally wipe the data from the device. The reasoning behind is to keep user in control of his or her data even when being opposed by criminals or corrupt government officers.
This would require additional menu item in settings, legally-proven additional consent screen, screen to enter the panic password, and a backend engine that resets the device to factory settings.
It's understandable that this feature would require significant engineering effort and may not fit into the current priorities of the development team, so the key questions in this issue are:
1. Does this feature fits into google's vision of user's security model? (If not, why not?)
2. Is there any chance that this will be implemented by google?
3. Will you accept pull requests/patches if this will be implemented by community?