Assigned
Status Update
Comments
cl...@google.com <cl...@google.com> #2
I just attached a minimal test application with duplicated and multiline traces. Provided are a couple of logcat files and screenshots.
To me this isn'r really a big problem, since AS compiles my application and lets me debug it. That's what I use it for in my company. I just found it a bit annoying that something that worked one way in AS 2.x and 3.0, suddenly changed in 3.1. The new way results more time-consuming to me while debugging and reviewing the logs.
Could this be made configurable? Not necessarily in the UI, but editing some properties file. Thanks. :)
To me this isn'r really a big problem, since AS compiles my application and lets me debug it. That's what I use it for in my company. I just found it a bit annoying that something that worked one way in AS 2.x and 3.0, suddenly changed in 3.1. The new way results more time-consuming to me while debugging and reviewing the logs.
Could this be made configurable? Not necessarily in the UI, but editing some properties file. Thanks. :)
qi...@gmail.com <qi...@gmail.com> #3
I have the same problem.
cl...@google.com <cl...@google.com> #4
I also have the same problem.
qi...@gmail.com <qi...@gmail.com> #5
I also have the same problem.
cl...@google.com <cl...@google.com> #6
I also have the same problem.
qi...@gmail.com <qi...@gmail.com> #7
I also have the same problem.
qi...@gmail.com <qi...@gmail.com> #8
Was it fixed reverting to the old behavior, or was it fixed making the deduplication configurable?
What release version will include the fix?
What release version will include the fix?
cl...@google.com <cl...@google.com> #9
I still have the same problem on my version.
Android Studio 3.1.1
Build #AI-173.4697961, built on April 4, 2018
JRE: 1.8.0_152-release-1024-b02 amd64
JVM: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM by JetBrains s.r.o
Windows 8.1 6.3
Screenshot attached.
Is there any way to customize this kind of behavior?
Android Studio 3.1.1
Build #AI-173.4697961, built on April 4, 2018
JRE: 1.8.0_152-release-1024-b02 amd64
JVM: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM by JetBrains s.r.o
Windows 8.1 6.3
Screenshot attached.
Is there any way to customize this kind of behavior?
qi...@gmail.com <qi...@gmail.com> #10
@jose.aladro.jsc@gmail.com This change in behavior was inadvertent and I reverted it. The fix will go out in 3.2.
Description
We have a question, should R8 complete the correct processing of the following code when only keeping the main function? Under normal circumstances, the reflection call should call the dMeth function normally, but when using R8 and only keeping the main function, R8 will eliminate the dMeth function, and finally the reflection call cannot be performed normally. Is it necessary to actively consider all reflection calls when using R8 and add them to the proguard rules?