Infeasible
Status Update
Comments
vi...@google.com <vi...@google.com> #2
for example, many different devices return the same longitude and latitude.such as : longitude is 121.474000 and latitude is 31.230001.
i donnot understand why is the data the same?
i donnot understand why is the data the same?
em...@gmail.com <em...@gmail.com> #3 Restricted
Restricted
Comment has been deleted.
em...@gmail.com <em...@gmail.com> #4 Restricted
Restricted
Comment has been deleted.
vi...@google.com <vi...@google.com> #5
Please provide the requested information to proceed further. Unfortunately the issue will be closed within 7 days if there is no further update.
vi...@google.com <vi...@google.com> #6
I only aply permission android.permission.ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION.I use android.location.Location in the program.
for example,we hava 100 users.
20 users returned the same location information, longitude is 121.474000 and latitude is 31.230001。
30 users returned the same location information, longitude is 122.474000 and latitude is 32.230001。
15 users returned the same location information, longitude is 120.474000 and latitude is 30.230001。
as for Android build,all versions have it.
I dont reprodouce this issue.
what may be the cause of this issue?please
for example,we hava 100 users.
20 users returned the same location information, longitude is 121.474000 and latitude is 31.230001。
30 users returned the same location information, longitude is 122.474000 and latitude is 32.230001。
15 users returned the same location information, longitude is 120.474000 and latitude is 30.230001。
as for Android build,all versions have it.
I dont reprodouce this issue.
what may be the cause of this issue?please
Description
Description
My wireless network uses WPA2-Enterprise security, with EAP-TLS authentication. I have configured my Puxel 9 Pro XL to connect to the network. Shortly after, my Pixel Watch arrived, which does not support WPA2-Enterprise. To allow it to connect, I have configured my network to allow WPA2-PSK authentication for that SSID for the watch alone, and issued it an individual passphrase. Both devices connected fine - the phone was using WPA2-Enterprise with EAP-TLS, and the watch was using WPA2-Personal with the passphrase. At one point I left home, and disabled Wi-Fi on my phone. After coming home, I re-enabled Wi-Fi on my phone, and the phone was prompting me for a password to connect to the network, despite it having configured WPA2-Enteprise credentials, and having previously used them. I checked my AP logs, and those credentials were not being rejected, in fact, no connection attempt was being made at all.
The network uses a hidden SSID. The EAP-TLS scheme uses a 2-tier self-signed CA. There is a Root CA, which issued a Wi-Fi CA certificate, which further issued a certificate for the RADIUS server and for the clients. So the scheme looks like this (not actual domain names):
The phone's Wi-Fi security is configured as such:
This particular issue occurs with a phone and a watch, but it should happen regardless of other device types.
Affected devices
Steps to reproduce
Expected result
Both devices connect to the network.
Actual result
The first device does not connect, and instead prompts for a password.
Workaround
Currently, I have worked around this issue by configuring the primary SSID to use WPA2-Enterprise security only, and created a separate SSID with WPA2-PSK security for the watch. This is a rather inconvenient setup, however.