Obsolete
Status Update
Comments
vi...@google.com <vi...@google.com> #2
Surely this is something that the developer can handle themselves. If they just have a reference to the Marker then add a custom property to the marker and use that as the id, I don't think we need to start adding more info to Marker objects for everyone.
I would need more use cases where this is out of the developers hands before I would consider putting this in the API.
I would need more use cases where this is out of the developers hands before I would consider putting this in the API.
Description