Status Update
Comments
en...@google.com <en...@google.com>
sa...@gmail.com <sa...@gmail.com> #2
We’ve shared this with our product and engineering teams and will continue to provide updates as more information becomes available.
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #3
mp...@gmail.com <mp...@gmail.com> #4
an...@gmail.com <an...@gmail.com> #5
mu...@authenticatorplus.com <mu...@authenticatorplus.com> #6
sa...@gmail.com <sa...@gmail.com> #7
if this Issue is not Resolved Soon. I will (I dont Know) but i paid over 1500.00 for a Device and i cant Access the Stuff i want.... and Articles that i used back A.11 Days are now Denied Access... KB196422354
Android 13 is a Joke if it Prevents People from Technical Experence from Doing what they want heck thats what the Developer Mode was For. now you have Bricked us again...
lu...@gmail.com <lu...@gmail.com> #8
lu...@gmail.com <lu...@gmail.com> #9
lu...@gmail.com <lu...@gmail.com> #10
I can only support this if there is a way to fake the directory path that the app sees. That is, I need to be able to trick Chinese apps so that they can't tell the difference between me giving them a subfolder and them forcing me to give them access to all my files. Otherwise, this may threaten my physical safety when I travel.
I am the author of the other issue. I faced extreme trauma when my Chinese family compelled and coerced me to install the WeChat app. At that time WeChat closed itself on launch if it was not given the storage permission and my family kept pressuring me. Unlike the free world, China does not respect the freedom against search and seizure. Chinese companies can be forced to hand over any data to the Chinese government. Other Chinese apps mentioned in other issues are DJI and Insta360. What would happen if WeChat scanned a protest photo with my geolocation?
Back then I had Lineage AppOps and Xposed and was able to somehow restrict the storage permission. Today, those don't exist anymore. In the future I may be relying on solely how SAM keeps those apps in check. I have root so I love this feature, and do not hate it. I would rather Android remove the storage feature like earlier iOS than have a foreign government see my photos.
There is an alternative solution that both I and the power users above would accept. That would be to give me an option to trick any foreign app into thinking it was given any specified folder. Everyone else can then grant their backup and file managers access to their whole storage.
or...@gmail.com <or...@gmail.com> #11
ka...@gmail.com <ka...@gmail.com> #12
mi...@gmail.com <mi...@gmail.com> #13
ka...@gmail.com <ka...@gmail.com> #14
mo...@gmail.com <mo...@gmail.com> #15
I am unable to restore data or bring certain files in from my previous phone. We all paid for our devices and are unable to use them as expected without rooting and voiding our warranties.
bd...@google.com <bd...@google.com> #16
ka...@gmail.com <ka...@gmail.com> #17
ka...@gmail.com <ka...@gmail.com> #18
do...@kodroid.com <do...@kodroid.com> #19
do...@googlemail.com <do...@googlemail.com> #20
rt...@gmail.com <rt...@gmail.com> #21
co...@gmail.com <co...@gmail.com> #22
ca...@gmail.com <ca...@gmail.com> #23
do...@kodroid.com <do...@kodroid.com> #24
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #25
If we as userrs are not even having an option to choose if we want to access data and obb folder, how is android being a user friendly OS ? The best part about android was freedom of users, which looks to be snatched.
Please do not make android, the next IOS.
do...@kodroid.com <do...@kodroid.com> #26
On Monday, January 23, 2023, <buganizer-system@google.com> wrote:
ch...@gmail.com <ch...@gmail.com> #27
I will not buy a device unless it can be unGargoyled.
This day has been coming for a long, long time as each version of Android© has gotten more and more restrictive with more privacy invasion and less freedom for the purchaser. Notice I didn't say owner?
I bought a LG v50 and v60 and made sure by checking on XDA that they could be rooted before I purchased them.
Good luck with getting Gargoyle to do anything for you and since the US government has been bought and paid for by corporate America many years ago you'll get no help from them.
do...@kodroid.com <do...@kodroid.com> #28
mo...@gmail.com <mo...@gmail.com> #29
dp...@protonmail.com <dp...@protonmail.com> #30
mo...@gmail.com <mo...@gmail.com> #31
do...@googlemail.com <do...@googlemail.com> #32
do...@kodroid.com <do...@kodroid.com> #33
sw...@google.com <sw...@google.com> #35
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #36
gu...@gmail.com <gu...@gmail.com> #37
jf...@gmail.com <jf...@gmail.com> #38
But the button is greyed out when I am in the root folder.
I feel like I'm going around in circles. It might be because I am going around in circles.
Please let me select whatever folder on the SD card that I paid for with my own sheckles and groats.....in a phone that I paid for with my own sheckles and groats.
That would be fantastic. Thanks so much.
Description
while we were testing the new AndroidKeyStore with Android >= 4.3 (API 18), we have noticed that after creating a keypair with the KeyPairGenerator and using it, if we change the screen lock ( from PIN to Password for example ), the AndroidKeyStore is recreated empty and the previous generated keypair are deleted.
During the test we have used your SDK Example in android-sdk-mac_x86/samples/android-18/security/keystore/BasicAndroidKeyStore and in our custom application also the same behaviour occurs.
We have tested the apps with these nexus devices:
- Nexus 7 2012
- Nexus 4
- Nexus 7 2013
- Galaxy Nexus
This sounds strange, especially in such case:
"The self-signed X.509 certificate may be replaced at a later time by a certificate signed by a real Certificate Authority."
as indicated by the KeyPairGenerator Class documentation.
We think the correct behaviour should be to not loose the keypair when the user changes the screen lock method.