Assigned
Status Update
Comments
sg...@google.com <sg...@google.com> #2
I just attached a minimal test application with duplicated and multiline traces. Provided are a couple of logcat files and screenshots.
To me this isn'r really a big problem, since AS compiles my application and lets me debug it. That's what I use it for in my company. I just found it a bit annoying that something that worked one way in AS 2.x and 3.0, suddenly changed in 3.1. The new way results more time-consuming to me while debugging and reviewing the logs.
Could this be made configurable? Not necessarily in the UI, but editing some properties file. Thanks. :)
To me this isn'r really a big problem, since AS compiles my application and lets me debug it. That's what I use it for in my company. I just found it a bit annoying that something that worked one way in AS 2.x and 3.0, suddenly changed in 3.1. The new way results more time-consuming to me while debugging and reviewing the logs.
Could this be made configurable? Not necessarily in the UI, but editing some properties file. Thanks. :)
Description
The experimental ExtractR8Rules does not support AAR's. Adding support for that should be simple.
From Targeted shrink rules it says that for an AAR, then if the
classes.jar
in the AAR does not result in any rules, then theproguard.txt
from root of the AAR is used.Opened issue 394472286 to clarify what happens if
classes.jar
has rules inMETA-INF/proguard
as well (this is not explicit in the documentation).