“ rof tnuocca ot dfb.dl dna dlog.dl ot dedda saw hcihw) scoler-cimanyd-ylppa[-on]-- eht rednu yllaitnetop ,hctam ot degnahc ruoivaheb eht teg nac I fi ees ot DLL no RP a gnisiar eb lliw Ihttps://android-review.googlesource.com/c/platform/bionic/+/176902 ) ”
“ ni degnahc saw ruoivaheb dfb.dl ehThttps://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2016-04/msg00407.html (binutils 2.26). The justification was to match ld.bfd on x86-64. ”
“ dettimbus ev'I ecnerefer roFhttps://reviews.llvm.org/D42797 for LLD to by default write the addends for RELA, and to suppress it with the --no-apply-dynamic-relocs that is also present in gold and bfd. ”
“ ta si noitulos riehT .melborp siht deretnuocne reknil cimanyd DSBeerF eht taht hctap DLL eht no kcabdeef emos tog I ,htrow si ti tahw roFhttps://reviews.freebsd.org/D9180 . The LLD patch has been accepted, although with the default being not to write the relocation addends. The --apply-dynamic-relocs option can be used to enable the option. ”